Skip to comments.
Dick Morris: Bias-mongers on rocks as viewers taste straight news
The Hill ^
| August 13, 2003
| Dick Morris
Posted on 08/13/2003 9:18:13 AM PDT by Timesink
|The Political Life
Bias-mongers on rocks as viewers taste straight newsI am sure we were all surprised to learn in the Aug. 11 issue of The New York Times that people are " burned out on serious news." How else could the bastion of establishment journalism account for the falloff in network news viewership and, unnoted in the article, the newspaper's own decreasing circulation?
Yet the evidence is all there. People don't care anymore. That must be why The Times' circulation has fallen 5 percent and 1.1 million fewer households are watching network television news compared to last year at this time!
Jim Murphy, executive producer of the "CBS Evening News with Dan Rather," attempting to spin why his show has lost 600,000 viewers, notes patronizingly that we poor dears have been through " two years of very heavy-duty, stressful news, from Sept. 11 through the war with Iraq." In his opinion the loss of one-tenth of his show's audience is part of "a little bit of a break-taking going on across the spectrum."
Shaking their heads in sympathy, cable news networks CNN (down 22 percent) and MSNBC (down 25 percent) bemoan the lack of compelling news to cover. Jack Wakshlag, head of research for the Turner Broadcasting System, which manages CNN for AOL Time Warner, said that the falloff was because none of this year's news had sufficiently " broad appeal" or " emotional tug."
Don't these folks realize that it is their coverage, their bias, and their slanted news that is leading viewers to turn them off! Fox News, during the same period that caused such clucking by the establishment, had no difficulty adding 200,000 viewers during the news period and many more during prime time.
The Iraq War marked the beginning of the end of network news coverage. Viewers saw the juxtaposition of the embedded correspondents reporting the war as it was actually unfolding and the jaundiced, biased, negative coverage of these same events in the network newsrooms.
While U.S. and British troops advanced without serious opposition and with a minimum of casualties, the media worried loudly about disaster scenarios that never came to pass. The Turks weren't letting our troops through. There would be no two front war! Our supply lines were over-extended! Guerrilla attacks would leave our troops without food or ammo! Saddam would blow up the oil wells and trigger an eco-disaster from which it would take decades to recover! We were being sucked into house-by-house, street-by-street fighting in the capital! We didn't have enough troops! And, when the war was won, the networks and the newspapers fixated on the priceless artifacts that had been looted from the Baghdad Museum!
None of it happened. Now with the embedded correspondents withdrawn, these same networks and news sources tell us we face a quagmire in which we will lose dozens of soldiers each month for years and assure us that President Bush lied when he said there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. When the weapons are found and the killing slows or stops, the networks will have moved on to other stories.
The reason people aren't watching network news and are canceling their subscriptions to establishment press organs is that they are fed up with the manipulation and deliberate juggling of the news they see and read each day. An increasingly educated electorate can spot bias with greater acumen and astuteness than ever before.
Nor is the bias just tilting toward the left. The failure of news organs to cover the concerns of the left wing of the Democratic Party has triggered a disenchantment among those voters every bit as deep as on the right. The ability of leftists like Bill Maher and Michael Moore to attract an audience attests to the alienation of the left from the establishment.
Americans are refusing to be spoon fed anyone's idea of the news. They no longer care to dine on the meal served by Rather or Peter Jennings (Tom Brokaw seems to fare better) or by CNN or MSNBC. They want to make their own choices in the marketplace. The Internet lets them do just that and they are voting with their remote controls to turn off the party line they get on the networks.
Dick Morris is the author of Off With Their Heads: Traitors, Crooks, and Obstructionists in American Politics, Media, and Business.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abc; abcnews; biasedmedia; cablenewsnetwork; cbs; cbsnews; chickennoodlenews; cnn; dickmorris; fnc; fox; foxnews; foxnewschannel; mediabias; medialies; msdnc; msnbc; nbc; nbcnews; news; newsmedia; newyorktimes; nyt; nytschadenfreude; pmsnbc; schadenfreude; thenewyorktimes; tvnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
posted on 08/13/2003 9:18:14 AM PDT
To: GOPJ; Pharmboy; reformed_democrat; RatherBiased.com; nopardons; Tamsey; Miss Marple; SwatTeam; ...
This is the nascent Mainstream Media Shenanigans ping list. Please freepmail me to be added or dropped.
Please note this will likely become a high-volume list.
Also feel free to ping me if you come across a thread you would think worthy of the ping list. I can't catch them all!
posted on 08/13/2003 9:19:05 AM PDT
good read and true. I made the switch to FNC during the 2000 Election saga, and I have never turned back.
posted on 08/13/2003 9:21:53 AM PDT
To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...
This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
posted on 08/13/2003 9:22:01 AM PDT
It's tough to manufacture consent when nobody's paying attention to you. Poor babies.
posted on 08/13/2003 9:25:58 AM PDT
posted on 08/13/2003 9:26:09 AM PDT
It is wrong to accuse the New York Times
of dishonesty in concluding that its market is shrinking because people are "less interested in serious news." Objectively, of course, that conclusion is a lie. But the bigotry at the Times
is so pervasive that they simply cannot see what is happening.
One might as well ask a man who's been blind from birth to describe a Monet painting, as ask the Times to describe why readers are turning against them.
Latest column, "Nuts and Bolts in California" posted on FR, also published in San Francisco.
posted on 08/13/2003 9:33:13 AM PDT
by Congressman Billybob
("Don't just stand there. Run for Congress." www.ArmorforCongress.com)
To: Timesink; Joy Angela; conservogirl; Ragtime Cowgirl; Alamo-Girl; Mia T; onyx; amom; Carl/NewsMax
WALTER CRONKITE's Anti-U.S. Bias produced over 1.5 Million S.E. Asian Deaths after he fooled us on TV into leaving them behind at the hands of invading Communist Bullies during the Vietnam War.
WALTER CRONKITE is now 2004 Presidential Candidate HILLARY RODHAM's No. 1 TV Media Defensive Linebacker who publically called for all our Southern States to secede from our Union, in violation of our U.S. Constitution.
HILLARY's Media Partners BROKAW, JENNINGS and RATHER will not go away until after they can have their own effect on the 2004 Presidential Election on HILLARY's behalf.
Why else would lifelong Canadian Citizen PETER JENNINGS suddenly become an American Citizen after all these years..?
The Enemy is now Within...
and always has been.
posted on 08/13/2003 9:45:00 AM PDT
by ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com ..)
To: Congressman Billybob
But the bigotry at the Times is so pervasive that they simply cannot see what is happening.
The Times and the other major media outlets, who cannot see the bias on the wall, suffer the same denial that an alcoholic suffers. Like an alcoholic, the Times and its media brethern, will not acknowledge their problem until after they have hit "rock bottom," and even then they may refuse to recognize that they are the cause of their own demise. Without a 12 step recovery program, they will end up in the gutter, penniless, and smelling of puke.
A very good article. The plain simple truth for me is that I don't trust any media that isn't objective about its subject-matter. Part of being objective is adhering to the Joe Friday "just the facts, ma'am" approach to reporting (a/k/a the five Ws -- who, what, when, where, and why). Another part of being objective is stating all
of the relevant facts, not just the facts that support the particular bias of the reporter or the media outlet in question.
None of the major media -- not even Fox News -- meets this criteria for me, but at least Fox makes more of an effort and is much more honest about the distinction between hard news and editorializing in the phony guise of hard news, or between facts and opinions or speculation. Outlets such as the NYT, the Washington Post, network news, and CNN are so non-objective that they border or even cross the line of intellectual dishonesty.
posted on 08/13/2003 9:49:02 AM PDT
"Don't these folks realize that it is their coverage, their bias, and their slanted news that is leading viewers to turn them off!"
Exactly right. I, a lifelong news junkie, without cable no less, have given up my nightly news fix after:
1. watching the mediacrats' nightly drumbeat of negative economic news (despite indicators otherwise) that became a self-fulfilling prophecy in consumer confidence.
2. hearing Pres. Bush consistently cast as the one who stole the 2000 election.
3. playing the blame game re 9/11 and the War on Terror.
4. accusing Pres. Bush of politicizing 9/11 when the opposite is callously and obviously true.
5. showing only the negative aspects of our administration of Iraq in the past 100 days
6. taking the traitorous position on every issue I can think of
7. gleefully doing everything possible to put Pres. Bush into an opinion poll "freefall" from 61% to 59% then gloating about their success.
I do tune in infrequently to remember the enemy, and to see if it's the night that Blather finally falls off the ledge.
Thanks to FR I see the news of the world, conservative and liberal, every night, along with commentary from all over the spectrum. Here, we are respected enough (well, mostly) to be trusted to think for ourselves. Thank you FR! Contribution on the way.
posted on 08/13/2003 9:50:57 AM PDT
I've been watching Fox News since its inception. I have always agreed with their "fair and balanced" representation....and I will continue to watch.
posted on 08/13/2003 9:52:28 AM PDT
The liberals who run the major network news divisions and the NY Times are astonishingly stupid. The answer is right in front of them, but they remain stuck forever in 1970, giving us the Liberal Truth as they see it. Unfortunately, the people who still buy that are dieing off or realizing that the truth is not always or even mostly slanted left.
They are so arrogant they don't even consider their own obvious bias is the reason. Instead, they rely on half-baked studies to "prove" they are not biased and everyone else is wrong. Morons.
Amen brother. I only watch news once in a while and thats only to see what they are lying about today.
The Established media is to bias as green flies are to dog crap.
Every time I get ready to write off Dick Morris as a overrated political hack, he comes out with something like this...
posted on 08/13/2003 9:56:10 AM PDT
by Interesting Times
(Leftists view the truth as an easily avoidable nuisance)
I also credit FreeRepublic and the internet with the downfall of mainstream media. I think the material point here is that when one has the opportunity to access information one is able to draw one's concluions without the mainstream filters. Information that is deliberately omitted from a news story to shape any agenda only works when there is suppression of sources and opposing voices.
The mainstream media must hate ALGore's internet invention.
I seem to recall a saying that is proving itself ever so true:
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, you can fool all of the people some of the time but you can't fool all of the people all of the time".
Let's face it, stupid will always be with us although some people are will to think for themselves - Thank God.
posted on 08/13/2003 10:01:49 AM PDT
Terrific column, thanks! Morris summarizes the situation well... a nice read :-)
posted on 08/13/2003 10:04:17 AM PDT
(I was a vegetarian until I started leaning toward the sunlight...... Rita Rudner)
"The reason people aren't watching network news and are canceling their subscriptions to establishment press organs is that they are fed up with the manipulation and deliberate juggling of the news they see and read each day. An increasingly educated electorate can spot bias with greater acumen and astuteness than ever before."
GOOD GRIEF!!! And this is DICK MORRIS saying this??!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson