Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Humans and Their Fur Parted Ways
The New York Times (Science Times) ^ | August 19, 2003 | NICHOLAS WADE

Posted on 08/19/2003 5:41:06 AM PDT by Pharmboy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last
To: Sam Cree
Sorry! Should have sourced that figure.

For anyone wanting to read the web article from the beginning, click here.

L and M are a neanderthal and a Cro-magnon, respectively.

101 posted on 08/19/2003 7:05:32 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
"Well, "M" looks a little like James Carville."

Yeah, has about as much hair!

102 posted on 08/19/2003 7:36:35 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Thanks.

So, if I am reading this right, Cro Magnon man was a "modern" man.
103 posted on 08/19/2003 7:42:07 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
btw, now that you posted the picture, I see what they meant, talking about "long" faces on that other thread, and the relative shortness of ours.
104 posted on 08/19/2003 7:44:49 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Another silly thread where people who should know better argue with creationists. They aren't going to change their limited view of the world why bother educating them?
105 posted on 08/19/2003 7:51:18 PM PDT by Sentis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Cro-magnon is basically modern and is grouped within H. sapiens. The fossils show a more robust appearance than the typical modern skull, but they're within easy striking distance.
106 posted on 08/19/2003 7:57:24 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Yup. Some real pooch muzzles on that figure there.
107 posted on 08/19/2003 7:58:23 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Yeah, I see that the cheekbones are very prominent on that Cro Magnon skull.
108 posted on 08/19/2003 8:05:10 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Background on that Cro-magnon find. (Doesn't get any prettier close up.)
109 posted on 08/19/2003 8:08:48 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Little Ray; Maria S
It is up to me to do the disclaimer on Mr. Retro's post #95.

M and N in that set are humans. L, K, and J are Neandertals which DNA tests have shown are not the ancestors of modern humans. That takes us back to I, Homo Egaster, which went extinct long before M and N ever show up in the fossil record (about 40 something thousand years ago). Those dots do not connect.

A-I homininds look as much like the great ape they just discovered in the Congo as they do a human. It does not follow that N and M descended from them.
110 posted on 08/19/2003 8:17:42 PM PDT by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Ahban
Those dots do not connect.

You mean like, "Where are the transitionals?" Nothing will ever connect the dots for you.

When Darwin wrote, you know how much of that figure had been observed? "A" and "N." So long after he's dead we find B through M ordered correctly in the sediments. I keep asking, was he right or was he the luckiest charlatan of all time?

Out for the night.

111 posted on 08/19/2003 8:24:35 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: SLB
Well, my take on this article is this. The pictures at the top are captioned to show conventional wisdom, not stated as fact, also the webbing comment is refering to a theory that has benn around for a few decades, that our ancestors were in a tight spot, and lived in the water for a while (many generations)--the evidence supporting this theory is webbing, lack of body hair and fatty "blubber" layer under the skin. They obviously left the semi-aquatic lifestyle long ago. And nowhere here does it try to say you were evolved from a frog.
112 posted on 08/19/2003 8:44:25 PM PDT by Unassuaged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Of course, they would never consider that we humans were originally without "fur" and that we were designed that way by a Creator Who in the end is going to have the Last Laugh!

So far, there's only one piece of evidence supporting this - the Bible (and Koran). But there are literally thousands of pieces of evidence - common genes and mutations and other genetic material - supporting the idea that we share a common ancestor with the (other) great apes.

Just the Bible and Koran. No other religion has anything much like Genesis.

113 posted on 08/19/2003 8:56:36 PM PDT by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Virginia-American
So far, there's only one piece of evidence supporting this - the Bible (and Koran)

The evidence we have is exactly the same evidence that evolutionists have. Fossils are fossils are fossils. The difference is, we have a different worldview. We accept the fact of the existence of God, and His creative acts. The history of those acts is recorded in the Bible, that is true. But that does not automatically negate our interpretation of the facts.

I teach my students that truth claims are only true ir they comport with reality. Your truth claim of lot's of evidence for evolution just won't stand up to what is actually being discovered. The incredible complexity of even the smallest cell, chock full of information, defies an evolutionary explanation. The smallest known cell contains 482 genes and 540,00 base pairs in its DNA, and it doesn't have enough genetic information to live on its on - it is a parasite. So where did all the information for the first stand alone living cell come from? Evolutionist cannot answer that question...and yet that is the most basic question that can be asked.

Respectfully
LiteKeeper

114 posted on 08/19/2003 9:11:43 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Fossils are fossils are fossils.

I never mentioned fossils - just the shared dna.

Your truth claim of lot's of evidence for evolution just won't stand up to what is actually being discovered

Check this out: Plagiarized Errors and Molecular Genetics

Especially the chart in section 4.7 Is there a non-evolutionary explanation for this?

[abiogenesis] Evolutionist cannot answer that question...

That's a far cry from "never will anwser that question". The genetic code was only discovered 50 years ago. do you think it's realistic to expect its origins to already have been figured out? It's being researched RNA World Lots of intriguing hypotheses and theorizing, not a whole lot of solid results yet. I'm very curious what we will find under the ice on some of the moons of Jupiter and Saturn.

115 posted on 08/19/2003 9:27:57 PM PDT by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Crap like this gives science and especially evoutionary theory a bad name. The louse theory is speculative enough, but to confound it with sexual dimorphism makes it read like a 3rd-rate science fiction fantasy. It's a shitty job, but I guess someone's got to make science interesting, relevant and captivating to the masses.
116 posted on 08/19/2003 10:52:26 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
I stand corrected; however my point was that we did not evolve from modern apes. Some people think we evolved from chimps and gorillas and this obviously not the case. We share a distant common ancestor and from that point our species have diverged.
To go with your skulls, it is interesting to note that an infant chimp looks much more human than an adult chimp.
117 posted on 08/20/2003 6:25:08 AM PDT by Little Ray (When in trouble, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: e_engineer
ROTF!!! I missed that thread! Thanks for the link. I needed a giggle :)
118 posted on 08/20/2003 6:28:57 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: paws_and_whiskers
LOL! I immediately thought of this guy!
119 posted on 08/20/2003 6:32:02 AM PDT by Snowy (My golden retriever can lick your honor student)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Ahban
Might as well mention, regarding your other claims, that A and I (or B and I for that matter) don't look the same to me, nor do I and J look unbreachably different. There is nothing magical in your arbitrary lumpings.

Furthermore, different creationists (or even the same creationist at different times) produce different arbitrary lumpings from the same data. The game, of course, is to say that everything HERE is "An ape! Just an ape!" but everything THERE is "A man! Just a man!" So where is the line drawn?

All over the map.

Creationist Classifications of Hominid Fossils
Specimen Cuozzo
(1998)
Gish
(1985)
Mehlert
(1996)
Bowden
(1981)
Menton
(1988)
Taylor
(1992)
Gish
(1979)
Baker
(1976)
Taylor
and Van
Bebber
(1995)
Taylor
(1996)
Lubenow
(1992)
ER 1813 ER 1813
(510 cc)
Ape Ape Ape Ape Ape Ape
Java Man Java
(940 cc)
Ape Ape Human Ape Ape Human
Peking Man Peking
(915-
1225 cc)
Ape Ape Human Ape Human Human
ER 1470 ER 1470
(750 cc)
Ape Ape Ape Human Human Human
ER 3733 ER 3733
(850 cc)
Ape Human Human Human Human Human
WT 15000 WT 15000
(880 cc)
Ape Human Human Human Human Human

120 posted on 08/20/2003 7:11:04 AM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson