Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nettie; Devil_Anse; All
Responded Peterson, according to the sources: "Yes … uh … uh … but no. But I know who did and I'll tell you later when I see you."

Question: who are these sources? These tapes are sealed potential evidence. It is unclear that they will be used, isn't it? MG, we know, will object to them. It's almost certain that the "sources" are not the defense. All persons--Amber, MPD, prosecution are under gag order. As reported by Fox, this was a direct quote. Is this not a serious violation of the gag order?

41 posted on 08/25/2003 10:04:53 AM PDT by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Sandylapper
I am surprised at Fox News for this!! It could eliminate the use of that particular taped conversation. However, Amber is still a witness and they cannot eliminate her. Notice how DESPERATE the Defense is? Quote from Geragos" If this information gets out to the public it will cause IRREVERSIBLE harm to SP getting a fair trial"!! That tells me that the evidence is indeed DAMNING. Probably damning beyond what the scream team defense can think up.!!
42 posted on 08/25/2003 1:30:41 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Sandylapper
this isn't new "news"....I read about what he said to AMber some time ago...including the part about how he knew who did "it"....

I go to a lot of forums, but I really believe that I read it here on FR....

76 posted on 08/25/2003 11:07:21 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson