Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LBJ was behind JFK's assassination, upcoming book contends
Knight Ridder Newspapers ^ | Aug. 20, 2003 | HYE JEONG

Posted on 08/20/2003 6:18:44 PM PDT by new cruelty

GULFPORT, Miss. - (KRT) - The father of the White House press secretary claims in his upcoming book, "Blood, Money & Power: How L.B.J. Killed J.F.K.," that former President Lyndon B. Johnson was behind the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Barr McClellan, father of White House press secretary Scott McClellan and Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Mark McClellan, is preparing for a Sept. 30 release of a 480-page book by Hannover House that offers photographs, copies of letters, insider interviews and details of fingerprints as proof that Edward A. Clark, the powerful head of Johnson's private and business legal team and a former ambassador to Australia, led the plan and cover-up for the 1963 assassination in Dallas.

Kennedy was shot and killed while throngs watched his motorcade travel through Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963. Vice President Johnson was sworn in as president shortly after on Air Force One.

"(Johnson) had the motive, opportunity and means," said McClellan, 63, who was a partner in an Austin law firm that served Johnson. The book, McClellan said in an exclusive interview at his Orange Grove home, is about "(Johnson's) role in the assassination. He was behind the assassination, how he was and how it all developed."

McClellan and his wife have lived in Gulfport since 1998, where his wife's family lives. McClellan consults for some businesses on the Coast and writes books.

McClellan said he includes information in the book that alludes to Johnson's role in the assassination. An example is a story that was told to him by the late Martin Harris, former managing partner at the law firm, as told to Harris by Clark.

McClellan writes in his book that in a 1961 meeting on Johnson's ranch outside Johnson City, Texas, Johnson gave Clark a document that may have helped the assassin:

"Johnson suddenly let Clark go. `That envelope in the car,' he said quietly, almost an afterthought, `is yours.' Stepping toward the car, he muttered, `Put it to good use.' He turned, putting his arms across Clark's shoulders, pulling him along, (and) the two walked toward the convertible.

"As they drove back to the ranch, Clark opened the envelope. It contained the policy manual for protection of the president."

Barry Bishop, senior shareholder of Clark's former law firm, defended the attorney.

McClellan's theory is "absurd," Bishop said over the phone. "Mr. Clark was a big supporter of Mr. Kennedy. The day that President Kennedy was assassinated, there was going to a be a dinner that evening in Texas. Mr. Clark was a co-sponsor of that dinner."

McClellan's book is just one of numerous conspiracy theory books that criticize the conclusion of the FBI's investigation of the assassination, that found that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman.

According to the Warren Commission's 1964 report, "Examination of the facts of the assassination itself revealed no indication that Oswald was aided in the planning or execution of his scheme."

But that hasn't stopped people from writing books that challenge the Warren Commission's findings. Other ideas about who was behind the assassination include U.S. intelligence agents, the Mafia, Nikita Khrushchev, the military-industrial complex and Cuban exiles.

So why should people believe McClellan? What makes his book different?

"The big beauty is, (readers) don't have to believe a word I say," McClellan said. "They can believe the fingerprint examiner. They can believe the exchange of memos and letters."

"The book is the evidence," said Cecile McClellan, McClellan's wife, who has edited much of the book. "When you read that book and look at those exhibits, and say, `Do I believe this?' There it is … It's like (McClellan is) a lawyer presenting this book to the jury. You make your own decision. He's putting it all out there."

The theory that Johnson was involved is "exceedingly unlikely," said John C. McAdams, who is an outspoken supporter of the Warren Commission's findings and teaches a course on the JFK assassination at Marquette University in Milwaukee. "What did he (McClellan) find in the documents, and what does it, in fact, indicate? If he's looking at all the documents everyone else is looking at, I would want to know which documents he's interpreting as L.B.J."

Eric Parkinson, president of Truman Press Inc., the parent company of Hannover House, said the book comes out at a good time.

"Now, 40 years later, it's appropriate that this additional information be brought to light. It (the book) will provide closure for a lot of people."

McClellan began working with Clark in 1966 and said he had no role in the conspiracy. But he did hear rumors about it.

"When I first started work there and was told that Clark was behind the assassination, I didn't believe it. It was, `This guy you really liked, John Kennedy - he was killed by the guy you're working for now.' I think I went into a bad case of denial."

McClellan said he learned of Clark's role several times, from Clark and others in the law firm, including while he was acting as Clark's lawyer. The case involved the 1969 application for Clark to drill an oil well and name it after himself.

At the time, McClellan said he asked Clark about the rumors he had been hearing. He said Clark talked in code, but he said, "He wanted the payoff for it. When you mention Dallas, you were talking about the assassination. We had a discussion about it. That's in the book, pretty much verbatim."

But why didn't McClellan go public with the information back then?

"When you get inside the attorney-client privilege, you find out a whole lot," McClellan said. "At the time I thought everything I learned was privileged. I've since found out that there's no privilege for lawyers who plan crimes," he said, referring to Clark.

McClellan said he left the law firm in 1982 because Clark wanted him to represent a company that would conflict with interests of McClellan's other clients. Then, he said, Clark sued him over a personal loan. McClellan counter-sued. Then the bank holding the loan sued.

"When I found out what they were going to do to me, I got mad. The gloves came off. I said, `Forget it. They're not going to get away with this anymore.'"

But it took years before McClellan was able to publish the book that he said supports his assassination theory.

Finally in 1994, the 14-year legal battle with the lawsuits ended with dismissals. By that time, Clark had been dead for two years.

McClellan said he was trying to get a book out in 1984, while Clark was alive. "He knew I was going public - from the affidavits in one of those three lawsuits," McClellan said. And he said a book agent he approached in 1984 told him to "do an investigation."

So he began.

"I wanted to be comfortable with what I knew," McClellan said. He said it took a long time to verify fingerprints with several experts and to find a publisher.

"A lot of it wouldn't have been available except that old Clark's records" were bequeathed to Southwestern University, McClellan said, making them available for research. Previously "they were stored in his private records. I'm sure if he had thought about it before he died, he would have probably thrown away a few."

McClellan had been writing bits and pieces of the book since he left the law firm. He logged numerous hours of research and 10 researchers helped him, he said.

Supporters and detractors have talked to McClellan about possible repercussions from the book, McClellan said, but he's not losing any sleep.

McClellan said he hasn't had any overt threats. He said people imply retributions, like suggesting that "I'm not going to make it in Austin. `You're going to be out of here.'"

McClellan said at least some in his family accept his work on the book.

"They said, `OK, I guess that's what Dad's doing now,'" McClellan said.

But he said he has not had the chance to ask sons Scott and Mark for their reactions.

"I assume that they know about it," McClellan said. "They know what I'm doing. They're not going to comment on it. The oldest, Mark, was then maybe 15 when I left the law firm."

When asked if he was concerned for the safety of his twin sons, Dudley, an Austin lawyer in private practice, and Bradley, a Texas state associate attorney general, McClellan said: "The Democrats are pretty much out of power, really, in the state of Texas. So as far as Republicans go, they're in good shape. My ex-wife (Carole Keeton Strayhorn) - she's the comptroller of the state of Texas. There's really none of this influence or anything like that."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2ndgunman; 33rddegree; assassination; backandtotheleft; bookreview; dealeyplaza; freemasons; grassyknoll; illuminati; jfk; jfkassassination; kingkill; lbj; tinfoil; vastleftieconspiracy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 801-839 next last

1 posted on 08/20/2003 6:18:44 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
It was Johnson ... Ladybird Johnson.
2 posted on 08/20/2003 6:22:36 PM PDT by evolved_rage (Davis is a POS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Does this mean we get to see more JFK specials on C-Span and PBS?
3 posted on 08/20/2003 6:26:08 PM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
I've always thought Johnson set him up.
4 posted on 08/20/2003 6:26:56 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye
Complete with video and commentary of things having come full circle when Bubba was in the WH.
5 posted on 08/20/2003 6:28:28 PM PDT by Paul Atreides (Bringing you quality, non-unnecessarily-excerpted threads since 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
I have believed it was LBJ since the 1970s.

I saw a documentary which quoted LBJ's mistress (at the time) who stated that he told her--two weeks before the assassination--"Those Kennedies will never s**t on me again," or words to that effect.

--Boris

6 posted on 08/20/2003 6:29:06 PM PDT by boris (Education is always painful; pain is always educational.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
I've been out. Did Dan Rather breathlessly devote his program to charts and graphs proving Gerald Posner (Case Closed) is right? With the 40th anniv. coming, we can expect more books, and Dan's breathless special.
7 posted on 08/20/2003 6:30:15 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evolved_rage
"(Johnson) had the motive, opportunity and means,"

That much has been obvious to anyone who has thought much about the matter. It might be interesting to see how he tries to back it up.

I have to admit that the motive, opportunity, and means of Johnson always made me wonder if he was involved. He certainly had the ethics and morals for it.

8 posted on 08/20/2003 6:30:44 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Well .. of COURSE Johnson was behind this whole thing ... BUT that was never exposed in Oliver Stone's movie JFK so I don't believe it ...

</sarcasm>

9 posted on 08/20/2003 6:33:02 PM PDT by _Jim (First INDICT the ham sandwhich ... the next step is to CONVICT it ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
It wouldn't surprise me if lbj was involved. I remember theories floating at the time that sounded plausible to me.
10 posted on 08/20/2003 6:34:47 PM PDT by mombonn (íViva Bush/Cheney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
Boris, I'm old enough to remember the Kennedy assassination. I was convinced right from the beginnning that LBJ was involved in it.

He had been chosen by JFK as his Vice-President because of his power in the Senate (where he had held sway as Majority Leader). I think JFK oiled him up and convinced him he'd be even more powerful as VP. Once JFK was in the WH, however, LBJ realized that he'd been used. LBJ was a vengeful man who had come up in the rough and tumble Texas politics of the late 40's and 50's.

I don't know if we'll ever know the truth in our lifetime, but future generations will know the truth.

11 posted on 08/20/2003 6:35:50 PM PDT by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Let us try to list all of those that might have been involved in the hit ... FBI, CIA, Castro, Russians, Corsican mob, Mossad, Chicago mob, New Orleans mob, Teamsters, LBJ, Nixon, Bush (PHEW!)

Let's do this the easy way. Let's figure out who was NOT involved ... every Irish Catholic woman in America.

Get the point!

12 posted on 08/20/2003 6:37:49 PM PDT by LandofLincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
I believe it.

Johnson was a ruthless and power mad politician with a psycho ego. He routinely crushed and ruined his opponents in business, politics and law.

He should be dug up and hung.
13 posted on 08/20/2003 6:38:00 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Democrats have stunted brain development!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette
My brother worked in D.C. at the time of the assassination. He tells me that the Inside the Beltway gossip at the time was that LBJ was behind the assassination.
14 posted on 08/20/2003 6:39:02 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
This is preposterous. LBJ was ruthless enough to do whatever he thought best, but he wasn't stupid enough to point at himself by doing it in Texas. He would have had it done if he was gonna do it on the East or West Coast.

This twits sons are either going to have to explicitly disavow their father or resign from office, cause there is gonna be a shitstorm over this.

So9

15 posted on 08/20/2003 6:39:32 PM PDT by Servant of the Nine (A Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Interesting, I will read the book just like I have read all of the others and see what he has to say. I have heard rumors about LBJ over the years, and know that he was a pretty dirty politican, and that is about all I know about him.
16 posted on 08/20/2003 6:40:13 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
He should be dug up and hung.

or hung in EFFIGY...

or DALLAS!

17 posted on 08/20/2003 6:41:01 PM PDT by JOE6PAK (Ambivalent? Well, yes and no.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
This is why no DemocRAT would ever have Hillary as VP on his ticket.
18 posted on 08/20/2003 6:41:58 PM PDT by doug from upland (Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Nine
You're assuming the administration would object to this book. How do you know it isn't meant as a warning of what other RAT misdeeds might be revealed if the RATs are excessively uncooperative?
19 posted on 08/20/2003 6:42:00 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
I'm old enough to remember JFK's assassination in Dallas ... it was a watershed event for "baby boomers" not unlike Pearl Harbor for our parents. LBJ was not involved in any way shape or form in Kennedy's assassination ... this is pure bunk!
20 posted on 08/20/2003 6:42:29 PM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Speaking of Oliver Stone, did you notice in 'Any Given Sunday' the several references to the illuminati?


21 posted on 08/20/2003 6:42:55 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Yep it was Kennedy's Johnson that did him in
22 posted on 08/20/2003 6:44:46 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
There's a new book about the assassination of Garfield. Garfield's VP, Chester Arthur, who succeeded him, was a member of the other wing of the Republican Party at the time. Garfield's assassin also belonged to that wing. The author said in a C-SPAN interview there is no evidence proving that any politicians of that wing were involved in an assassination plot, but the author obviously has suspicions along those lines.
23 posted on 08/20/2003 6:44:52 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
I don't think LBJ "did it", but I think he was complicit and approving of those that did do it. I remember very clearly LBJ smiling on TV the same day of the assaination. He was a ruthless man and was also complicit with those who drug on the Vietnam war.
24 posted on 08/20/2003 6:45:04 PM PDT by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Years ago I heard Johnson backed the Canadian Prime Minister against the wall for his opposition to US involvement in Vietnam. If that story was true, it shows LBJ could get violent, and he did hate the Kennedy's, but I'm still not totally convinced of this. I think it was Castro or the Russians.
25 posted on 08/20/2003 6:45:34 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
"He should be dug up and hung"

LOL I love it!
26 posted on 08/20/2003 6:46:24 PM PDT by cyberwatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
Those who have read any of Robert Caro's biography of LBJ know how utterly ruthless and unprincipled the man was in his ambitions.
27 posted on 08/20/2003 6:46:48 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
I have a bizarre and outlandish hypothesis: Oswald pulled the trigger and acted alone.
28 posted on 08/20/2003 6:47:08 PM PDT by Taft in '52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette
MacBird bump.

;^)
29 posted on 08/20/2003 6:47:25 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
I have believed this to be the case since Walter announced Kennedy had died!
30 posted on 08/20/2003 6:47:36 PM PDT by lawdude (Liberalism: A failure every time it is tried!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
LBJ was not involved in any way shape or form in Kennedy's assassination ... this is pure bunk!

But you have to remember where we are...Free Republic, where conspiracy theorists have found tons of company. The 'Flight 800' threads really do get rather amusing if one's in the mood for an evening of fantasy.

31 posted on 08/20/2003 6:47:42 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (40 miles inland, California becomes Flyover Country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Almost every JFK conspiracy theory is built upon one single critical foundation: Lee Harvey Oswald didn't shoot President Kennedy.

Some people just won't believe that a US Marine qualified as a Marksman could possibly make two hits in several seconds on a human target from less than 100 paces. The Mannlicher-Carcano is actually a decent shooting rifle, and Oswald was basically a competent rifleman.

I've never seen convincing evidence that leads me to believe that Oswald was incapable of making those shots. It's the only thing about the Kennedy Assassination that I'm sure about.

32 posted on 08/20/2003 6:48:26 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
Johnson said shortly after he was sworn in, "years from now everyone will say I had Kennedy killed so I could be president." Or words very close to this. It's in one of the old documentry films.
33 posted on 08/20/2003 6:48:33 PM PDT by SSN558 (Be on the lookout for Black White-Supremacists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
You know the liberals will outraged to say LBJ did it.

They want it to be Hoover or Goldwater or somehow
a right wing thing.
34 posted on 08/20/2003 6:49:12 PM PDT by Princeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Taft in '52
Someone with your screen name may be interested to learn that Bob Taft didn't get the Republican nomination in 1940 because the isolationist chairman of the convention was assassinated by British intelligence in cooperation with the FDR administration, at least if we are to believe Gore Vidal's novel Golden Age.
35 posted on 08/20/2003 6:49:17 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette
On those tapes from the Johnson white house, LBJ pleads with Earl Warren to lead the commission into JFK's death. He practically begs him.
36 posted on 08/20/2003 6:50:39 PM PDT by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid
I didn't Oswald qualified as Marksman.

In fact I read before he was a terrible shot
and basicly got booted out of the Marines.

And his fellow soldiers laughed at what an incredibly
bad shot he was. He was said to be by far the worst
shot in his Company.
37 posted on 08/20/2003 6:51:33 PM PDT by Princeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
There was another book written years ago with this same premise.

Remember the photo of LBJ being sworn in on the plane with Jackie Kennedy next to him? Well, the author included another photo taken seconds after that one...shows LBJ turning to a man behind him and both were beaming with looks of triumph! Jackie still in shock beside him.

I wish I could remember the title.

38 posted on 08/20/2003 6:51:33 PM PDT by FReepaholic (My other tag line is hilarious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Reynolds Wrap won't do the trick, it has to be actual tinfoil. Aluminum only makes it worse.
39 posted on 08/20/2003 6:52:03 PM PDT by Salman (Mickey Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
I recall an interview with a Mafia boss many years ago when he mentioned that whenever there is a murder you first look to who gained from it.

That would indicate Johnson, and I think he was capable of anything. Still I don't really think he did it. I think it was Oswald with maybe an accomplice. I always wondered if they had Oswald set up as a patsy and were probably surprised that he in fact did make a hit, alhtough probably someone else also did so.

40 posted on 08/20/2003 6:53:09 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
"If that story was true, it shows LBJ could get violent, and he did hate the Kennedy's, but I'm still not totally convinced of this."

I'm not totally convinced, either.

But, as to whether LBJ was capable of doing it, I've absolutely no doubts. You damn right he was capable of doing it.

41 posted on 08/20/2003 6:53:34 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Nine
Why in the world would the author's sons have to do anything at all? They didn't write the book and aren't responsible for what some adult relative writes abour.
42 posted on 08/20/2003 6:53:57 PM PDT by skr (The liberals are only interested in seeking Weapons for Bush Destruction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
I remember a reporter asking Johnson before he passed on about the assassination, and he claimed that once the truth is known it will shock people, or words to that effect.
43 posted on 08/20/2003 6:54:31 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid
"I've never seen convincing evidence that leads me to believe that Oswald was incapable of making those shots. It's the only thing about the Kennedy "

I agree 100%. I also concluded that LBJ was the force behind the shooting. They are not mutually exclusive, you know.

And as to other comments that, as freepers, we should not allow conspiracy theories to sway our 'thinking', I submit that there was sooo much to support the theory at the time, people could easily have drawn that conclusion. BUT, few believed that a man (Johnson) could stoop to such misadventures.

Different time, different thinking/mindset!

44 posted on 08/20/2003 6:54:42 PM PDT by lawdude (Liberalism: A failure every time it is tried!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
After reading maybe half a dozen books on the assassination, my instincts, along with the existing evidence, have consistently told me that LBJ had foreknowledge of the event and was complicit in its execution.

BTW, I'm a fifth cousin to LBJ (FWIW).

45 posted on 08/20/2003 6:54:45 PM PDT by Prince Caspian (Don't ask if it's risky... Ask if the reward is worth the risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman
I just thought it was fun spotting the references he placed in the movie, e.g. the eye being a logo for the Dallas Knights and the numbers on the jerseys.


hmph.


I'll go get my hat now. : )
46 posted on 08/20/2003 6:54:49 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
It is truly amazing what goes on here. Inside the beltway is a fascinating place to be when the fan gets hit.
47 posted on 08/20/2003 6:57:55 PM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette
"Boris, I'm old enough to remember the Kennedy assassination. I was convinced right from the beginnning that LBJ was involved in it."

At the time of the assassination I was an electronics technician stationed on the Navy base at Keflavik. I did maintenance and repairs on radio equipment but had no access to the messages. Within hours of the event there were rumors floating around on base that Johnson was involved. Apparently some people who had top secret clearances were leaking some of the messages but I have no way of knowing what was actually coming through. I have never believed the Warren report since the first time I actually looked into it.
48 posted on 08/20/2003 7:03:32 PM PDT by RipSawyer (Mercy on a pore boy lemme have a dollar bill!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Let's not forget that the British Foreign Service sent an agent to seduce "isolationist" Senator Arthur Vandenberg and then blackmailed said Senator into supporting entry into the war.
49 posted on 08/20/2003 7:03:51 PM PDT by Clemenza (East side, West side, all around the town. Tripping the light fantastic on the sidewalks of New York)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Taft in '52
You're leaving out the best part.

Oswald had contacted the Russians. They listened to what he had to say, decided he was a nut, and told him to beat it.

Oswald had contacted the Mafia. They listened to what he had to say, decided he was a nut, and told him to beat it.

After Oswald killed Kennedy, both the Mafia and the Russians panicked at the thought that they might be thought to be involved, so they did all kinds of things to obscure their connection with Oswald. This is what created all the plausible conspiracy theories.
50 posted on 08/20/2003 7:05:18 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 801-839 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson