Arnold backers: SHOULD GAYS BE ALLOWED TO ADOPT YOUNG BOYS? Arnold says yes -- do you agree?

AP via Lifesite.net ^ | Aug. 26, 03 | churchillbuff

[Redcloak]

Well... at the moment it looks like your only realistic options are "Gov. Schwarzenegger" or "Gov. Bustamante". Which one do you want?

[churchillbuff]

What you are doing is indistinguishable from what a Democrat operatitive would be doing on behalf of Cruz Bustamante.

I happen to think the issue of Gay Adoptions is important. I don't what the GOP to support Gay Adoptions. Why is it a crime to ask pro-Arnold freepers whether they agree with me or with Arnold on this fundamental issue that could have so much influence on our culture's future?

[68 grunt]

Jeeez, I had to go back and read my statements. I didn't say they didn't matter, I said they outta dry up and blow away. I sorta agree with your assessment that law should reflect a moral order, I'm only rejecting the moral order of those religious folks who would force their belief upon us.

[=Intervention=]

No room for diversity of thought here! GOP has spoken! Everyone fall in line!

[Weimdog]

Show me Arnold's exact words, not the quotes attributed to him by Lifesite.net and I'll let you know what I think.

Otherwise it's just hearsay speculation.

FACTS PLEASE!

[68 grunt]

I've noticed that, and a few other similies.

[LisaAnne]

Do you really think that you are going to change anyones vote by all the ranting and raving you do? Don't flatter yourself.

I will vote for whoever I think is best suited to dig us out of this financial mess we are in. I certainly are not going to take advice from anyone that has nothing to gain or lose in this election.

[=Intervention=]

Realism is determined by poll numbers from the LA Times, of course...or other polls of similar uhm veracity. Why are they correct now and not correct the rest of the year?

[DoughtyOne]

Sorry, I asked your gang to stop posting graphics and you guys refused and trashed me for it. Now, deal with it. Both sides can play that game. I tried to tell you that, now it's waaaaaaa time.

BTW, I don't trash McClintock on his policy. I agree with his platform. Please explain what motive I have for defending Schwarzenegger on this forum, other than to keep a viable fall back position alive?

Are you keeping an alternative position alive? No. You're seeking to eliminate one.

[AmericanInTokyo]

And you, sir or madam, kindly show a little respect towards other candidates.

If you are going to refer to one candidate by the first name only, refer to the others such as McClintock, as "Tom".

[68 grunt]

In post #45 he said 'McCormick".

[Grand Old Partisan]

"Everyone fall in line!"

I agree. Unite behind the front-runner, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and defeat Cruz Bustamante.

[=Intervention=]

Of course. Valid opinion or insight can only come from people whose lives are directly affected, and not from anyone else. That's completely illogical, but you said it and not I.

[DoughtyOne]

Please explain to the forum participants what happens on October 7th, if McClintock's pulling 10-15%, and Schwarzenegger's chances have been destroyed. I'd like to hear that logic. Bustamanted could never benefit from this right? LOL

[EllaMinnow]

It appears that sane parents must now put instructions in their wills about what kind of person(s) will ever be able to adopt their children should something happen to the parents.

With all due respect, sane parents have ALWAYS put it in their will who will get custody of their children in case of parental death.

[LisaAnne]

No, but it's sure easier for those who have nothing to lose to tell everyone else what to do. Liberals do it all the time.

[f.Christian]

Social conservatives outta dry up and blow away. Time to evolve!

Don't know if you are serious or joking ?

[68 grunt]

Don't stop with your graphics, Ron, you're doing superbly! I am most proud of your patient effort! You're also real effective at bringin' 'em outta the woodwork.