OUI, OUI: ARNOLD PUMPS UP ORGIES AND DOPE IN '77 SHOCK INTERVIEW

Drudge Report ^

[journey7873]

Posted on Drudge and Smoking Gun: The California recall campaign is officially getting dirty...

[Jim Robinson]

To all:

Do not post the text of this "article" or even a link to it. It is inappropriate material for FR and will be deleted.

Thanks,

Jim

[journey7873]

Why is it not appropriate?

[Senator Pardek]

Oui Vey!

[Jim Robinson]

Guess.

[dogbyte12]

I will not comment on the text, other than to say, I would love to see him explain now how his morals have changed since this interview. His moral values stunk then. I willl withold any comments on what he said because this is a family friendly site.

[gdani]

Ohhh.....maybe the swear words. Or the "frank sexual talk". Or.......

[prarie earth]

Is this the best the Clinton/Grey Davis team has got?

[Pokey78]

In California, this will GET him votes.

[DoughtyOne]

What is your fascination with full frontal male nudity?

[Windcatcher]

They think this will make voters mad? I couldn't stop laughing :^)

[prarie earth]

lol, Is Mary Carey available for comment?

[ambrose]

the interview will probably win him endorsements from all the major homosexual groups in California.

[Tempest]

*Sigh* What a pathetic attempt at slander. I haven't changed since 77' either. . .

GWB used to drink!!! *Shock*

[ambrose]

did you read the interview?

[ElkGroveDan]

Wow, I bet Bill Clinton is envious of Arnold. He's just as liberal but way more of a pervert.

[Ronin]

I am sure Arnold knew this was going to come out and already has a plan in place to deal with it.

Fact is, I vaguely remember reading this article when it was first published.

If I am not mistaken, there was even a "Little Annie Fanny" cartoon spoof of him back then too.

[journey7873]

What is your fascination with full frontal male nudity?

Wow, brilliant post.

[Voice in your head]

Most of the text cannot be published in the media, because it is so explicit. However, the only really damaging thing in the text is the part about using drugs. Other than that, he was candid about a good sex life. So what? Nobody had to buy the magazine - and he wasn't getting laid in the oval office while on the taxpayers' payroll.

[gdani]

I also question the labeling of it as a "dirty" campaign trick.

Making unproven accusations or starting whispering campaigns based purely on speculation -- stuff like that is dirty campaign stuff. Or when some people tried to make an issue about the race of Phil Gramm's wife.

But what's so "dirty" about calling to everyone's attention an interview that Ahh-nald gave to a magazine? I mean, what did he expect when he started running?

[ambrose]

how is it "slander"? it is an interview with Ahnold's own words. has he changed since the 70s? probably.

[AmericaUnited]

Wow, sex and pot... How repulsive to most Kalifornia moderate voters :)

[baltodog]

My morals are alot different now than they were in 1977.
However, I did not do some of the things he refers to.
If I did, I'm sure I would have used the exerience as a learning tool.

[swilhelm73]

Yoiu might as well name this one, "Davis's plumbers make their second major move."

[thoughtomator]

Impossible. I'm no Arnold fan, but I bet he can figure out what "is" is.

[Porterville]

So he was a kid in the 70's, what was Bustamonte doing??? Huffington???? Davis???? The answer is the same for each.

[discostu]

I think the response would be something along the lines of:
it was 26 years ago
I was single
you guys must be getting desperate to be looking things up in old skanky porno mags.

[GraniteStateConservative]

I think that his exploits may win him votes in urban communities where his life back then sounds like rap songs today. Maybe Bustamante won't get as many minority votes as he thinks.

[Windcatcher]

What's dirty about it is the insinuation that he's unfit to serve as Governor. That somehow this makes him incapable of the job. It's using people's prejudices and emotions to get them to make a knee-jerk reaction, which, as a poster here recently pointed out, is defined as demagoguery.

[f.Christian]

When arnold 1st became popular ... moreover about his body building fame --- I watched him in an interview say how much he appreciates the homosexuals who like his body !

Never liked him very much after that but I had been hoping he would turn out to be another Ronald Reagan ... hardly seems possible now --- I' m always the optimist - idealist until reality relentlessly takes over !

[socal_parrot]

Yeah, this is relevant. Wild sex in 77. Now if it can be proved that he wore a leisure suit and listend to disco? That would be another story.

[ejdrapes]

Drudge is just a hack journalist [sic] who has no class. It's obvious he's no Arnold fan and will dig up the dirt on him for the Dems. I wonder if he's on their payroll.

What is the point of bringing up something Arnold said 26 years ago? People change. They grow up, get married, have children. I'd be curious to know how many FReepers lifestyles and views have changed somewhat in the last two decades or so. I'd guess more have than haven't.

[gdani]

So he was a kid in the 70's......

He was 29 at the time of the article.

[Porterville]

Yeah, that means in the 70's he lived his 20's

[ambrose]

However, the only really damaging thing in the text is the part about using drugs.

I doubt anyone will care (or even notice), but he DENIED having ever done ANY drugs of ANY kind in a 1988 interview with Playboy.

[thoughtomator]

Pfft! That is not dirty.

You want to see dirty, just wait until the RINO crew feels threatened by McClintock, coming soon to a political theatre near you!

[drstevej]

This may get him the Democratic Presidential nomination!

[Windcatcher]

LOL! This will only make the 18-29-year-olds *envy* him.

[A CA Guy]

Don't know if he ever gave that interview or if this was fabricated, but sounds like he just rounded up the Libertarian vote.

[GraniteStateConservative]

California-- home of Cheech and Chong-- will be thoroughly outraged by his use of weed and hash.

[/sarcasm]

[Middle Aged White Male]

This whole thing seems... fishy. I mean, the interview was awfully descriptive for a guy who wasn't fluent in English for years into the 80's...

To be honest, I really don't care about this revelation. Does anyone expect someone living in his lifestyle to have an innocent history? Not that I am condoning it, but I could give two figs for this (or Bush's drug/alchohol past). I am voting for these candidates today, not 20 years ago. If this all happened in 1997 I would be much more concerned...

[Destro]

Lucky bastard!

[gdani]

Yeah, that means in the 70's he lived his 20's

Still an adult.

[discostu]

That's kind of a half truth there FC. His "appreciation" of the homosexuals who liked his body (by his own explanation) was because they were buying magazines he was appearing in, which was driving up sales, which in turn was driving up his appearance fee.

Most smart business men appreciate people that make them money.

[ambrose]

What is the point of bringing up something Arnold said 26 years ago? People change. They grow up, get married, have children.

"It is all about sex! Nothing to see here, move on."

Would love to see the responses here if the man giving that interview was one William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.

[Tempest]

It is slander to use such fodder in a manner as if it still has relevance today. If you think that such a disingeuous ploy to disparage the man isn't a slanderous I'm sure that your fine with the people whom tried to take advantage of GWB past indiscretions in which he to has admitted to and atoned for.

[Enterprise]

Enterprise: So, Mr. Schwarzenneger, what were you doing during the 70's?

Arnold: "Sex and pot."

Enterprise: I see. And you, Mr. Bustamante, what were you doing during the 70's?

Bustamante: "I was a member of a group which advocates violence and racism."

[zarf]

LOL!!! Arnies a shoe in!!

[Porterville]

BINGO, that is exactly correct, especially in hyper-sexed California... What a miss calculation.

[Earl B.]

What's dirty about it is the insinuation that he's unfit to serve as Governor. That somehow this makes him incapable of the job.

It's not dirty. He did these things. He publicly talked about them. It is perfectly legitimate to question his fitness for office based on this behavior. I clearly recall Bill Clinton getting a lot of heat for his drug use. Many candidates have been disqualified in the minds of the voters because of drugs and "immoral" behavior.

In California, I doubt that admitted marijuana usage (a long time ago) and a vigorous sex drive (in an unmarried man) will be seen as disqualifying. The language is what may put people off.

It may be ugly to watch, but it isn't dirty. Sometimes the truth can be painful.