Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OUI, OUI: ARNOLD PUMPS UP ORGIES AND DOPE IN '77 SHOCK INTERVIEW
Drudge Report ^

Posted on 08/27/2003 3:59:45 PM PDT by journey7873

Posted on Drudge and Smoking Gun: The California recall campaign is officially getting dirty...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 26kdollarwelfaretom; arnold; big10inch; bobmulholland; bustamentebooster; disgusting; drudgethinksfriswhat; gain4inchesovernight; lookingforbooty; moretocome; morons; schwarzenpervert; schwarzenrino; sick; theorgycandidate; vote4character; vote4mcclintock; warningshot; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 651-685 next last

1 posted on 08/27/2003 3:59:45 PM PDT by journey7873
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: journey7873; All
To all:

Do not post the text of this "article" or even a link to it. It is inappropriate material for FR and will be deleted.

Thanks,

Jim
2 posted on 08/27/2003 4:01:17 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Why is it not appropriate?
3 posted on 08/27/2003 4:04:05 PM PDT by journey7873
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Oui Vey!
4 posted on 08/27/2003 4:05:11 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
Guess.
5 posted on 08/27/2003 4:05:19 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
I will not comment on the text, other than to say, I would love to see him explain now how his morals have changed since this interview. His moral values stunk then. I willl withold any comments on what he said because this is a family friendly site.
6 posted on 08/27/2003 4:05:21 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
Ohhh.....maybe the swear words. Or the "frank sexual talk". Or.......
7 posted on 08/27/2003 4:06:26 PM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
Is this the best the Clinton/Grey Davis team has got?
8 posted on 08/27/2003 4:06:28 PM PDT by prarie earth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prarie earth
In California, this will GET him votes.
9 posted on 08/27/2003 4:07:51 PM PDT by Pokey78 ("I'm not going to start the Third World War for you"- Gen. Sir Michael Jackson to Gen. Wesley Clark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
What is your fascination with full frontal male nudity?
10 posted on 08/27/2003 4:07:59 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prarie earth
They think this will make voters mad? I couldn't stop laughing :^)
11 posted on 08/27/2003 4:08:20 PM PDT by Windcatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
lol, Is Mary Carey available for comment?
12 posted on 08/27/2003 4:08:32 PM PDT by prarie earth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
the interview will probably win him endorsements from all the major homosexual groups in California.
13 posted on 08/27/2003 4:08:35 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
*Sigh* What a pathetic attempt at slander. I haven't changed since 77' either. . .

GWB used to drink!!! *Shock*
14 posted on 08/27/2003 4:09:25 PM PDT by Tempest (Tom McNader, Cruz Bustamante couldn't have asked for a better friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
did you read the interview?
15 posted on 08/27/2003 4:09:28 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
Wow, I bet Bill Clinton is envious of Arnold. He's just as liberal but way more of a pervert.
16 posted on 08/27/2003 4:09:53 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (It's time for Arnold to stop splitting the Republican vote and step aside for the good of the party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prarie earth
I am sure Arnold knew this was going to come out and already has a plan in place to deal with it.

Fact is, I vaguely remember reading this article when it was first published.

If I am not mistaken, there was even a "Little Annie Fanny" cartoon spoof of him back then too.
17 posted on 08/27/2003 4:09:56 PM PDT by Ronin (Qui tacet consentit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
What is your fascination with full frontal male nudity?

Wow, brilliant post.

18 posted on 08/27/2003 4:10:19 PM PDT by journey7873
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
Most of the text cannot be published in the media, because it is so explicit. However, the only really damaging thing in the text is the part about using drugs. Other than that, he was candid about a good sex life. So what? Nobody had to buy the magazine - and he wasn't getting laid in the oval office while on the taxpayers' payroll.
19 posted on 08/27/2003 4:10:47 PM PDT by Voice in your head (Withdraw from Baghdad, then nuke it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
I also question the labeling of it as a "dirty" campaign trick.

Making unproven accusations or starting whispering campaigns based purely on speculation -- stuff like that is dirty campaign stuff. Or when some people tried to make an issue about the race of Phil Gramm's wife.

But what's so "dirty" about calling to everyone's attention an interview that Ahh-nald gave to a magazine? I mean, what did he expect when he started running?

20 posted on 08/27/2003 4:11:06 PM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
how is it "slander"? it is an interview with Ahnold's own words. has he changed since the 70s? probably.
21 posted on 08/27/2003 4:11:12 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
Wow, sex and pot... How repulsive to most Kalifornia moderate voters :)
22 posted on 08/27/2003 4:11:23 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
My morals are alot different now than they were in 1977.
However, I did not do some of the things he refers to.
If I did, I'm sure I would have used the exerience as a learning tool.
23 posted on 08/27/2003 4:11:41 PM PDT by baltodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
Yoiu might as well name this one, "Davis's plumbers make their second major move."
24 posted on 08/27/2003 4:12:03 PM PDT by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Impossible. I'm no Arnold fan, but I bet he can figure out what "is" is.
25 posted on 08/27/2003 4:12:08 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Welcome to the Iraq Roach Motel - Islamofascists check in, but they don't check out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
So he was a kid in the 70's, what was Bustamonte doing??? Huffington???? Davis???? The answer is the same for each.
26 posted on 08/27/2003 4:12:12 PM PDT by Porterville (Et tu liberal?? Et tu???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
I think the response would be something along the lines of:
it was 26 years ago
I was single
you guys must be getting desperate to be looking things up in old skanky porno mags.
27 posted on 08/27/2003 4:12:41 PM PDT by discostu (just a tuna sandwich from another catering service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
I think that his exploits may win him votes in urban communities where his life back then sounds like rap songs today. Maybe Bustamante won't get as many minority votes as he thinks.
28 posted on 08/27/2003 4:12:47 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (Willie Green for President...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gdani
What's dirty about it is the insinuation that he's unfit to serve as Governor. That somehow this makes him incapable of the job. It's using people's prejudices and emotions to get them to make a knee-jerk reaction, which, as a poster here recently pointed out, is defined as demagoguery.
29 posted on 08/27/2003 4:13:15 PM PDT by Windcatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: prarie earth
When arnold 1st became popular ... moreover about his body building fame --- I watched him in an interview say how much he appreciates the homosexuals who like his body !

Never liked him very much after that but I had been hoping he would turn out to be another Ronald Reagan ... hardly seems possible now --- I' m always the optimist - idealist until reality relentlessly takes over !
30 posted on 08/27/2003 4:13:17 PM PDT by f.Christian (evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
Yeah, this is relevant. Wild sex in 77. Now if it can be proved that he wore a leisure suit and listend to disco? That would be another story.
31 posted on 08/27/2003 4:13:33 PM PDT by socal_parrot (I'm here all week, tell your friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
Drudge is just a hack journalist [sic] who has no class. It's obvious he's no Arnold fan and will dig up the dirt on him for the Dems. I wonder if he's on their payroll.

What is the point of bringing up something Arnold said 26 years ago? People change. They grow up, get married, have children. I'd be curious to know how many FReepers lifestyles and views have changed somewhat in the last two decades or so. I'd guess more have than haven't.

32 posted on 08/27/2003 4:13:47 PM PDT by ejdrapes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
So he was a kid in the 70's......

He was 29 at the time of the article.

33 posted on 08/27/2003 4:13:49 PM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: gdani
Yeah, that means in the 70's he lived his 20's
34 posted on 08/27/2003 4:14:44 PM PDT by Porterville (Et tu liberal?? Et tu???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Voice in your head
However, the only really damaging thing in the text is the part about using drugs.

I doubt anyone will care (or even notice), but he DENIED having ever done ANY drugs of ANY kind in a 1988 interview with Playboy.

35 posted on 08/27/2003 4:14:49 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
Pfft! That is not dirty.

You want to see dirty, just wait until the RINO crew feels threatened by McClintock, coming soon to a political theatre near you!
36 posted on 08/27/2003 4:15:07 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Welcome to the Iraq Roach Motel - Islamofascists check in, but they don't check out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
This may get him the Democratic Presidential nomination!
37 posted on 08/27/2003 4:15:25 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gdani
LOL! This will only make the 18-29-year-olds *envy* him.
38 posted on 08/27/2003 4:15:28 PM PDT by Windcatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
Don't know if he ever gave that interview or if this was fabricated, but sounds like he just rounded up the Libertarian vote.
39 posted on 08/27/2003 4:15:31 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voice in your head
California-- home of Cheech and Chong-- will be thoroughly outraged by his use of weed and hash.

[/sarcasm]
40 posted on 08/27/2003 4:15:36 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (Willie Green for President...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
This whole thing seems... fishy. I mean, the interview was awfully descriptive for a guy who wasn't fluent in English for years into the 80's...

To be honest, I really don't care about this revelation. Does anyone expect someone living in his lifestyle to have an innocent history? Not that I am condoning it, but I could give two figs for this (or Bush's drug/alchohol past). I am voting for these candidates today, not 20 years ago. If this all happened in 1997 I would be much more concerned...
41 posted on 08/27/2003 4:16:42 PM PDT by Middle Aged White Male
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
Lucky bastard!
42 posted on 08/27/2003 4:16:49 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Yeah, that means in the 70's he lived his 20's

Still an adult.

43 posted on 08/27/2003 4:17:11 PM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
That's kind of a half truth there FC. His "appreciation" of the homosexuals who liked his body (by his own explanation) was because they were buying magazines he was appearing in, which was driving up sales, which in turn was driving up his appearance fee.

Most smart business men appreciate people that make them money.
44 posted on 08/27/2003 4:17:17 PM PDT by discostu (just a tuna sandwich from another catering service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
What is the point of bringing up something Arnold said 26 years ago? People change. They grow up, get married, have children.

"It is all about sex! Nothing to see here, move on."

Would love to see the responses here if the man giving that interview was one William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.

45 posted on 08/27/2003 4:18:30 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
It is slander to use such fodder in a manner as if it still has relevance today. If you think that such a disingeuous ploy to disparage the man isn't a slanderous I'm sure that your fine with the people whom tried to take advantage of GWB past indiscretions in which he to has admitted to and atoned for.

46 posted on 08/27/2003 4:18:43 PM PDT by Tempest (Tom McNader, Cruz Bustamante couldn't have asked for a better friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Enterprise: So, Mr. Schwarzenneger, what were you doing during the 70's?

Arnold: "Sex and pot."

Enterprise: I see. And you, Mr. Bustamante, what were you doing during the 70's?

Bustamante: "I was a member of a group which advocates violence and racism."

47 posted on 08/27/2003 4:18:54 PM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
LOL!!! Arnies a shoe in!!
48 posted on 08/27/2003 4:18:54 PM PDT by zarf (Dan Rather is god.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher
BINGO, that is exactly correct, especially in hyper-sexed California... What a miss calculation.
49 posted on 08/27/2003 4:19:07 PM PDT by Porterville (Et tu liberal?? Et tu???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher
What's dirty about it is the insinuation that he's unfit to serve as Governor. That somehow this makes him incapable of the job.

It's not dirty. He did these things. He publicly talked about them. It is perfectly legitimate to question his fitness for office based on this behavior. I clearly recall Bill Clinton getting a lot of heat for his drug use. Many candidates have been disqualified in the minds of the voters because of drugs and "immoral" behavior.

In California, I doubt that admitted marijuana usage (a long time ago) and a vigorous sex drive (in an unmarried man) will be seen as disqualifying. The language is what may put people off.

It may be ugly to watch, but it isn't dirty. Sometimes the truth can be painful.

50 posted on 08/27/2003 4:19:11 PM PDT by Earl B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 651-685 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson