Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OUI, OUI: ARNOLD PUMPS UP ORGIES AND DOPE IN '77 SHOCK INTERVIEW
Drudge Report ^

Posted on 08/27/2003 3:59:45 PM PDT by journey7873

Posted on Drudge and Smoking Gun: The California recall campaign is officially getting dirty...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 26kdollarwelfaretom; arnold; big10inch; bobmulholland; bustamentebooster; disgusting; drudgethinksfriswhat; gain4inchesovernight; lookingforbooty; moretocome; morons; schwarzenpervert; schwarzenrino; sick; theorgycandidate; vote4character; vote4mcclintock; warningshot; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 201-250251-300301-350 ... 651-685 next last
To: AmericaUnited
Ambrose is much to innocent to understand that in the venacular, dope is grass, maybe hash, and drugs are all those other bad things.
251 posted on 08/27/2003 5:27:43 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Did you say the same thing when people were making allegations about wild sex and drugs by Bill Clinton in the 70s?

Apples and oranges.

Schwarzenegger open and honest and has changed.

Clinton evil and deceitful and never changed--just got worse.

252 posted on 08/27/2003 5:28:17 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
Finally another guy who bought the magazine for the articles!! I thought I was the only one.
253 posted on 08/27/2003 5:28:44 PM PDT by Crawdad (I cried because I had no shoes, until I met a man who had no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
It was Nancy Hernreich's sink. Wonder if that's on her resume? It certainly would get you hired in DLC circles......
254 posted on 08/27/2003 5:28:48 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
What makes you think he changed? Was it when he opposed Clinton's impeachment or when he recently explained his liberal views on sexual morality?
255 posted on 08/27/2003 5:30:12 PM PDT by evilsmoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: evilsmoker
What are you talking about? This is the one time CA can elect a true conservative.

I doubt it. My view is from afar. My best judgment is that Arnold Schwarzenegger is the only Republican that can win at this time.

Simon ran a horrible campaign during the last general election, got zero establishment (money) support and still came within 5% of winning. This is a special election, and the most motivated voters are conservatives. This is the best shot we've ever had and you want to throw it away on a baby killing, tax raising, RINO.

McClintock just doesn't have a shot at beating Bustamente. What he'll do is pull votes from Schwarzenegger. Please note that RATS have one candidate and Republicans have two. This is a prescription for disaster. For RAT victory

256 posted on 08/27/2003 5:30:30 PM PDT by dennisw (G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
We want a Republican who won't destroy the state with taxes and socialist agendas. Arnold is rough around the edges, but that might just be what we need in Sacremento, a frickin' buzz saw who will have a tantrum when thos selfish greedy SOBs (Republican and Democrat) in Sac give out more money to the Unions and the retirement programs for administrations and higher ups which bars the rest of us from getting into the system while sucking money from the private sector and chasing away business, so we have trouble paying our mortgage and car payments. Ignorant SOBs shouldn't be the rich in this state, but since the rich her are in administration in the public sector jobs, there is no interest in cutting taxes what so ever. We are dying outhere and Sacremento is playing reindeer games. I'm sick of it.
257 posted on 08/27/2003 5:31:25 PM PDT by Porterville (Et tu liberal?? Et tu???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Bill Clinton's partying didn't get a pass from freepers

Bill did it in the White House, then pretended to know English only as a second language. He did all he did from the position of power, as an elected oficial - governor and president. "I smoked but did not inhale"... this is the idiocy. Not that he smoked and inhaled. You will not hear such noncence from governor Arnold.
258 posted on 08/27/2003 5:31:44 PM PDT by singsong (Demoralization does not kill people, it kills civilizations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
Just damn.
259 posted on 08/27/2003 5:31:57 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (This is hughly series, please be spefic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
you are SUCH idiots!
260 posted on 08/27/2003 5:33:08 PM PDT by tomintexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
like greg louganis and rudy galindo
261 posted on 08/27/2003 5:33:42 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
President Bush *NEVER* used illegal drugs. That is a bald-faced *LIE* perpetrated by the *MEDIA*. I am *DISAPPOINTED* that any Freeper would fall for that one.

He was also a virgin until he married.

262 posted on 08/27/2003 5:33:44 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
It's old news. Let's move on.
263 posted on 08/27/2003 5:34:19 PM PDT by zarf (Dan Rather is god.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
Do you really want to know or are you being sarcastic?

Briefly I can tell you that we are not to judge a mans soul - nor damn him to hell - only G_d can do that. We are not to judge according to our own righteousness - but instead judge according to the Judgment already made by G_d.

Jesus tells us to judge all things, to judge the fruit of a man, to judge each other in the ways of the Lord. For us to obey Christ and be light we must judge the darkness.

We are to determine right and wrong and stand against wrong.

Many people confuse the meaning of the word Judge when taken out of context or leave out the clarifiers. The Context of Mat. 7 is pretty clear that Judgment of sin is alright, for a non hypocrite

1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.

2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Mk. 4.24

3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?

5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.

6 Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.



I can give you many chapters and verses if you like, but I doubt you would.
264 posted on 08/27/2003 5:34:33 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (SELECT * FROM liberals WHERE clue > 0 .............................................. 0 rows returned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
The title of this thread is probably a fairly good clue.
265 posted on 08/27/2003 5:34:43 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Stop the violins!! Visualize whirled peas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
What is the point of bringing up something Bill Clinton and his brother did 26 years ago? But Freepers were fixated on Clinton's alleged sex antics of the 1970s and 80s - - - but DON'T TELL US ABOUT ARNOLD, AND THAT'S AN ORDER!

The thing I find most comical is that most young men wants to have sex with as many women as possible (or at least 98% do). Most younger people have smoked pot. The ones that criticize Arnold the loudest about this stuff are just envious. What he did 20 years ago amounts to nothing. He grew up. I wish I coud have had the sex romps he did when I was 29...LMAO

266 posted on 08/27/2003 5:35:49 PM PDT by Moosefart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
"Not Tom McClintock, or most decent conservatives for that matter."

I find it hard to relate to someone who didn't have at least some youthful indescretions, whether it was sex, drinking, smoking pot, whatever.

Citizens who have seen the error of their ways usually make the best leaders.

267 posted on 08/27/2003 5:36:22 PM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
McClintock was probably working hard, obeying the laws, and setting a good example for others.

I hope he managed to have some fun.....

268 posted on 08/27/2003 5:36:30 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (This is hughly series, please be spefic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
So you compare a by-then-married Schwarzenegger lying to clean up his image in a Playboy article in '88 to clinton's politically expedient lies?

Ach!

The only lie that would compare is if at this time during the campaign he lies about it.

Best to be frank and disavow. Clearly his values and lifestyle did in fact change dramatically.
269 posted on 08/27/2003 5:36:37 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Moosefart
Perhaps there is an Arnold Girls Gone Wild video out there...

>>>I wish I coud have had the sex romps he did when I was 29...LMAO
270 posted on 08/27/2003 5:37:54 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
So you are clearly against Bush and Reagan, not to mention Tom and Myself?

Though I would ask: When have I foisted my intemperance and intolerance your way?
271 posted on 08/27/2003 5:38:03 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (SELECT * FROM liberals WHERE clue > 0 .............................................. 0 rows returned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
As for your posting the other thread, I am going to withdraw my charge completely. If I can't prove it, I shouldn't make the charge or voice my opinion. I am sorry. I shouldn't have made the accusation. Your take on that was correct.

Thanks man.

272 posted on 08/27/2003 5:38:20 PM PDT by journey7873
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
So I suppose we are supposed to say "Oh my God" or something?
273 posted on 08/27/2003 5:38:32 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

I do not agree with what you say. His language used in the Playboy interview in 1988 was Clintonian: it gave him an out if you consider pot and hash to be less than "drugs" (speed, coke, heroin, barbituates). He admits to marijuana use today. What part of that don't you understand.

Jesus. The one good thing about McClintock is that he is not as clueless as some of his devoted followers. He'll know when to get out when the getting's good.

This is election for Governor, not for Pope.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

274 posted on 08/27/2003 5:38:39 PM PDT by section9 (To read my blog, click on the Major!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
McKlintock didn't stop the unions from sucking the money from the state.... I don't care if he goes either... I hear NO politicians saying anything about the number 1 problem in the state: UNIONS
275 posted on 08/27/2003 5:38:49 PM PDT by Porterville (Et tu liberal?? Et tu???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
1. I hope Arnold wasn't bragging, it's very typical of some men to kiss and tell.

2. What role does Gray Davis play in all of this? he is
known to demonize his opponents by digging up dirt on
them.

3. Somebody should have kept Arnold in the closet until his
hormones hit his head.
276 posted on 08/27/2003 5:39:06 PM PDT by Chantal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
That's what I think.....
277 posted on 08/27/2003 5:39:56 PM PDT by OldFriend ((Dems inhabit a parallel universe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
I recall Bill Clinton getting a lot of heat for not being candid about his drug use.

Yes, that's what I recall too, in fact it was unbridled laughter at that dumb "didn't inhale" assertion. Smoking a joint in the 60s or 70s was nothing, but in the 90s and 00s suddenly it's a liability? Yes a liablility for current use, but shouldn't be for "in context," if you will, previous use.

278 posted on 08/27/2003 5:40:17 PM PDT by Vladivostok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777; churchillbuff
I appreciate your reply. I just don't understand how some people feel that they have the right to judge and criticize others that they do not know and then act as if they are perfectly pure.

Sounds like hypocrisy to me.

279 posted on 08/27/2003 5:40:39 PM PDT by Eaker (This is OUR country; let's take it back!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

The Dems finally get to show off the one thing they're good at - mudslinging.

280 posted on 08/27/2003 5:40:39 PM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dyno35
"Not Tom McClintock, or most decent conservatives for that matter." I find it hard to relate to someone who didn't have at least some youthful indescretions, whether it was sex, drinking, smoking pot, whatever. Citizens who have seen the error of their ways usually make the best leaders.

I didn't say that I had not gotten drunk or tipped over trash cans as a youth, but that's a far cry from the kind of depravity discussed in the above article.

281 posted on 08/27/2003 5:40:49 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (It's time for Arnold to stop splitting the Republican vote and step aside for the good of the party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: tomintexas
Debka reported this 6 weeks ago
282 posted on 08/27/2003 5:40:50 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thanks Jim, I'm tired of people now trying to dig up all the dirt on Arnold they can find. He's probably the only chance we have here in California to make it through this mess!!

Those of us that live here and don't want our land annexed with Mexico and don't want to PAY MORE TAXES don't want Bustamante as our Governor. A lot have already decided to leave if that happens, we cannot fight any more.

283 posted on 08/27/2003 5:40:51 PM PDT by WestCoastGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
This post wasn't placed on this forum by democats.  If you've been on the forum for the last few days, you know who it was posted by.  Today ABC reports that McClintock is at 11% and Schwarzenegger is at 45%.  Now you figure out if we have anything to lose by this type of post and tactics continuing on this forum?
 
284 posted on 08/27/2003 5:41:29 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Vladivostok
Hear, hear.

What's worse than doing something questionable? LYING about it. Arnold should just take it head on. People respect honesty.
285 posted on 08/27/2003 5:42:39 PM PDT by Windcatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Chantal
I don't know and I don't care.

'77 has no bearing on this election - unless he has not changed, which I see no evidence of.

I am more concerned about his stances now.

But then I am just an idiot and a social conservative who is destroying the world! lol

I see shrills on both side.
286 posted on 08/27/2003 5:42:43 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (SELECT * FROM liberals WHERE clue > 0 .............................................. 0 rows returned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
A standard line from liberals against conservatives is they want a man in power who, um, has a healthy sex life.

Concern answered with Arnold.

287 posted on 08/27/2003 5:42:56 PM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
So he was a kid in the 70's, what was Bustamonte doing??? Huffington???? Davis???? The answer is the same for each.

Bustamonte was and is trying to annex the southwest into Mexico, trying to tear apart a nation, to bring 1/4 of the US into a third world country. He needs to be exposed, big time. Forget Arnolds exposure, he wanted to join the US not annex 1/4 of with out their permission!!!!! Expose bustamonte!
288 posted on 08/27/2003 5:43:15 PM PDT by Ethyl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dyno35
I find it hard to relate to someone who didn't have at least some youthful indescretions, whether it was sex, drinking, smoking pot, whatever. Citizens who have seen the error of their ways usually make the best leaders.

Wowsers... what we are witnessing here is the Clintonification of the Free Republic.

Slouching Towards Gomorrah ...

289 posted on 08/27/2003 5:43:16 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

Schwarzenegger open and honest and has changed.

Has this been settled?

One of the errors in jumping early on the Arnold bandwagon is that one had to ignore that there are a lot of similar questions about Schwarzenegger's personal life which persist to this day.

Better to have waited, to see what might shake loose during the course of the campaign.


290 posted on 08/27/2003 5:43:54 PM PDT by Sabertooth (Viva la 187!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Arnold is rough around the edges, but that might just be what we need in Sacremento

I understand your frustration at the Employee Unions, the Marxist Legislatureect and that is fine. But this is the WRONG battlefield to be fighting THEM on. That article is quite disgustingly vulger, and I'm a young guy so it takes alot to be offended these days. More importantly, trying to blow it off compromises Conservatives. You want him in there, fine, but don't rationalize this, and if some Demo brings it up, give ground because you have to. Its something he can do some mea culpas and be forgiven about and it forgotten, but DON'T MAKE EXCUSES FOR IT BEFORE THEN BECAUSE YOU WANT HIM IN POWER. That is very bad, from a precident standpoint, as well as an intellectually consistent one.

Lets just pretend this never was published, but if its brought up, never say its ok to do what he did with that girl.

291 posted on 08/27/2003 5:44:16 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Stop Dividing the Republican base; vote McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
I am making no such judgments on his past.

G_d knows I have needed forgiveness more than once.

My stance is on him today - this hit piece gets no applause from me.
292 posted on 08/27/2003 5:44:28 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (SELECT * FROM liberals WHERE clue > 0 .............................................. 0 rows returned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
The "LOL" was intended to alert you that this was a joke. Sorry if it didn't come across clearly. What I meant by my post was: don't you want to wait until closer to the election, view the landscape at that time, and then weigh your decision against the developments? What if the Dems scare up a phony business scandal or tax scandal against McClintock at the last minute, (which he doesn't have time to debunk) like they did with Simon? What would you do if the race really IS between just Arnold and Cruz?
293 posted on 08/27/2003 5:44:33 PM PDT by alwaysconservative (Which party represents the working people?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Ethyl
They're exposing him on FOX... I was suprised that even FOX was brave enough to call a racist democrat pig a racist democrat pig.
294 posted on 08/27/2003 5:44:48 PM PDT by Porterville (Et tu liberal?? Et tu???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
I see shrills on both side.

There's a lot o' that going around, with cries of "Unelectable! You must 'want' Bustamante!" competing with "Rino Schwarzenkennedy baby-killer sellout!" Fortunately, that hasn't much spread to the candidates themselves (has it??).
295 posted on 08/27/2003 5:45:25 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Conservatism is dead. This thread has convinced me of that.

My past isn't lily white but after reading that article I wanted to throw up. Arnold is disgusting.
296 posted on 08/27/2003 5:45:38 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Proud card carrying member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy since 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I agree -- that's why Arnold needs to drop out. And as a Californian, I can tell you that Simon did not lose because of his conservative idealogy, he lost because Davis spent $10 million bucks on commercials calling him a crook. The charges were not even true. What's going to happen when the Dems go after Arnold? They won't even have to make stuff up.
297 posted on 08/27/2003 5:46:29 PM PDT by evilsmoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: section9
I do not agree with what you say. His language used in the Playboy interview in 1988 was Clintonian: it gave him an out if you consider pot and hash to be less than "drugs" (speed, coke, heroin, barbituates).

PLAYBOY: What about other drugs; have you done them?

SCHWARZENEGGER: Never in my entire life. When I came to America, someone gave me a drug like speed. He told me it would make me sharper and I'd lose weight. But I lost muscle tone. It was like having a hard-on that's not hard, that is half limp. I don't like that. I like to feel fully pumped. I threw the pills away. Nor has anyone so much as smoked a joint when I was there. Or sniffed coke. Or taken any drugs. In Hollywood, I have never seen any drugs on the set or anywhere. It could be because people know me well enough to know that I don't want anything like that. I'm around actors all the time -- and I've worked with them in Mexico, on jungle locations where you'd think it might happen just to pass the time -- and I've never seen it.

298 posted on 08/27/2003 5:46:31 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal
Thanks Jim, I'm tired of people now trying to dig up all the dirt on Arnold they can find. He's probably the only chance we have here in California to make it through this mess!!

Jim wasn't siding with you or Arnold. He was siding with the decent standards where this kind of thing is considered revolting. Now if we could only ban the pervert from the Governor's office.

299 posted on 08/27/2003 5:46:49 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (It's time for Arnold to stop splitting the Republican vote and step aside for the good of the party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Ethyl
Bustamonte was and is trying to annex the southwest into Mexico, trying to tear apart a nation, to bring 1/4 of the US into a third world country. He needs to be exposed, big time. Forget Arnolds exposure, he wanted to join the US not annex 1/4 of with out their permission!!!!! Expose bustamonte!

Here is what Bustamecha was doing.......

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/970020/posts

300 posted on 08/27/2003 5:47:09 PM PDT by WestCoastGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 201-250251-300301-350 ... 651-685 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson