Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OUI, OUI: ARNOLD PUMPS UP ORGIES AND DOPE IN '77 SHOCK INTERVIEW
Drudge Report ^

Posted on 08/27/2003 3:59:45 PM PDT by journey7873

Posted on Drudge and Smoking Gun: The California recall campaign is officially getting dirty...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 26kdollarwelfaretom; arnold; big10inch; bobmulholland; bustamentebooster; disgusting; drudgethinksfriswhat; gain4inchesovernight; lookingforbooty; moretocome; morons; schwarzenpervert; schwarzenrino; sick; theorgycandidate; vote4character; vote4mcclintock; warningshot; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 251-300301-350351-400 ... 651-685 next last
To: Porterville
He was the only senator to vote against the big raises for the prison guards unions.
301 posted on 08/27/2003 5:47:16 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
That you include yourself with Bush, Reagan and Tom is a hoot!

Right now, the first line of the post I am responding to, was erroneous and deceitful,and a further attempt to 'foist'. You could show AS supporters the same courtesy that most of the AS supporters are showing McC, but will you? Nope. You'll keep embarrassing yourself and trying to divide the ticket. And I'll keep laughing and ridiculing.

302 posted on 08/27/2003 5:47:22 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino
Why are all of Schwarzenegger's interviews

Your first mistake is using present tense. Your second is assuming these two interviews comprise "all" of those he's given!

LOL

303 posted on 08/27/2003 5:47:34 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
It wasn't moral and he should have been aware of how stupid it is to brag about such an immoral action. But, if an outsider wants to go to Sacremento and toss out the unions, well I'd even vote Liberatarian.
304 posted on 08/27/2003 5:47:35 PM PDT by Porterville (Et tu liberal?? Et tu???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

This post wasn't placed on this forum by democats.  If you've been on the forum for the last few days, you know who it was posted by.  Today ABC reports that McClintock is at 11% and Schwarzenegger is at 45%.  Now you figure out if we have anything to lose by this type of post and tactics continuing on this forum?

The point I'm making is the point I made some time ago: that it's because of the flat-out inevitability of stories like this one (you think it will be the last?) that the GOP has a great deal to lose because of the premature bandwagon for Arnold.


305 posted on 08/27/2003 5:48:04 PM PDT by Sabertooth (Viva la 187!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
but if its brought up, never say its ok to do what he did with that girl.

Thank you.

306 posted on 08/27/2003 5:48:29 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Proud card carrying member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy since 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
The only one??? I might actually like this guy.... how is he on the Firefighter unions and Police unions that keep young aspiring cops and firefighters from getting jobs???
307 posted on 08/27/2003 5:48:44 PM PDT by Porterville (Et tu liberal?? Et tu???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Arnold can win this. The real problem with California is the economic situation. Anyone that can win Milton Friedman's approval has mine. The whole nation will benefit if Arnold enacts the pro-growth lower tax agenda he is talking about.

Look, it's this simple:

Would I rather have McClintock? Yes. Do I think he can win? No.

Would I rather have Arnold or Bustamante? Arnold!

Bustamante has already pledged to raise taxes and is pro-abortion as opposed to pro-choice.
308 posted on 08/27/2003 5:48:48 PM PDT by zencat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777; churchillbuff
I appreciate that and appreciate your responses. My original post was to Mr. Perfect, churchillbuff.
309 posted on 08/27/2003 5:49:03 PM PDT by Eaker (This is OUR country; let's take it back!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
He was the only senator to vote against the big raises for the prison guards unions.

I hadn't known that. I'm amazed that some of the other GOP members didn't vote no. What'd they do, just not show up (because they knew the measure had a veto-proof majority)?
310 posted on 08/27/2003 5:49:29 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Jim,
I love what you've done with FR, but this censorship seems to be the antithesis of FR's goals and values.

-sdk
311 posted on 08/27/2003 5:49:52 PM PDT by sdk7x7 ("This time I think the Americans are serious. Bush is not like Clinton. I think this is the end.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal
Oops forgot the link to Mecha/Azatlan subject discussed here yesterday.



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/970020/posts
312 posted on 08/27/2003 5:50:46 PM PDT by WestCoastGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: section9
Chris...way, way too much common sense for Churchill...but thank you. Can't wait to see the replies you get!
313 posted on 08/27/2003 5:51:33 PM PDT by Hildy (Vote McClintock and get Bustamante.... hope you're happy....amigos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Ethyl
So he was a kid in the 70's, what was Bustamonte doing??? Huffington???? Davis???? The answer is the same for each.

Darryl Issa was stealing cars and I never got the feeling Issa was still a car theif. It was 26 years ago!

314 posted on 08/27/2003 5:51:50 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (Why is the Left afraid of Arnold?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: KellyAdmirer
A standard line from liberals against conservatives is they want a man in power who, um, has a healthy sex life.
Concern answered with Arnold.

We've got a winner

315 posted on 08/27/2003 5:52:53 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (This is hughly series, please be spefic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Oops, "thief" ... not "theif".
316 posted on 08/27/2003 5:52:56 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (Why is the Left afraid of Arnold?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
If that's the worst that is available, then I don't see a problem. I'm surprised it wasn't worse...
317 posted on 08/27/2003 5:54:14 PM PDT by Maigrey (Proud member of Logan's Legion (Have you had your Logan Fix today?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
The only one??? I might actually like this guy.... how is he on the Firefighter unions and Police unions that keep young aspiring cops and firefighters from getting jobs???

McClintock has been against all of the union raises. McClintock never gets a dime from the state GOP - they hate him because he's not a "team player" (i.e., corrupt). He'd truly shake things up if elected.

318 posted on 08/27/2003 5:54:54 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
never say its ok to do what he did with that girl.

If it was consensual, and it was, then it is okay, regardless of your values.

319 posted on 08/27/2003 5:55:08 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7
The material is inappropriate for FR. Sorry.
320 posted on 08/27/2003 5:56:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
You are right, 100%. V's wife.
321 posted on 08/27/2003 5:56:13 PM PDT by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
The very link you provided shows that he admitted to using drugs, if you read it carefully. He says that some guy gave him something like speed when he came to America, and told him he would lose weight. He didn't lose weight, he lost muscle tone, so he threw the pills away. (How do you admit that you lost muscle tone instead of weight if you are denying that you took the drug?) I got the impression that he understood and answered the question regarding drug usage to mean at the time of the interview, which he denied, by explaining that he'd been there and done that, and chose not to do it for the sake of his body. If you take just one line out of the paragraph, you don't get the whole answer, and the whole answer doesn't support your belief that he lied about it.
322 posted on 08/27/2003 5:56:45 PM PDT by alwaysconservative (Which party represents the working people?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
How is he on the 90% retirement benefit packages to the jackals in public service???
323 posted on 08/27/2003 5:56:50 PM PDT by Porterville (Et tu liberal?? Et tu???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: prarie earth
Moral standards have declined so much that this old interview would hardly raise an eyebrow in "liberated" CA, would it?
324 posted on 08/27/2003 5:57:41 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey; ambrose; Sabertooth
If that's the worst that is available, then I don't see a problem

But is it? That's the troubling question. As ambrose and Saber pointed out earlier here, the Dems' axe-man Bob Mulholland threw out some strip-club dirt at then-Senate candidate Herschensohn just before the '92 election. Could have helped bestow Barbara Boxer upon us. Point is, what if anything are Bob & Co. keeping on ice (about Arnold) until late in the game?
325 posted on 08/27/2003 5:57:45 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: All
Now I just discovered that the world of bodybuilding in the 70s was sleazy and seedy. Who would have thunk it?? My illusions of it being a reputable and noble profession have been forever shattered. [/sarcasm off]

I hope Arnold doesn't bring his sleaze from 27 years ago into the fine institution of politics. Oh wait, his opponents just did.

326 posted on 08/27/2003 5:58:15 PM PDT by proust (Cthulhu for president! Why vote for the lesser of two evils?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
you know what? I was doing the same things back in '77

I was raised at the tail end of the 'sexual revolution' where people who should have known better were teaching that 'if it feels good, do it'

I grew out of it. You would think you would not have to learn on your own that 'virtue is it's own reward' but it is amazing when you finally do.
327 posted on 08/27/2003 5:59:21 PM PDT by Mr. K (mwk_14059 on yahoo IM - why dont we have a FR chat yet Jim? (i can give you the code))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
How many Freepers are taking place in those polls bud?

What do you want me to do about it? Every Schwarznegger defender on this forum has stated they will vote for McClintock if he can get his numbers up.

Please look around before posting about premature support.
328 posted on 08/27/2003 5:59:32 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
Conservatism is dead.

I hope you're wrong. I hope its just the death of the religious right, typlifying those with whom I am disgusted.

329 posted on 08/27/2003 5:59:36 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: alwaysconservative
Oh c'mon... he said that no ever even smoke a joint in his presence nor did drugs of any kind. The denial was emphatic as can be. Just like "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." Oh, but what did he mean by "sexual relations" the rats asked... Now we have to define what he meant by drugs. The Clintonification of the Free Republic. BLah.
330 posted on 08/27/2003 6:00:09 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Not a one of us would be surprised at an interview like that from Billy Bob - and I am not surprised at something like that from Arnold, though I doubt that the interview as published Wee Wee is not without editorial embellishments - poetic license, if you will.
331 posted on 08/27/2003 6:00:23 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
On homosexual issues, he will have some say, but not on abortion issues. He does not support redefining marriage to include same sex marriages. So I think the exposure in this area is rather minimal.

The recall is about the fiscal disaster the state is in. Arnold can win this election and set the state finances aright. Social issues are not on the front burner for this election, and no one could make any claims for a mandate in that area.

While some Calis might be swayed by Arnold's social stands, I very much doubt anyone on FR will be. Nor will any person who believes in the sanctity of unborn life, and the evil of homosexuality.
332 posted on 08/27/2003 6:00:27 PM PDT by TheDon (Why do liberals always side with the enemies of the US?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: All
I think this will actually help him! He's running for Governor of CALIFORNIA, not POTUS.

Even during the 70s Sex Revolution, he was honest...candid. Smoked dope like everybody else. Obviously not homophobic, though very heterosexual, yet very gay-friendly. Fundamentalist athlete, yet gentle and sensitive. Oozes tolerance!

It could be a LANDSLIDE for Arnold!...but only here in the Hotel California, of course.

This wouldn't play well in Peoria....nahhhh....

333 posted on 08/27/2003 6:00:30 PM PDT by O Neill (Oh we're out here havin' fun, in the warm California sun...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: evilsmoker
Arnie drops out? Okay, McC still gets 20% and loses. Happy now?
334 posted on 08/27/2003 6:00:40 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Not a one of us would be surprised at an interview like that from Billy Bob - and I am not surprised at something like that from Arnold, though I doubt that the interview as published in Wee Wee is not without editorial embellishments - poetic license, if you will.
335 posted on 08/27/2003 6:00:48 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
It was 26 years ago!

Hmm, I only have a hazy recollection about 1977. Something to do with Tai sticks, 40 ouncers and frat parties. Ah, misspent youth!

336 posted on 08/27/2003 6:00:58 PM PDT by Snerfling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Strange that you ignore his recent admission of marijuana use.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

337 posted on 08/27/2003 6:01:21 PM PDT by section9 (To read my blog, click on the Major!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
He's wrong, we are just amazed at the level of destrucion and we are collecting our senses. And we are getting ready to move to Israel where religion is protected.
338 posted on 08/27/2003 6:01:25 PM PDT by Porterville (Et tu liberal?? Et tu???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Voice in your head
That's right; and he was an equal opportunity sex provider, something that all the libs who care about minorities should love. I really do not care what he did as far as this topic goes when he was 29. If he committed murder or rape, then I would care.... This should not hurt him.
339 posted on 08/27/2003 6:02:24 PM PDT by Donna Lee Nardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher
Did you miss the entire impeachment proceedings and the following of it here on FR? It was not about sex. It was about whether or not a woman could obtain her day in court, could present that court with testimony, and whether the testimony would be truthful. It first and foremost was a test of whether or not a woman could legitimately make the charge that she had been sexualy harrassed and solicited with the implied promise of a gain in job status, an illegal act in Arkansas and DC, and whether that case could follow the legal path to a court hearing even if the perp was the President of the US. Clinton denied her that. Get your facts straight. And remember, character counts. V's wife.
340 posted on 08/27/2003 6:02:34 PM PDT by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
Depends on how you define conservatism. *I* define it as wanting to bring this country (especially the Constitution and associated laws) back toward where the Founders originally intended.

I'd like to see *real* teeth in the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, and all of the remaining Amenements to once again be ironclad (not just the First). I call this Constitutional conservatism.

Would I like to see more moral behavior and a culture that hearkens more toward our past (that is, social conservatism)? Sure, but how do you enforce that, especially in California? More than a hearts-minds-issue, it's a cultural issue. short of God striking down Hollywood and nigh every TV personality (and leftist) there is, I don't see anything changing for the better. From what I can see, cultures tend to change on their own; it's very hard for humans to force cultural change. Since the wackos have a stranglehold on *all* of our cultural outlets, I guess I just don't see any way to really effect change (short of buying all the liberal outlets up).
341 posted on 08/27/2003 6:03:46 PM PDT by Windcatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Please look around before posting about premature support.

Anyone saying at this stage that "only Arnold can win,"and who is therefore supporting him on that basis, is doing so very prematurely.

I've looked around, and there are tons of them in this forum.


342 posted on 08/27/2003 6:04:19 PM PDT by Sabertooth (If Proposition #187 were on the ballot this October, would Arnold or Tom vote for it again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Unforetunately, the bandwagon for McC will not grow. The needed electorate will not turn out for him.
343 posted on 08/27/2003 6:04:22 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
He understood the meaning of "is" alright. That is why he was so embarrassed to be a Republican during the impeachment and thought seriously of leaving the party. Committing perjury is fine, not an impeachable offense so says Arnold.
344 posted on 08/27/2003 6:04:24 PM PDT by Two-Bits (God Bless our Country, Our Military and their families, and President Bush!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Bizarre. The dissolution of the Roman Republic bizarre and its parallels to today not worthy of consideration? At the very least, rent Gladiator. V's wife.
345 posted on 08/27/2003 6:04:56 PM PDT by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: carbon14
Attached picture of patriot MadClintock will substitute until you provide actual military service picture:

See, this is why people just like you are destroying the GOP. I don't even think this story is a big deal for this election, but its just another launch pad into an unrelated INSANE rant by you hyperpartisans that will dive to any depth for your guy. How did McClintock get involved with this goofball? Are you thinking that attacking him makes you feel like a big man? Like I said before, this is a loss for (R)nold, deal with it. He can say it was in the past and he doesn't think doing what he did to that girl was appropriate and no one should judge him, but to rationalize this, actually to just attack "the other guy" because you value political power is so brazenly greedily will turn off the independents who see you as nothing but an immoral government controling utter hypocrite.

It happened along time ago, stop rationalizing it and just forget about it.

346 posted on 08/27/2003 6:07:46 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Stop Dividing the Republican base; vote McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
I hope its just the death of the religious right, typlifying those with whom I am disgusted.

One doesn't have to be a member of the 'religious right' in order to have basic standards of decency. I know atheists and pagans with better character than Arnold.

347 posted on 08/27/2003 6:07:57 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Proud card carrying member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy since 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: journey7873; All
First of all this is ugly stuff, and it is what the rats said they were going to do, and it stinks! Second of all, most Californians are not any less disgusted by this than the rest of you. How ridiculous of freepers to say such things as if we are all a bunch of sexed up pot heads with no morals. I for one am sick to death of this kind of thing on FreeRepublic.
348 posted on 08/27/2003 6:08:28 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
That was a very interesting statement, thank you.
349 posted on 08/27/2003 6:08:58 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Well you may have found a ton of something, but it wasn't Schwarzenneger defenders saying they wouldn't vote for McClintock under any circumstance. Find one poster of the Arnold is Bustamante set who would vote for Scwarzenegger under any circumstances. I rest my case.

So you come down on the side of trashing Arnold 24/7?
350 posted on 08/27/2003 6:09:02 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 251-300301-350351-400 ... 651-685 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson