Skip to comments.
No-smoking issue dominates Springfield City Council meeting again
KY3 TV ^
| 8/26/03
| Christine Bielawski
Posted on 08/27/2003 4:11:13 PM PDT by Just another Joe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
To: Publius6961
I'm a regular-sized guy, thanks.
To: Publius6961
I like to think of myself as a classic liberal.
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Thanks for all the input to the debate. NOT!
So, you think of yourself as a classic liberal? Seeing the thoughts you've added to this thread you should really take away the 'classic' from that label.
23
posted on
08/28/2003 7:30:59 AM PDT
by
Just another Joe
(FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: Just another Joe
Smoke em if you got em.
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Smoke em if you got em.I do, thanks.
Anything to add to the actual debate on private property rights?
25
posted on
08/28/2003 7:42:45 AM PDT
by
Just another Joe
(FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: Just another Joe
My feelings about smoking are health-related. Private property is the basis for Western Civilization.
To: Eric in the Ozarks
An ungergrad friend of mine who went on to medical school came up with a theory that healthy males had "20 pack-years" (a pack a day for 20 years) before irreversible damage would occur to lung tissue. He further theorized that 15 years of smoke free breathing was required before lungs would repair themselves. I can't think of a single thing smoking adds to life on Earth. American Indians should be paying reparations...Theorizing doesn't count for much...... facts do, and the facts are still being debated.
27
posted on
08/28/2003 10:36:41 AM PDT
by
Great Dane
(You can smoke just about everywhere in Denmark.)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
You're right off the Obnoxious-O-Meter.
Quit! presuming to lecture adults on how their lives should be led (while you still can.)
To: Just another Joe
Because some so called conservatives have merged with liberals in agreement that fascism is good as long as it's for their pet cause.
29
posted on
08/28/2003 11:31:07 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: Madame Dufarge
No lecture intended.
To: Eric in the Ozarks
I like to think of myself as a classic liberal.Which of course means that you oppose any violation of private property rights and therefore oppose anti-smoking laws. Correct?
31
posted on
08/28/2003 11:35:04 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: Mark
ARE YOU ENCRYPTING YOUR MESSAGES?
lol, ME TOO.
32
posted on
08/28/2003 11:37:11 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: Great Dane
The effects of smoking have been proven since 1964. Maybe you missed that development.
The 20 pack years theory was for his Ph.D and was based on cadaver research in med school.
33
posted on
08/28/2003 11:40:56 AM PDT
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(And all these years I didn't know Philip Morris was selling life insurance...)
To: Protagoras
Private property 100 percent. Where does your share of air stop and mine begin ?
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Where does your share of air stop and mine begin ?Where the business owner says it does.
35
posted on
08/28/2003 11:48:49 AM PDT
by
Just another Joe
(FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: Just another Joe
Can't top that one.
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Private property 100 percent. Where does your share of air stop and mine begin ? At the property line of the private property.
So do you or do you not oppose the laws?
37
posted on
08/28/2003 11:52:59 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: Protagoras
I hope to see a day when no one smokes. More than 75 percent of Americans do not. Private property, the right to buy and sell and own real estate and personal property is to be respected.
However, whould you argue it is the right of a theater owner to yell "Fire" in a crowded theater because he owns the place ? I could give other coralations but you get the picture.
38
posted on
08/28/2003 12:43:45 PM PDT
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(Do you really want your kids to smoke ?)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
However, whould you argue it is the right of a theater owner to yell "Fire" in a crowded theater because he owns the place ? I could give other coralations but you get the picture.It's not a correlation and therefore I don't get the picture.
Are you for or against these laws? It seems to be a problem to get a straight answer.
39
posted on
08/28/2003 12:54:06 PM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: Protagoras
Smoking stinks and I vote with my feet. I don't think, in my heart of hearts, Springfield should have the authority to ban smoking in restaurants.
If I were a restaurant owner, I'd be ticked. However, if I worked at the restaurant, Id be pleased.
40
posted on
08/28/2003 1:00:14 PM PDT
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(Bad breath costs you $2.50/pack--enjoy !)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson