Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Weapons of Mass Destruction. About......face!
Received Email

Posted on 08/28/2003 5:46:04 PM PDT by SandRat

About......face! Weapons of Mass Destruction

This is not about Iraq, WMD, the safety of the USA, or any other virtuous undertaking . This is about the Democrats not being in control of the White House, the House or the Senate. They will do ANYTHING to get back in power, no matter what it takes.

In my humble opinion the likes of Clinton (both of them), Kerry, Levin, Byrd, Albright, Gore, Graham, Kennedy will say anything to attain their primary goal. It has nothing to do with what is right or wrong. The many statements below prove who and what they are. I am ashamed of them. Where did such hypocrites come from and how did America choose them as leaders. Lest we forget that Albright called off the weapons inspectors at a critical moment and the inspector's effort collapsed.

They are willing to bet your life that a majority of the voters are close-minded and choose to believe the big lie. They proved this to be correct in 1960, 1964, 1976 and 1992. Looks pretty likely that they will be right again; probably 2004.

Weapons of Mass Destruction

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime . He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction . So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; Unclassified; War on Terror; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 109th; antiwar; atta; bush; bush43; democrats; gwot; spying; wmd; wot
I know this has been posted before but it's worth reposting and using any time a PEACENIK, BUSH-HATER, or DummieRAT starts to open their mouths against the WOT, WMD, War in Iraq, or Pres. Bush.

How they hate the truth and conservatives with long memories.

1 posted on 08/28/2003 5:46:05 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Sounds like most of the WMD talk came from the Dems.
2 posted on 08/28/2003 5:50:14 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
There was a good one by Kerry in '98 where he said something to the effect of 'if we don't deal with Saddam now, we'll have to later' or something like that.
3 posted on 08/28/2003 5:57:22 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
4 posted on 08/28/2003 6:01:15 PM PDT by The_Macallan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
"How they hate the truth and conservatives with long memories"

Thanks to the lowly personal computer, and of course Gore's internet, the ability of Conservatives to archive and almost instantly retrieve exactly what the Dems have said in the past, has become a MIGHTY strength.

Long live Free Republic and the Era of Truth!
5 posted on 08/28/2003 6:05:18 PM PDT by spoiler2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Thanks for reposting, I'm saving it this time, it'll be good for future reference. Obviously, the Dems way of dealing with Iraq was a few cruise missiles (conveniently during the Monica trial), they must not have REALLY wanted to deal with Saddam.

6 posted on 08/28/2003 7:07:07 PM PDT by Akira (Judean People's Front? We're the People's Front of Judea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Tonight, UNSPUN with AnnaZ and Guest Hostess DIOTIMA!

Unspun with AnnaZ
July 28th, 2003 -- 10pmE/7pmP

with Special Guest Hostess

"An 'Outrages' Month"
The Diner Show

We're taking calls and
Show Starts at 10pm est/7pm pst!

Click HERE to LISTEN LIVE while you FReep!

Click HERE for the RadioFR Chat Room!

Miss a show?
Click HERE for the RadioFR Archives!

7 posted on 08/28/2003 7:07:36 PM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
The larger and more important question is: If both the Democrats and Republicans were convinced that Iraq possessed WMD and that they posed a real threat to the US; where the hell are they?
8 posted on 08/28/2003 7:29:43 PM PDT by thtr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thtr
12+ years to play hide to let everyone else play seek. Gee how could WMDs be hidden in such a short time?
9 posted on 08/28/2003 8:40:39 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Bump for later reference
10 posted on 08/28/2003 8:46:14 PM PDT by steve in DC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Nothing to see here. Move along now.
11 posted on 08/29/2003 6:58:45 AM PDT by Valin (America is a vast conspiracy to make you happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Who Said This? (Weapons of Mass Destruction)
12 posted on 01/28/2004 8:53:38 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thtr
where the hell are they?

If you have a decent Internet connection, much of the testimony of David Kay is still up at There are not many files of him there but in most of them that I have listened to he goes over what was found, what was destroyed or partially destroyed, and just how little was involved in creating the weapons once you have the know-how and the common precursor agents. Not as good as having the real thing all mixed and ready to go...but does that really matter? In the MSM it does...but that does not mean much in my view.
13 posted on 12/21/2005 7:47:36 PM PST by P-40 (
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: anyone


And remember--when you do a SEARCH on any website provider under " Danergerous democrats " --you wioll see that list Growing and growing veryday!--which is why we must always remain vigilant!

Happy Holidays Everyone !

"...Never to Forget!! Never to forgive !!! 9/11 ! "

Darth AirBorne

14 posted on 12/26/2005 5:54:59 PM PST by AirBorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson