Ministers Who Say Judge Moore Acted Improperly Need To Tear Daniel Six Out Of Their Bibles!

Food For Thought From The Chuck Wagon ^ | Aug 29, 2003 | Chuck Baldwin

[viaveritasvita]

P.S. Pay no attention to PooPoo -- he's full of it.

[Poohbah]

Gosh, it must tick you off to no end that Catholics are allowed to worship God as their consciences command, doesn't it?

[viaveritasvita]

See what I mean?

[garybob]

No where does God command the Christian to place the Ten Commandments in our courthouses.

Where does it say that the Ten Commandments have no place on our courthouses?

[O.C. - Old Cracker]

You are all tied up in knots, Poobah. My good woman of 21 years will tell you that my gate only swings one way. I'm answering your desperate, fumbling accusations only because I want to reach out to you Poobah, to get through that miasma of confusion which you probably think of as your intellect.

Find someone of the opposite sex (and make sure it ain't a trans dude/or dudette), get married and have some children. The frustration that you're now experiencing will be replaced by the day-to-day struggle to survive and raise a family in this fallen world of ours. Only when the kids are grown will you have time to do what I'm doing and enjoy your hobbies.

[garybob]

No, it tells us that Judge Moore's reliance on the preamble as enforceable law to the point of overriding the US Constitution is defective.

That's not what Judge Moore said

He said: "The battle over the Ten Commandments monument I brought into Alabama's Supreme Court is not about a monument and not about politics. (The battle is not even about religion, a term defined by our Founders as "the duty we owe to our creator and the manner for discharging it.") Federal Judge Myron Thompson, who ordered the monument's removal, and I are in perfect agreement on the fact that the issue in this case is: "Can the state acknowledge God?"

"Those were the precise words used by Judge Thompson in his closing remarks in open court. Today, I argue for the rule of law, and against any unilateral declaration of a judge to ban the acknowledgment of God in the public sector."

You need to become familiar with Judge Moores' position before you try to argue against it.

[Poohbah]

You are all tied up in knots, Poobah. My good woman of 21 years will tell you that my gate only swings one way.

Wow, you can translate "BA-A-A-AH" into English! I'm truly impressed.

I'm answering your desperate, fumbling accusations only because I want to reach out to you Poobah, to get through that miasma of confusion which you probably think of as your intellect.

Goombah, you couldn't argue your way out of a wet paper bag, as your refusal to engage my argument when you started this flame war demonstrated.

"Good breeding" does not equal "intelligence."

Find someone of the opposite sex (and make sure it ain't a trans dude/or dudette), get married and have some children.

Happily married, with a beautiful five-year-old daughter.

Now kindly STFU. You've expended what Christian charity I have.

The frustration that you're now experiencing will be replaced by the day-to-day struggle to survive and raise a family in this fallen world of ours.

Yeah, especially with all the idiots shouting "get your hands off of my God!" out there.

[O.C. - Old Cracker]

Now kindly STFU. You've expended what Christian charity I have.

"Your Honor, I rest my case."

[Poohbah]

You need to become familiar with Judge Moores' position before you try to argue against it.

I was relying on the other poster's statements. I should know better than to rely on someone who can't figure out what is and isn't a "religious test."

I do understand that Moore has deliberately gone out of his way to lose the case--he has refused excellent legal advice in favor of an extremely weak case that looked tailored to fail.

If he is sincere...pride goeth before the fall.

If he's what he seems to me...the Kingfish, wherever he is, is saying "that's it, son, good show!"

[Poohbah]

God is infinite. I am finite. Unlike you, I don't claim perfection of Christian virtue.

With that in mind...STFU.

[O.C. - Old Cracker]

Goodnight everyone. Even you, Poobah. I enjoyed every minute.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

My guess is that they considered a religious test to be a requirement that one be of a certain sect.

Better than a guess. Until fairly recently the acknowledgement of God as creator and final authority was a given on everything from the coins in our pockets to the oaths sworn in the courtroom.

I imagine most of the Founding Fathers would be shocked to see how protection from federally-supported religious taxation has morphed into denying God's existence in our daily lives.

Judge Moore has every right to do just what he chooses in the rotunda of his courthouse. And the fact that some chiseled rock causes this much consternation among the bubbleheads who pose as intellects is indicative of the petty, retrogressive, secular mudhole those in power want us to swim in.

As a society, we've abandoned any sense of moral perspective when we sanction Judge Moore and venerate Judge Judy.

[tame]

Go, via, go :o) Verbum Caro Factum Est!

[Luis Gonzalez]

Christians, not heeding what these ministers are saying, are turning theor backs on the Church, and following the politician (State) in the name of God.

And not one of you see a thing wrong with this.

[PleaseNoMore]

So, those of "us" who feel that there are bigger issues involved here are "followers" of Moore? I support Roy Moore and unashamedly so, but, I am in no way a follower of his. I place no hope in the man, only what he is, in my opinion, standing up for and against.

[TrueBeliever9]

Thanks X - an excellent brief!

[Jorge]

"Are you trying to make me laugh on purpose or what?"

No. You are the one asserting that the presence of a stone in a state building somehow is a law establishing a religion.

Wrong. I never said such a thing in any of my posts.

With all due respect, it is a ridiculous claim.

I'm merely asking which one. We will get to the other questions once you can name a religion that can be established by said stone.

No. You first need to go back and review my posts to see what my argument really was.
You've obviously lost track of the dialogue.

[nmh]

Next election pay attention to what the President does when swearing in.

[nmh]

No they've been doing the incremental dance till lately. Now with the incremental progress they have been making over the years has emboldened them.

[AndrewC]

My statement:-->No. You are the one asserting that the presence of a stone in a state building somehow is a law establishing a religion.

Wrong. I never said such a thing in any of my posts.

Isn't the following your statement?

The law Judge Moore defied was one dictating that NO ONE has the right to use the Govt to impose their religion on others.