Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Artificial intelligence meets good old-fashioned human thought
Science News ^ | Aug. 30, 2003 | Bruce Bower

Posted on 09/03/2003 12:02:02 PM PDT by js1138

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 09/03/2003 12:02:02 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic; Junior; BMCDA; CobaltBlue; ThinkPlease; PatrickHenry; Right Wing Professor; ...
Artificial Intelligence ping.
2 posted on 09/03/2003 12:05:34 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138
I often find myself wishing I had mental access to a library's worth of information.

The problem with this "cognitive prosthesis" would be in learning how to use it without being completely overwhelmed. (For example, how does one prevent every random "I wonder" thought from being interpreted as a library request?)

3 posted on 09/03/2003 12:05:57 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138; r9etb
Artificial intelligence will never overcome natural stupidity.
4 posted on 09/03/2003 12:14:29 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138
bump. good article.

Traditional AI is wrong. had/has a faulty view of human cognition ... dont have time to explain it now, but if folks are interested buzz a line. I have all the answers.
5 posted on 09/03/2003 12:19:33 PM PDT by WOSG (Lower Taxes means economic growth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138
bttt
6 posted on 09/03/2003 12:22:25 PM PDT by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb; js1138
For example, how does one prevent every random "I wonder" thought from being interpreted as a library request?

Perhaps the best approach would be to make it a subconscious sort of knowledge - e.g., you see a new insect, and without even consciously having to request the information, you just know what it is, so that the information is presented to you in the same basic way that knowledge you already have is. For example, I don't consciously think about what this is:

..I just know that it's a Tiger Swallowtail butterfly, because I learned that somewhere. So I'm not really consciously querying my memory for that information, it's just always at my fingertips as I need it, whenever I see one. And if the prosthesis functioned in that way, subconsciously retrieving and presenting information as it was needed, it would be very similar to your mental experience now, only you'd always have any information you needed at your mental fingertips. And if it came back that you still didn't know what that strange bug was, you'd know that nobody else knew either, or at least that such information wasn't stored in a form accessible to your prosthesis.

7 posted on 09/03/2003 12:28:55 PM PDT by general_re (Today is a day for firm decisions! Or is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
I have all the answers.

And I have the questions. You first.

8 posted on 09/03/2003 12:29:05 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
For example, how does one prevent every random "I wonder" thought from being interpreted as a library request?

Ever look at something without 'seeing' it while your thoughts drifted? Your mind can tune into what you want.

9 posted on 09/03/2003 12:29:49 PM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Answers B4 questins? hmmm. Ask and I'll answer tonight ... back to work.
10 posted on 09/03/2003 12:33:28 PM PDT by WOSG (Lower Taxes means economic growth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: general_re
I rather doubt any prosthetic in the near future will plug directly into our minds. I suspect you could design some really cool interfaces that could be trained to retrieve and organize information based on speech recognition, tracking our eye movements, or even interpreting our brain waves. I envision it as a very fast google that doesn't require typing.

Now if we can just get rid of those pop-ups.

11 posted on 09/03/2003 12:34:34 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: js1138
I rather doubt any prosthetic in the near future will plug directly into our minds.

So do I, but imagine the possibilities ;)

12 posted on 09/03/2003 12:38:35 PM PDT by general_re (Today is a day for firm decisions! Or is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: js1138
The answer is 42.
13 posted on 09/03/2003 12:47:51 PM PDT by Chewbacca (Stay out of debt. Pay cash. When you run out of cash, stop buying things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chewbacca
And the question is, "What do you get when you multiply six by nine?"

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=42
14 posted on 09/03/2003 12:52:14 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Chewbacca
6x9=42 (base 13)
15 posted on 09/03/2003 12:56:43 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: general_re
So I'm not really consciously querying my memory for that information, it's just always at my fingertips as I need it, whenever I see one.

That is characteristic of the class of machine the brain is. Encoding/learning information is relatively slow, but it is stored very efficiently and random access of data (and more importantly, associations) is highly optimal. The biggest problem with an brain prosthetic is the integration interface, which would basically require some modest medical nanotech to be feasible.

16 posted on 09/03/2003 12:58:38 PM PDT by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
Traditional AI is wrong.

Absolutely, though it is starting to come around. Not that a lot of AI researchers will ever give up their pet ideas; there is lots of "religion" in that crowd.

17 posted on 09/03/2003 1:01:12 PM PDT by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: *tech_index; Ernest_at_the_Beach; sourcery
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
18 posted on 09/03/2003 1:16:08 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
The biggest problem with an brain prosthetic is the integration interface, which would basically require some modest medical nanotech to be feasible.

I have always wanted a math coprocessor for my brain.

19 posted on 09/03/2003 1:28:18 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
I have always wanted a math coprocessor for my brain.

I have long suspected that such a thing would greatly improve my skill on the pool table and golf course ;)

20 posted on 09/03/2003 1:45:41 PM PDT by general_re (Today is a day for firm decisions! Or is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson