Skip to comments.
Artificial intelligence meets good old-fashioned human thought
Science News ^
| Aug. 30, 2003
| Bruce Bower
Posted on 09/03/2003 12:02:02 PM PDT by js1138
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
09/03/2003 12:02:02 PM PDT
by
js1138
To: Doctor Stochastic; Junior; BMCDA; CobaltBlue; ThinkPlease; PatrickHenry; Right Wing Professor; ...
Artificial Intelligence ping.
2
posted on
09/03/2003 12:05:34 PM PDT
by
js1138
To: js1138
I often find myself wishing I had mental access to a library's worth of information.
The problem with this "cognitive prosthesis" would be in learning how to use it without being completely overwhelmed. (For example, how does one prevent every random "I wonder" thought from being interpreted as a library request?)
3
posted on
09/03/2003 12:05:57 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: js1138; r9etb
Artificial intelligence will never overcome natural stupidity.
4
posted on
09/03/2003 12:14:29 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: js1138
bump. good article.
Traditional AI is wrong. had/has a faulty view of human cognition ... dont have time to explain it now, but if folks are interested buzz a line. I have all the answers.
5
posted on
09/03/2003 12:19:33 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(Lower Taxes means economic growth)
To: js1138
bttt
6
posted on
09/03/2003 12:22:25 PM PDT
by
ellery
To: r9etb; js1138
For example, how does one prevent every random "I wonder" thought from being interpreted as a library request? Perhaps the best approach would be to make it a subconscious sort of knowledge - e.g., you see a new insect, and without even consciously having to request the information, you just know what it is, so that the information is presented to you in the same basic way that knowledge you already have is. For example, I don't consciously think about what this is:
..I just know that it's a Tiger Swallowtail butterfly, because I learned that somewhere. So I'm not really consciously querying my memory for that information, it's just always at my fingertips as I need it, whenever I see one. And if the prosthesis functioned in that way, subconsciously retrieving and presenting information as it was needed, it would be very similar to your mental experience now, only you'd always have any information you needed at your mental fingertips. And if it came back that you still didn't know what that strange bug was, you'd know that nobody else knew either, or at least that such information wasn't stored in a form accessible to your prosthesis.
7
posted on
09/03/2003 12:28:55 PM PDT
by
general_re
(Today is a day for firm decisions! Or is it?)
To: WOSG
I have all the answers.And I have the questions. You first.
8
posted on
09/03/2003 12:29:05 PM PDT
by
js1138
To: r9etb
For example, how does one prevent every random "I wonder" thought from being interpreted as a library request?Ever look at something without 'seeing' it while your thoughts drifted? Your mind can tune into what you want.
To: js1138
Answers B4 questins? hmmm. Ask and I'll answer tonight ... back to work.
10
posted on
09/03/2003 12:33:28 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(Lower Taxes means economic growth)
To: general_re
I rather doubt any prosthetic in the near future will plug directly into our minds. I suspect you could design some really cool interfaces that could be trained to retrieve and organize information based on speech recognition, tracking our eye movements, or even interpreting our brain waves. I envision it as a very fast google that doesn't require typing.
Now if we can just get rid of those pop-ups.
11
posted on
09/03/2003 12:34:34 PM PDT
by
js1138
To: js1138
I rather doubt any prosthetic in the near future will plug directly into our minds. So do I, but imagine the possibilities ;)
12
posted on
09/03/2003 12:38:35 PM PDT
by
general_re
(Today is a day for firm decisions! Or is it?)
To: js1138
The answer is 42.
13
posted on
09/03/2003 12:47:51 PM PDT
by
Chewbacca
(Stay out of debt. Pay cash. When you run out of cash, stop buying things.)
To: Chewbacca
14
posted on
09/03/2003 12:52:14 PM PDT
by
js1138
To: Chewbacca
6x9=42 (base 13)
15
posted on
09/03/2003 12:56:43 PM PDT
by
js1138
To: general_re
So I'm not really consciously querying my memory for that information, it's just always at my fingertips as I need it, whenever I see one. That is characteristic of the class of machine the brain is. Encoding/learning information is relatively slow, but it is stored very efficiently and random access of data (and more importantly, associations) is highly optimal. The biggest problem with an brain prosthetic is the integration interface, which would basically require some modest medical nanotech to be feasible.
16
posted on
09/03/2003 12:58:38 PM PDT
by
tortoise
(All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
To: WOSG
Traditional AI is wrong. Absolutely, though it is starting to come around. Not that a lot of AI researchers will ever give up their pet ideas; there is lots of "religion" in that crowd.
17
posted on
09/03/2003 1:01:12 PM PDT
by
tortoise
(All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
To: *tech_index; Ernest_at_the_Beach; sourcery
To: tortoise
The biggest problem with an brain prosthetic is the integration interface, which would basically require some modest medical nanotech to be feasible. I have always wanted a math coprocessor for my brain.
To: Physicist
I have always wanted a math coprocessor for my brain. I have long suspected that such a thing would greatly improve my skill on the pool table and golf course ;)
20
posted on
09/03/2003 1:45:41 PM PDT
by
general_re
(Today is a day for firm decisions! Or is it?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson