Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth
"One can have societies without theocracies, yet also without establishing science as an "alternative religion." One can have the rule of law while retaining the family as the basic social unit. One can have women in the workplace without ignoring the risks of large numbers of latch-key children."

Please point out to me anywhere in the article where Peters contradicts any of those points, or even suggests that those possibilites (enthronement of science as religion, other than the family as the basic family unit, or "latch-key" children) are desirable.

You're "reading" stuff that isn't there.

40 posted on 09/04/2003 9:59:49 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog
You're "reading" stuff that isn't there.

One of us is. Peters ignored the downsides of some of the things he lauds.

Actually, what I didn't read is what wasn't there.


42 posted on 09/04/2003 10:04:36 AM PDT by Sabertooth (Arnold would let Illegals stay... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/971733/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson