Skip to comments.
McDonald's obesity lawsuit thrown out
CNNMoney.com ^
| September 4, 2003
Posted on 09/04/2003 12:40:28 PM PDT by Sweet_Sunflower29
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:04 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge Thursday threw out a refiled lawsuit against McDonald's Corp. blaming the fast food restaurant chain for obesity and health problems in children.
U.S. District Judge Robert Sweet dismissed the suit that accused McDonald's (MCD: up $0.60 to $23.29, Research, Estimates) of misleading the plaintiffs through advertising and other publicity that its food products were nutritious. Sweet had thrown out an earlier version of the suit, but had allowed the plaintiffs to refile the case with new information.
(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: childhoodobesity; foodpolice; lawsuit; pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-60 next last
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
I think I'll go down there an' get me a few Super Sizes to celebrate.
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
In other words, the judge told plaintiffs to "Shut their fat mouths!".
3
posted on
09/04/2003 12:41:59 PM PDT
by
theDentist
(Liberals can sugarcoat sh** all they want. I'm not biting.)
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
Faith in humanity meter rating up.
4
posted on
09/04/2003 12:43:22 PM PDT
by
JmyBryan
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
Dang, has the judge had an attack of sanity?
Best news I've had all day. These junk law suits are a plague.
5
posted on
09/04/2003 12:43:33 PM PDT
by
LibKill
(Heaven frowns on all things french, and democrat, AND ESPECIALLY CAT.)
To: ElectricStrawberry
Excellent news!
Hey can you pick me up 3 Big Macs, a Fish Sandwich,a chicken sandwich, French Fry, Ice Cream, 2 cheeseburgers and 4 hamburgers. That should be enough for me to celebrate. : )
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
Would you like fries with that?
7
posted on
09/04/2003 12:47:12 PM PDT
by
Godzilla
("What part of 'THOU SHALT NOT' don't you understand?")
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
I'd like to blame my extra poundage on someone else...but I know better.
ROFL at Judge "Sweet"
To: JmyBryan
Faith in humanity meter rating up. Don't be so sure. Tobacco companies won for many years before the anti-responsibility crowd finally broke through. These suits will probably be filed and refiled on diferent legal grounds until they get a win.
I recently came back from living overseas, and after I got back I noticed that some food, e.g. yogurt and Coca-Cola, was being offered in smaller containers than when I left. This suggests to me that companies expect that legal trouble is a possibility, so they're offering more choices as a way to partially immunize themselves. It will be interesting to see if McDonald's et al. start offering smaller portion sizes for those who want them.
9
posted on
09/04/2003 12:48:23 PM PDT
by
untenured
To: MotleyGirl70
...and a Diet Coke.
10
posted on
09/04/2003 12:51:39 PM PDT
by
TheBigB
(I don't believe in Astrology. We Scorpios are skeptical.)
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
This may not be a lasting victory. It appears that, as he previously did, Judge Sweet dismissed the complaint, not the action itself, and granted plaintiffs leave to file a (second) amended complaint. All ONE of them has to do to avoid a third dismissal (and thereby force McDonalds into years of discovery battles), it would appear, is an allegation along the lines of, "Plaintiffs are informed and believe that, during the relevant time period, they viewed the ADVERTISING on numerous occasions."
11
posted on
09/04/2003 12:51:46 PM PDT
by
pogo101
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
Finally, a judge with a bit of common sense.
12
posted on
09/04/2003 12:52:10 PM PDT
by
MEGoody
To: untenured
I recently came back from living overseas, and after I got back I noticed that some food, e.g. yogurt and Coca-Cola, was being offered in smaller containers than when I left. This suggests to me that companies expect that legal trouble is a possibility, so they're offering more choices as a way to partially immunize themselves. It will be interesting to see if McDonald's et al. start offering smaller portion sizes for those who want them.Yup. And some state (I don't recall - probably California) has outlawed carbonated beverages and snack foods on school grounds. Only fruit juice is allowed. Pretty pathetic, eh?
13
posted on
09/04/2003 12:53:29 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: TheBigB
LOL! Of course, what else.
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
High five, Judge!
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
Ah, time for lunch.
To: Gabz; Flurry; SheLion; Max McGarrity; *puff_list
A taste of sanity? Or just a speedbump on the road to ruin?
17
posted on
09/04/2003 12:59:08 PM PDT
by
Just another Joe
(FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: Cobra64
"Only fruit juice is allowed."
I bet those clowns don't realize how much sugar there is in fruit juice.
18
posted on
09/04/2003 1:03:29 PM PDT
by
sticker
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
On the other hand, should't that get big tobacco off the hook for the billions awarded to the states.
19
posted on
09/04/2003 1:06:01 PM PDT
by
Great Dane
(You can smoke just about everywhere in Denmark.)
To: Cobra64
And some state (I don't recall - probably California) has outlawed carbonated beverages and snack foods on school grounds. Only fruit juice is allowed. It should be noted that a 12-oz. can of Coke has 140 Calories, while a 11.5 can of Cran-Grape Juice has 180 Calories. A can of orange juice will run around 160 Calories.
OTOH, a Minute Maid Light has 10 Calories, a Pepsi One has one, and Diet Coke, Diet Pepsi, Fresca, Diet Mountain Dew, Diet Sprite, Diet Sierra Mist, Diet Barq's, and Diet Dr. Pepper all have zero calories.
20
posted on
09/04/2003 1:07:28 PM PDT
by
jae471
To: theDentist
"Sue McDonald's for your obesity?! Fat chance!"
21
posted on
09/04/2003 1:54:27 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
("I'm the party pooper..." -- Arnold in "Kindergarten Cop.")
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
If you eat too much junk, you get fat, so change your eating habits.
Whooooo, dude! What a revelation !!
22
posted on
09/04/2003 1:54:28 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: jae471
It is not the NUMBER of calories that is the issue. It is the nutrition value of the drink. However, I don't see anything wrong with soft drink machines in high schools, because those kids aren't going to drink milk with their lunches no matter what. I can see outlawing the soft drinks for the little kids.
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
You mean there's actually a judge in America that makes the complainant(THIEF)prove something??
To: SendShaqtoIraq
It is the number of Calories that makes people obese.
But how much nutrition is really contained in a 'juice' containing mostly water and sugar.
One problem is the fact that school water fountains don't work 60% of the time. And when choosing between an overpriced bottle of municipal water (Aquafina, Dasani), or a Root Beer, I'm gonna pick (and usually did) the latter.
I do agree that elementary schools shouldn't have soda machines accessible to children, though.
25
posted on
09/04/2003 2:16:29 PM PDT
by
jae471
To: jae471
I do agree that elementary schools shouldn't have soda machines accessible to children, though. They should be given.....GASP!.....milk.
26
posted on
09/04/2003 2:18:11 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: untenured
You're right, and just the fact that this lawsuit had ANY legs is very troubling to me.
27
posted on
09/04/2003 2:34:00 PM PDT
by
menotyu
(Doomsday Jesus we need you now ! Strength, Merciless Determination Forever)
To: TheBigB
>>...and a Diet Coke.
Supersized, of course.
28
posted on
09/04/2003 2:35:40 PM PDT
by
Keith in Iowa
(Tag line produced using 100% post-consumer recycled ethernet packets,)
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
That's great news. And I have quite a few pounds with McDonald's name on it. :D
29
posted on
09/04/2003 2:35:48 PM PDT
by
lawgirl
(Looking how to fill that God-shaped hole - U2- Mofo)
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
Wasn't it Greta Van Sustern's husband who was arguing the case?
30
posted on
09/04/2003 2:38:02 PM PDT
by
Pan_Yans Wife
("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
To: concerned about politics
If you eat too much junk, you get fat, so change your eating habits. Whooooo, dude! What a revelation !!Yup. If I put a loaded .357 in my mouth and pull the trigger, I might not be feeling too well. Of course some doctor would tell my wife to have me take two Bayer aspirins and call him in the morning.
31
posted on
09/04/2003 2:38:28 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
To the plantiffs:
Eat less! Move around more!
32
posted on
09/04/2003 2:39:28 PM PDT
by
chemicalman
(Rid the country of the vast liberal conspiracy)
To: menotyu
Making the right call is encouraging though. I like sweet justice from Justice Sweet.
Gum
33
posted on
09/04/2003 2:44:06 PM PDT
by
ChewedGum
(http://king-of-fools.blogspot.com)
To: SendShaqtoIraq
I can see outlawing the soft drinks for the little kids.Where does it stop? The PARENTS should make these decisions. Not the GOVERNMENT. Who are "the little kids?" To use analogies, "How high is up?" Or, "How fast is fast?"
I drive a 1964 Shelby Cobra over 100 mph on a regular basis. To me, that is not all that fast. My wife never gets her Jag over 80. She thinks that's fast. Think; before all of our rights have been eliminated.
34
posted on
09/04/2003 2:45:38 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
Wow. A common sense decision. 'bout Time!
35
posted on
09/04/2003 2:47:24 PM PDT
by
Maigrey
(Keepin' Tags and lots o' Hugs for Sara Grace and Logan)
To: untenured
Tobacco companies won for many years before the anti-responsibility crowd finally broke through. These suits will probably be filed and refiled on diferent legal grounds until they get a win.Yup. It's the shotgun approach--one pellet is bound to hit the target.
36
posted on
09/04/2003 2:54:18 PM PDT
by
randog
(Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
To: untenured
I recently came back from living overseas, and after I got back I noticed that some food, e.g. yogurt and Coca-Cola, was being offered in smaller containers than when I left. This suggests to me that companies expect that legal trouble is a possibility, so they're offering more choices as a way to partially immunize themselves. It will be interesting to see if McDonald's et al. start offering smaller portion sizes for those who want them.This suggests to me, that companies are trying to maintain their bottom line, while avoiding price increases. Dannon is the yogurt company in question; already, its plucky, smaller competitor Columbo, is emphasizing in its ads that it gives you 33% more yogurt.
37
posted on
09/04/2003 3:21:18 PM PDT
by
mrustow
(no tag)
To: John Jorsett
38
posted on
09/04/2003 3:23:16 PM PDT
by
Lunatic Fringe
(This tag line has been intentionally left blank.)
To: Lunatic Fringe
Mmmmm, piles of gray cow meat ...
:-)
To: MEGoody; All
40
posted on
09/04/2003 3:50:36 PM PDT
by
Sweet_Sunflower29
(Things that make you go Hmmmmm......)
To: concerned about politics
They should be given.....GASP!.....milkI do hope you don't mean cows' milk. That's for baby cows. I think that water should be the drink of choice. Of course, I teach my kids at home where they drink whatever they want (usually cows' milk, lol). Personally, I can't STAND milk. Give me water any day.
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
What could possibly be nutritious about beef, lettuce, tomatos, onions, pickles and a bun made from wheat? Sounds like a horribly bogus recipe of poisons based on the USDA's Food Pyramid hoax.
Come to think of it why wasn't the USDA named in the suit?
42
posted on
09/04/2003 4:49:14 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Regime change in the Courts. - Impeach Activist Judges!)
To: untenured
I normally will read further through a thread before responding to such an early post - but in this instance I can't help myself.
Don't be so sure. Tobacco companies won for many years before the anti-responsibility crowd finally broke through. These suits will probably be filed and refiled on diferent legal grounds until they get a win.
You don't even realize how CORRECT you are. The chief shark, I mean slimebucket, I mean lawyer who filed this lawsuit is the the one that perfected the tobacco litigation, and has repeatedly said he will use all the knowledge garnered from the tobacco lawsuits against the Fast Food industry.
When everyone was cheering the downfall of the tobacco companies, the smokers were the ones warning it would not stop with them and somone would be next - we were laughed at.
The companies are not hurt by these lawsuits - only the consumers are.
When you hear the name John Banzhaf in relation to anything - be afraid - BE VERY AFRAID.
43
posted on
09/04/2003 5:50:40 PM PDT
by
Gabz
(anti-smokers - personification of everything wrong in this country.)
To: Just another Joe
A taste of sanity? Or just a speedbump on the road to ruin? As I said in another post - this lawsuit was spearheaded by Mr. Tobacco lawsuit himself - John Banzhaf.
If you have any belief in the concept of personal responsibility - be VERY AFRAID of the that name.
44
posted on
09/04/2003 5:53:22 PM PDT
by
Gabz
(anti-smokers - personification of everything wrong in this country.)
To: Sweet_Sunflower29
45
posted on
09/04/2003 6:09:09 PM PDT
by
LayoutGuru2
(Call me paranoid but finding '/*' inside this comment makes me suspicious)
To: mrustow
Dannon the FRENCH yogurt company is cheating us in portion size? Oh my! Another reason to boycott Dannon and all other frenchie stuff, beyond the obvious reasons. Pass me the fries, will 'ya please?
To: Cobra64
I drive a 1964 Shelby Cobra over 100 mph on a regular basis. To me, that is not all that fast. My wife never gets her Jag over 80. She thinks that's fast. Think; before all of our rights have been eliminated. Where do you live? In my country they don't even allow you to do that when you've been drinking!
To: untenured
they do offer a smaller portion.....its called one hamburger...one fry...milk or orange juice...gee,i guess fat people don't understand english either since they have trouble understanding the concept of one!!!!!!!
48
posted on
09/04/2003 8:10:26 PM PDT
by
fishbabe
To: Cobra64
Here in the fine old state of Virginia, those speeds would land you in jail. 20 miles or more over the speed limit is reckless driving, punishable by up to 1 year in jail and/or up to a $2500 fine.
There was some judge in Bottetourt County which I-81 runs through who was giving jail time for anyone caught going faster than 80MPH in the 65MPH zone. It got some press a couple of years ago, but apparently he's stopped that and is just giving fines.
To: brianl703
Here in the fine old state of Virginia, those speeds would land you in jail. 20 miles or more over the speed limit is reckless driving, punishable by up to 1 year in jail and/or up to a $2500 fine. Similar to what we have here in NC. The key is keep it safe, and don't get caught.
50
posted on
09/05/2003 9:09:21 AM PDT
by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson