Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REVIEWERS DENOUNCE SHOWTIME'S 9/11 MOVIE AS TOO PRO-BUSH!!
MRC ^ | 10am EDT, Monday September 8, 2003 | BrentBaker

Posted on 09/08/2003 9:30:36 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay

As CyberAlert predicted, newspaper critics have denounced a Showtime movie for being too favorable to President Bush. The September 5 CyberAlert forecast: "On Sunday night, September 7, Showtime will premiere DC 9-11: Time of Crisis, what I understand will be a 'docudrama' with a sympathetic take on President Bush and his top aides in the days after September 11, 2001. So, expect some derisive reviews in newspapers on Saturday and Sunday."

BREAK

Reviews in USA Today, the Washington Post, New York Times and the Boston Globe all ridiculed the script and acting in it, but the favorable portrait of President Bush really upset the reviewers.

"Sheer propaganda," sniffed USA Today's Robert Bianco.
Alessandra Stanley of the New York Times insisted the movie delivered "a sour, partisan undertone."
The Washington Post headline declared: "Showtime's 'DC 9/11' Is a Shameless Bush Booster." Reviewer Tom Shales began the piece below:

"Simultaneously dull and disgraceful, DC 9/11: Time of Crisis...uses the tragic attack on America in 2001 as the basis for a reelection campaign movie on behalf of George W. Bush." Shales complained that the movie "is primitive propaganda that portrays Bush as the noblest hero since Mighty Mouse." The Boston Globe characterized it as "too pro-Bush."

-- Robert Bianco in the September 5 USA Today:
"Written by Lionel Chetwynd, Crisis purports to be an inside report on the Bush administration's response to the Sept. 11 attacks based on interviews with members of that administration. Never mind the obvious opportunities for self-serving twaddle, none of which are missed.
How exactly did anyone at Showtime think this project was even possible?

"Decades later, we're still struggling to understand the White House response to such national flashpoints as Pearl Harbor and the Cuban missile crisis. It's ridiculous to think you can get anywhere near an accurate picture after a mere two years, especially when the administration concerned is up for re-election. What you get is sheer propaganda -- and, in Chetwynd's hands, artless propaganda at that."

For the full USA Today review:

http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/criticscorner/2003-09-04-critics-corner_x.htm

-- Alessandra Stanley in the September 5 New York Times. An excerpt:

....This made-for-television movie on Showtime Sunday night is less a first draft of history than a final rewrite of a Tom Clancy screenplay. George W. Bush, uncannily impersonated by Timothy Bottoms, is its action-adventure commander in chief. "If some tinhorn terrorist wants me, tell him to come get me," the fictionalized President barks at an overprotective security officer keeping him hidden aboard Air Force One on that fateful day. "I'll just be waiting for the bastard."...

"DC 9/11" was written by Lionel Chetwynd, a filmmaker who is one of Hollywood's more outspoken conservatives, and it reflects his unstinting admiration for the President. (In his eyes, the British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, is not particularly eloquent, and Vice President Dick Cheney is a kowtowing yes-man.)

All docudramas round out the facts to fit a story line. Few would dispute the basic accuracy of the film: even his most virulent opponents give the President credit for adapting to the unimaginable attack with speed and resolve.

But a movie about George W. Bush's first serious challenge -- broadcast at the beginning of his re-election campaign and in the middle of a murky, costly war with no marked ending -- inevitably lends it a sour, partisan undertone....

"DC 9/11" traces Mr. Bush's transition from new, untested president to committed wartime leader, but along the way it rarely misses a chance to suggest that the Clinton administration's weakness was to blame for the disaster.

"I want to inflict pain," Mr. Bush tells Prime Minister Blair over the telephone. "Bring enough damage so they understand there is a new team here, a fundamental change in our policy."

The script does not air-brush Mr. Bush's first, awkward stumbles, and it faithfully recreates his stiff televised statement from Barksdale Air Force Base. The movie also puts him back on his feet very quickly. On Air Force One, he is totally in control.
"Hike military alert status to Delta," he instructs Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld (John Cunningham). "That's the military, the C.I.A., foreign, domestic, everything," he explains to Mr. Rumsfeld, who was also Secretary of Defense under President Gerald R. Ford. "And if you haven't gone to Defcon 3, you oughtta." He then gets on the line with Mr. Cheney (Lawrence Pressman): "Vice? We are at war."...

END of Excerpt

For the New York Times review in full: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/05/arts/television/05STAN.html

-- "Showtime's 'DC 9/11' Is a Shameless Bush Booster," read the headline over the September 6 Washington Post review by Tom Shales. An excerpt:

Simultaneously dull and disgraceful, "DC 9/11: Time of Crisis," a new Showtime movie, uses the tragic attack on America in 2001 as the basis for a reelection campaign movie on behalf of George W. Bush.

The film is an insult to those who perished in the attacks and, really, an insult to America generally, but it's so insanely boring that people aren't likely to become very outraged over it. Written by conservative Republican Lionel Chetwynd, who admits to a bias in Bush's favor, the film -- premiering on Showtime tomorrow night at 8 -- is primitive propaganda that portrays Bush as the noblest hero since Mighty Mouse.

Nothing in historical record suggests Bush acted particularly heroically Sept. 11, 2001, but Chetwynd's script has him all but saddling up a horse and riding over to Afghanistan to fight the Taliban man-to-man. When Bush announces he will give a speech to the nation from the White House and aides try to talk him into seeking a safer location, Bush bellows, "If some tinhorn terrorist wants me, tell him to come on over and get me. I'll be home!"

Bush repeatedly demands he be taken to the White House as Air Force One flies aimlessly about on that horrible September day: "I've got to get back to Washington because I'm not going to let those people keep me from getting home," he barks. And earlier: "Get me home!...The American people want to know where their damn president is." And still earlier: "People can't have an AWOL President!"

All this may be pure fantasy that occurred only in Chetwynd's head, or wishful thinking by members of the Bush administration, who cooperated with Chetwynd in his research....

END of Excerpt

For the Shales review in its entirety: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33336-2003Sep5.html

-- "'DC 9/11' is too pro-Bush, and too late," declared the Boston Globe headline over a September 6 review by Mark Jurkowitz. An Excerpt:

If "DC 9/11: Time of Crisis" could ever be cut down to a bite-size portion, it would make the best presidential reelection ad ever conceived, one that would force every Democratic challenger to abandon the chase for the White House.

Most Americans, of all political stripes, would agree that in the frantic days after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, George Bush's steely leadership and deft tone helped stabilize a nation knocked out of its equilibrium and stripped of its comfortable preconceptions. This Showtime "docudrama" promises to give viewers a behind-the-scenes look at the administration's machinations and deliberations in the days right after 9/11. Instead, it proves a slick piece of propaganda that deifies the president and portrays the wheels of government as turning with well-oiled precision in the face of the gravest crisis to confront the country in a generation.

Whether visiting the injured, ordering an ultimatum to the Taliban, perusing Psalm 23, or affirming American values in a misty-eyed conversation with National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, Bush (Timothy Bottoms) is unbowed, unflappable, and unwavering. He is, to put it in Hollywood terms, part John Wayne and part Gary Cooper, with a little Jimmy Stewart tossed in for good measure....

END of Excerpt

For the Globe review in full:

"A liberal can go out and make...'The West Wing,' which is not even thinly disguised as a liberal view of politics, and do hours of propaganda every week, and no one questions it," he says.

"It's not something that's done behind closed doors. It's openly accepted by everyone, including me," says Mr. Chetwynd, whose previous credits include "The Hanoi Hilton" (1987), about American prisoners of war during the Vietnam War, as well as numerous TV films and news specials.

Mr. Chetwynd says he faced withering questioning, some insulting, at the recent Television Critics Association meeting where he promoted the film.

"They demanded to know, did I contribute money to George Bush, how much did I contribute," he says. He also got questions about his personal life and the people with whom he associates.

"Because I'm a Republican, I am suspect and should not be trusted," he says.

He says if Harry Thomason, a longtime TV producer and famous pal of former President Bill Clinton's, had made a film depicting that presidency, he wouldn't face such an assault....

END of Excerpt

For the story in full: http://www.washingtontimes.com/arts/20030905-082353-1365r.htm

I watched the movie, I mean docudrama, last night and I didn't think it was as bad as the reviews made out, though it did come across more like a C-SPAN hidden camera effort than a full-fledged movie. I also noticed that the producers made deals with CNN and FNC for news video, so while most of the newscasts shown were made into generic feeds, Brit Hume got two clips and Wolf Blitzer got one.

Showtime's additional airings of the movie, times supposedly EDT and PDT: - Showtime Too East 09/08/03 9:30 PM
- Showtime Showcase East 09/10/03 5:30 PM
- Showtime Showcase East 09/10/03 5:05 AM
- Showtime East 09/11/03 9:00 PM

For Showtime's page on the "docudrama," go to: http://www.sho.com/movies/movies_product.cfm?titleid=119354

For the Friday CyberAlert item on it: http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2003/cyb20030905.asp#5


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; dc911; libsnverfailus; showtime; whatdidyouexpect
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last
Juxtapose DC 9-11 into the liberal reviews on Seabiscuit:

Seabiscuit [DC 9-11] is a proudly cornball sentimental epic—a reverential paean to a vanished America that's steeped in inspirational uplift and played for world-historical pathos. - The Village Voice

or

To make Seabiscuit [DC 9-11] into a parable about a nation’s recovery and survival in hard times only deceives people about American society and history. In the end, such an effort is meant, rather flimsily, to “keep hope alive,” at a time when serious doubts about the viability of the present set-up are forming in many minds.- World Socialist Web Site

Just another Brick in the Wall.

1 posted on 09/08/2003 9:30:37 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Why shouldn't it be pro-Bush? He was a hero of 911.
2 posted on 09/08/2003 9:32:09 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
The lefties always swim in a bottomless cistern of rancor for Americans and hatred for America.
3 posted on 09/08/2003 9:33:31 AM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
At least one of these reviewers had the presence of mind to be named Mark Jurkowitz.
4 posted on 09/08/2003 9:33:50 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
From what I understand it sure wasn't Praimary Colors, or the West Wing.
5 posted on 09/08/2003 9:34:33 AM PDT by dts32041 ("Moderate Arab" he's the one who detonates his bomb via remote control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Imagine the fawning reviews if Algore or the Toons were in the White House on that dreadful day. Of course, we would probably have surrendered by now, but imagine the reviews! /sarcasm
6 posted on 09/08/2003 9:36:58 AM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) (Dammit Jim, I'm a doctor, not a Tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
The casting was great and the story was fine.  The left is just pi--ed as they can be that Clinton didn't turn out to be a guy who could bite his lip and look presidential during this terrible period in our history.

I think I summed this up quite well a few months back.  Here's that graphic

Envy and Pride...

Screw the left.  What do they know.

7 posted on 09/08/2003 9:41:00 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)
Our media "elite":


8 posted on 09/08/2003 9:43:26 AM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)
Let's see we've had how many fawning movies about "the greatest President ever" JFK, who served 1/2 of a term and managed several major blunders. It seems we can't get enough books, movies, docudramas and other stories lamenting the days of Camelot but one movie depicting the events of 9/11 and it's apoplexy on the left!
9 posted on 09/08/2003 9:44:31 AM PDT by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Funny thing is, the actor who portrays Bush in the movie is none other than Timothy Bottoms, who portrayed Bush in a comedic vein in "That's My Bush."
10 posted on 09/08/2003 9:44:57 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
It's ridiculous to think you can get anywhere near an accurate picture after a mere two years,

Gee, they must have really had fits when Bob Woodward put out a book about it less than a year.

Oh wait, what am I thinking. Woodward's a liberal icon. Never mind.

11 posted on 09/08/2003 9:45:27 AM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marlon
What you are saying is true, but the difference is that those movies were made after Kennedy's presidency, not during. I am always uneasy about portraying a President in a movie while he is still in office, regardless of political affiliation.
12 posted on 09/08/2003 9:47:45 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
I thought Bob Woodward was a Republican. It was Bernstein that was the flaming liberal.
13 posted on 09/08/2003 9:49:02 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
PT 109 was released in the early portion of JFK's administration, I believe.

Timothy Bottoms was also in the original Paper Chase and Johnny Got His Gun.

14 posted on 09/08/2003 9:50:25 AM PDT by Clemenza (East side, West side, all around the town. Tripping the light fantastic on the sidewalks of New York)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Television Critics Association (TCA) meeting where he promoted the film.

"They demanded to know, did I contribute money to George Bush, how much did I contribute," he says. He also got questions about his personal life and the people with whom he associates.

The TCA Who's Who are:
TCA PRESIDENT: Diane Werts, Newsday,TCA VICE-PRESIDENT: Kay McFadden, Seattle Times,TCA SECRETARY: Rob Owen, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette,TCA TREASURER: Kathy Tracy, The Herald/Canada,John Kiesewetter, Cincinnati Enquirer,Eric Deggans, St. Petersburg Times,Valerie Milano, Video Age International.

15 posted on 09/08/2003 9:51:18 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I thought Bob Woodward was a Republican.

Woodward grew up in Wheaton, Illinois in the 1940s/50s, when you were more likely to meet a martian then a Democrat in that town. He may have had a change of heart in adulthood, however.

16 posted on 09/08/2003 9:51:41 AM PDT by Clemenza (East side, West side, all around the town. Tripping the light fantastic on the sidewalks of New York)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
I think they meant it wasnt enough "anti Bush" for their tastes
17 posted on 09/08/2003 9:54:07 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Exactly. I watched it last night and found it to be incredibly factual.
18 posted on 09/08/2003 9:56:19 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I thought Bob Woodward was a Republican. It was Bernstein that was the flaming liberal.

I wasn't aware of that. However even if he is a Pub he is still a liberal icon for having gotten Nixon, so he gets a pass.

19 posted on 09/08/2003 10:00:28 AM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Never heard these same naysayers ridiculing West Wing or Wag the Dog or that other movie starring Travolta that was pro-Clintoon. Dismiss the lot of them for their RAT biasness.
20 posted on 09/08/2003 10:02:35 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Wag the Dog, the President is caught in a scandal with an underage girl. Or President Gene Hackman in Absolute Power, who has rough sex with the wife of a major contributor.Harrison Ford in Air Force One;American President, Michael Douglas;Frank Capra's 1948 State of the Union, Spencer Tracy..

f_t_d
21 posted on 09/08/2003 10:02:36 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
It was great.
22 posted on 09/08/2003 10:02:45 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (Paleocons - defined as the French generals of the political world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
Bob Woodward, "Clinton's offences were nothing compared to Nixon's." Democrat? Republican? How about moron.
23 posted on 09/08/2003 10:06:03 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Few would dispute the basic accuracy of the film: even his most virulent opponents give the President credit for adapting to the unimaginable attack with speed and resolve.Alessandra Stanley in the September 5 New York Times

But(he continues) a movie about George W. Bush's first serious challenge -- broadcast at the beginning of his re-election campaign and in the middle of a murky, costly war with no marked ending -- inevitably lends it a sour, partisan undertone....

Am changing my name to Truth_Is_Sour.

24 posted on 09/08/2003 10:11:09 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
These must be the same people who could not find anything wrong with bent willie, the pervert, getting a BJ in the peoples house.
25 posted on 09/08/2003 10:11:37 AM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
I really wanted to see it. I don't pay for Showtime, so I guess I don't get to. The other one I'm looking forward to is "The Passion", which I would see just because I want to hear Aramaic spoken. I had nightmares about the little three second clip I saw.
26 posted on 09/08/2003 10:11:48 AM PDT by johnb838 (Deconstruct the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
The greatest lines of all were the ones related to the fact that everything had changed, and America wouldn't take ineffective, halfhearted measures.

I found myself wondering if that wasn't kind of an apology piece by Bottoms.

27 posted on 09/08/2003 10:14:33 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (Paleocons - defined as the French generals of the political world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
They'll release it on video in the next 6 months to a year.
28 posted on 09/08/2003 10:15:09 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (Paleocons - defined as the French generals of the political world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: marlon
Don't forget John Glenn's campaign movie "The Right Stuff"- if you read the book then see the movie you can see the intent of the movie clearly.
29 posted on 09/08/2003 10:15:43 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
can't wait to see it now...funny, this reminds me of what it must be like to throw holy water on vampires...
30 posted on 09/08/2003 10:28:18 AM PDT by jonalvy44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
One look of Dubya in that Flight Suit is worth 1000 movies!
31 posted on 09/08/2003 10:35:29 AM PDT by Sangria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
These same nutjobs will praise Michael Moore's 9/11 "documentary."
32 posted on 09/08/2003 10:38:07 AM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
"I am always uneasy about portraying a President in a movie while he is still in office, regardless of political affiliation."

Gee the folks at Saturday Night Live will be crushed.

33 posted on 09/08/2003 10:40:12 AM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Yes, it was!

I purchased Showtime specifically for this. Even if I watch nothing else and cancel after 6 months, it was worth it.

Actually, I thought the portrayal of W's speeches was way too stiff and lacked veracity. While not an orator, when he warms to his subject, President Bush projects his integrity every time, IMO.

Anyone seen any overnight viewer stats?
34 posted on 09/08/2003 10:43:42 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
As did, I am sure, many Americans who sent "IRAQ: I SUPPORT YOU, MR. PRESIDENT" letters to W at the suggestion of some here on FreeRepublic, I recently received a signed (wet signature) "Thank You" letter from President Bush.

He sent it from the Bush ranch in Crawford, Texas while on his August vacation. It will be framed and proudly hung on my office wall. This is a great and caring man, and one whom I thank God was president when 9/11 happened.

;-/

35 posted on 09/08/2003 10:45:00 AM PDT by Gargantua (Embrace clarity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
I haven't seen any stats.

Showtime has a couple of decent things going for it - boxing and "Dead Like Me" (a pretty raw yet funny look at the lives of grim reapers). Also, it shows "Heartbreakers" a lot, which is a great combination of a really funny plot, a chick flick, and major eye candy if you like Sigourney Weaver and Jennifer Love Hewitt.

36 posted on 09/08/2003 10:47:11 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (Paleocons - defined as the French generals of the political world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
This is a good example of the leftist mentality at work. The truth about 9-11 must not be told, because the left are largely to blame for 9-11 in the first place!
37 posted on 09/08/2003 10:49:43 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
It's ridiculous to think you can get anywhere near an accurate picture after a mere two years,...

That's why there has never ever been a movie made about JFK...

38 posted on 09/08/2003 11:01:16 AM PDT by gridlock (Remember: Shiny Side Out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Not only was he a hero - Bob Woodward's 8-part series in the Washington Post was pretty much what the movie was about - I don't recall all the "propaganda" stuff then ..?? And .. the interesting thing about Bob's story - it completely changed his mind about Bush! Amazing!!
39 posted on 09/08/2003 11:03:42 AM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Mural of 9/11 found in Iraq


40 posted on 09/08/2003 12:05:05 PM PDT by Tamzee ("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
When Bush announces he will give a speech to the nation from the White House and aides try to talk him into seeking a safer location, Bush bellows, "If some tinhorn terrorist wants me, tell him to come on over and get me. I'll be home!" Bush repeatedly demands he be taken to the White House as Air Force One flies aimlessly about on that horrible September day: "I've got to get back to Washington because I'm not going to let those people keep me from getting home," he barks. And earlier: "Get me home!...The American people want to know where their damn president is." And still earlier: "People can't have an AWOL President!"

Umm, I thought this was part of the historical record. Sounds like the scriptwriter was trying to be...accurate? Well I guess if you're a lib editorial writer, that would present a problem.

41 posted on 09/08/2003 12:26:50 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
And .. the interesting thing about Bob's story - it completely changed his mind about Bush! Amazing!!

As annoyed as I was with Woodward holding onto Watergate with all his might and refusing to say clinton deserved impeachment, he has gained great respect for President Bush, and so gained some of my respect.

Back during the trumped up "yellowcake/uranium" controversy, Bob Woodward was on Larry King early on and said the whole thing was absolute nonsense and said this administration is honest, plus the take the story was being given showed a lack of understanding on how intelligence works.

Although most media yammered on for another week or two, recalling that Woodward interview helped keep me calm.

42 posted on 09/08/2003 12:28:21 PM PDT by cyncooper (God Bless the U.S.A.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik
You are correct. That is the historical record.
43 posted on 09/08/2003 12:29:50 PM PDT by cyncooper (God Bless the U.S.A.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Except that it could be reassuring to the people of the United States of America to know that we have a bull in office. It makes me feel safer.
44 posted on 09/08/2003 12:34:17 PM PDT by MontanaBeth (Born Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
What you are saying is true, but the difference is that those movies were made after Kennedy's presidency, not during. I am always uneasy about portraying a President in a movie while he is still in office, regardless of political affiliation.

I agree, but the issue here is the hypcrisy of reviewers who say nothing about shows such as West Wing and its ilk, which, as you know, aired during the Clinton presidency, spouting similar positions on issues....
45 posted on 09/08/2003 12:39:48 PM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
I watched it and they're right, it was pro-Bush! I love that it riles all these commies scribes conrolling the American press.
46 posted on 09/08/2003 12:43:44 PM PDT by hope (So many Hollywood has beens trying to make a comeback in Gay Paris!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
or that other movie starring Travolta that was pro-Clintoon.

If Primary Colors was pro-Clinton, that just shows how depraved the liberals have become; Travolta's character was a vile human being (same for Emma Thompson playing pseudo-Hillary!).

47 posted on 09/08/2003 12:49:39 PM PDT by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MontanaBeth
Except that it could be reassuring to the people of the United States of America to know that we have a bull in office.

Amen to that, especially after eight years of that self-serving, egotistical, amoral fop.

48 posted on 09/08/2003 12:50:44 PM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I too saw Woodward on Larry King - the thing I laughed the most about was when Larry ask Bob about Bush's statement, "Bring 'em on". Bob just threw back his head and laughed and said - "that's just Bush". Larry tried to make a big deal out of it and Bob thought the statement was funny. The expression on Larry's face was priceless!!

I agree about the respect thing over Watergate and Clinton.
49 posted on 09/08/2003 12:52:46 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
You see time again, democrats can't stand the truth! Bush is a hero.
50 posted on 09/08/2003 2:00:07 PM PDT by deedgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson