Skip to comments.
Bush Is Evil
National Review ^
| September 9, 2003
| William F. Buckley Jr.
Posted on 09/09/2003 3:15:06 PM PDT by quidnunc
Why they hate him.
In a private forum the question arose, Why do they hate Bush so? And
what will they do with that hatred? How far can they carry it? How will it affect the next presidential election?
The participants agreed that it is a singular hatred, greater by far than what was felt by dissenters against Ronald Reagan in 1984, and rivaling what was felt for Nixon in 1973-4. It supplies a useful context here to recall that hatred of Nixon was very much alive in 1972, but he carried 49 states in his reelection bid. The decapitation of Nixon was in due course effected, but required his cooperation. Bush, by contrast, is not ever going to engage in suicidal activity of an extra-political character. Does this mean that the animosity toward him will wash away in the flood tide of a reelection victory? An examination of this point needs of course to acknowledge that you don't have to do a Watergate to end your career. George H. W. Bush ended his without any brush with felony.
The inquiry continues: Why the feelings toward Bush? The answer, as agreed upon in this improvised study, was: 1) He is not legitimately president of the United States. The other guy got more votes. Bush slipped in because of capricious conduct by the courts. 2) Bush is a Christer. He takes every opportunity to inform the American people that he is in touch with the Lord and therefore that, by deduction, what he does is the Lord's work. 3) He gravely miscalculated the onus of what he set out to do in Iraq. The consequences of that miscalculation are deaths unending, and more money spent than King Solomon dreamed of. 4) The economy lacks the kind of resiliency it might have shown if more resourcefully tended. 5) His truckling to the rich in his tax cuts shows a callous disregard of civil adjudications between America's poor and America's rich. And finally, 6) He is a liar. He specifically informed the public that Iraq had in hand instantly deployable weapons of mass destruction. These, it proved, did not exist.
The question then was: How will the opposition communicate this animosity? When Democratic Candidate X faces President Bush in the televised debate, how will he express, or capitalize on, the odium? One participant recalled the deep, histrionic sighs of Al Gore when confronting Bush in debate. But of course the consensus was that Gore was hurt, not helped, by the body language.
Will the average voter wish to hear about the evil of Bush? What is the good of hating Bush if you can't interest your neighbor, and his neighbor, in hating Bush? That, after all, is the point of this exercise-to send Bush back to his ranch, permanently.
-snip-
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush43; bushhaters; dean; electionpresident; rats; williamfbuckleyjr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-61 next last
1
posted on
09/09/2003 3:15:07 PM PDT
by
quidnunc
To: quidnunc
In a private forum the question arose, Why do they hate Bush so? And . . . what will they do with that hatred? How far can they carry it? How will it affect the next presidential election?
The participants agreed that it is a singular hatred, greater by far than what was felt by dissenters against Ronald Reagan in 1984, and rivaling what was felt for Nixon in 1973-4. It supplies a useful context here to recall that hatred of Nixon was very much alive in 1972, but he carried 49 states in his reelection bid. The decapitation of Nixon was in due course effected, but required his cooperation. Bush, by contrast, is not ever going to engage in suicidal activity of an extra-political character. Does this mean that the animosity toward him will wash away in the flood tide of a reelection victory? An examination of this point needs of course to acknowledge that you don't have to do a Watergate to end your career. George H. W. Bush ended his without any brush with felony.
The inquiry continues: Why the feelings toward Bush? The answer, as agreed upon in this improvised study, was: 1) He is not legitimately president of the United States. The other guy got more votes. Bush slipped in because of capricious conduct by the courts. 2) Bush is a Christer. He takes every opportunity to inform the American people that he is in touch with the Lord and therefore that, by deduction, what he does is the Lord's work. 3) He gravely miscalculated the onus of what he set out to do in Iraq. The consequences of that miscalculation are deaths unending, and more money spent than King Solomon dreamed of. 4) The economy lacks the kind of resiliency it might have shown if more resourcefully tended. 5) His truckling to the rich in his tax cuts shows a callous disregard of civil adjudications between America's poor and America's rich. And finally, 6) He is a liar. He specifically informed the public that Iraq had in hand instantly deployable weapons of mass destruction. These, it proved, did not exist.
The question then was: How will the opposition communicate this animosity? When Democratic Candidate X faces President Bush in the televised debate, how will he express, or capitalize on, the odium? One participant recalled the deep, histrionic sighs of Al Gore when confronting Bush in debate. But of course the consensus was that Gore was hurt, not helped, by the body language.
Will the average voter wish to hear about the evil of Bush? What is the good of hating Bush if you can't interest your neighbor, and his neighbor, in hating Bush? That, after all, is the point of this exercise-to send Bush back to his ranch, permanently.
Probably the first person who will need to explore these questions is Howard Dean. Dean is campaigning against Bush using language that would be appropriate in campaigning against a public enemy. One assumes the sincerity of Dean's passion, which is doing yeoman work for him with Internet ideologues and with Manichaean Democrats drawn to the proposition that the only way to understand Bush is to know that he is evil.
Is it predictable that after Dean sews up the nomination, winning in Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina, he will confront a body of previously inert Democrats who will be reluctant to endorse an anti-Bush campaign based on the incumbent's venality?
If that happened, how quickly would it happen? The nomination might well be sewn up by early March of 2004. How soon after that would Candidate Dean discover that the drumbeat which has been propelling him isn't resonating over hill and vale into the body of voters needed to proceed with the election of a new president, which is something different from the excommunication of a sinner?
That test could come before Dean is anointed. It is entirely possible that the people who go to the polls in Iowa and New Hampshire will be wondering whether they are being coopted by the moral absolutes of Candidate Dean, who is asking them to dispatch him to kill the dragon in the White House.
George Bush could ease that problem for Dean by simply becoming evil. But that is not something Howard Dean can safely count upon.
2
posted on
09/09/2003 3:18:22 PM PDT
by
finnman69
(!)
To: quidnunc; Peach; Mo1; PhiKapMom; Howlin; Miss Marple
I just heard on Fox News that the RAT Senators plan on denying the President $21 Billion of the 87 Billion he has asked for....I am so freaking pissed.
3
posted on
09/09/2003 3:20:04 PM PDT
by
Dog
To: quidnunc
Not up to Buckley's best unfortunately. I didn't even learn any new words. All snack and no main course.
To: Dog
I just heard on Fox News that the RAT Senators plan on denying the President $21 Billion of the 87 Billion he has asked for....I am so freaking pissed.You are kidding me!!! How dare they. Do they forget they are in the minority and unless a Republican jumps ship, they don't get to dictate that.
5
posted on
09/09/2003 3:23:01 PM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: quidnunc
... The other guy got more votes. I suppose if you don't count military votes and dangle a few chads it gets a little easier to fantasize about the other guy winning.
The right man got the job. President George W Bush AKA Commander in Chief.
6
posted on
09/09/2003 3:23:36 PM PDT
by
swheats
To: Peach
No I'm not kidding you....they will deny the 21 Billion that is meant to go the Afghanistan.
7
posted on
09/09/2003 3:28:58 PM PDT
by
Dog
To: swheats
If half the people in Texas that vote republican thought that the NUMBER of votes mattered instead of electoral votes, you can bet GWB would have had another 1,000,000.
8
posted on
09/09/2003 3:28:58 PM PDT
by
q_an_a
To: Dog
Yea, unbelieveable isn't it?
Byrd: Congress isn't an ATM
Kennedy: Congress doesn't write blank checks
Biden: The President should ask the top 1% of earners to give back their $90,000 tax cut to pay for it, so it isn't all on the backs of poor people...
To: quidnunc
This article misses the biggest reasons why the far left is anti-George W. and anti-Christian -- abortion and sexual liberation. They don't like George W. Bush because they are afraid that he'll get to appoint Supreme Court justices. It used to be popular to claim that the Religious Right were single issue voters on abortion. The truth is that a lot of the "religious" Left are also single issue voters on abortion.
To: Peach
Chuck Hagel, John McCain
To: Vladivostok; Peach
Thanks for posting that..
Peach see post 9..
12
posted on
09/09/2003 3:32:25 PM PDT
by
Dog
To: Wait4Truth; Peach
Chaffee.....Snow.......Collins
13
posted on
09/09/2003 3:33:26 PM PDT
by
Dog
To: quidnunc
Why they hate him ? Simple, civilized discourse is breaking down between the two parties and the democrats are pushing for a final showdown of sorts.
Civil war is no longer an implausible scenario.
14
posted on
09/09/2003 3:34:51 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Islam : totalitarian political ideology / meme cloaked under the cover of religion)
To: q_an_a
You notice the left never want to mention electoral votes. Must be talking to those first time book buyers of Hillary's.
Speaking of the old gal. "Losing bin Laden" comes out and she goes quietly off to wait it out.
15
posted on
09/09/2003 3:34:51 PM PDT
by
swheats
To: Dog
I listened to part of them today on C-Span. Made me sick.
They get me nuts when they start whining about $$ for the military. They never mind spending $$ on domestic programs, but let someone spend extra on the military and they go ballistic.
The Rats keep saying the president hasn't asked the American people to sacrifice. How about asking Democrats to sacrifice - slow down the growth of some programs, postpone prescription drug coverage by 6 mos.
The prescription drug pricetag is $400 billion! But they'll complain about what we spend in Iraq to secure the region that is vital to our national interests.
16
posted on
09/09/2003 3:39:11 PM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Wait4Truth
Although McCain was hostile to WOlfowitz today (from what I saw on C-Span), I don't think he'd withhold $$ that is also intended to go to the troops - better equipment and trucks, etc., according to some article I read.
17
posted on
09/09/2003 3:40:17 PM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: quidnunc
I was overseas during Reagan. They hated him and called him a warmonger and a worse man than Hitler. Hundreds of thousands demonstrated in Europe against him....
He was ridiculed for saying evil empire, and Mr. Gorbechev tear down this wall....and then the wall came down and they "forgot" how they hated him and insisted that it had nothing to do with his actions...
18
posted on
09/09/2003 3:41:29 PM PDT
by
LadyDoc
To: Dog
No I'm not kidding you....they will deny the 21 Billion that is meant to go the Afghanistan. Afghanistan????
What are they friggin Nuts ... What do they really want .... the taliban to set up shop there again??
19
posted on
09/09/2003 3:45:09 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
To: Peach
The Rats keep saying the president hasn't asked the American people to sacrifice. How about the Rats stop funding their pet projects .. or how about they stop voting THEMSELVES a pay raise
20
posted on
09/09/2003 3:47:41 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
To: Leroy S. Mort
True. It is, however, an interesting poser - will his "I hate Bush" message carry him through to Boston. If not, there's always Hillary....with her "I hate Bush" message. Second verse, same as the first....
To: Vladivostok
Congress isn't an ATM This comes from The King of Pork?
22
posted on
09/09/2003 3:48:01 PM PDT
by
kcordell
To: quidnunc
Why do they hate him? Because he's everything they aren't and everything they can never be. And mainly that's because he's an American (in the traditional God fearing red, white and blue sense of the word).
23
posted on
09/09/2003 3:49:09 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
To: Peach
Was this the same meeting where Levin is asking about rosey scenarios before going to war? Something about Iraq's oil producing enough to sustain Iraq once it was online.
I was curious if the before war scenarios included timelines of expectations.
It's only been 5 months.
24
posted on
09/09/2003 3:49:31 PM PDT
by
swheats
To: LadyDoc
He was ridiculed for saying evil empire, and Mr. Gorbechev tear down this wall....and then the wall came down and they "forgot" how they hated him and insisted that it had nothing to do with his actions...
They liked the freedom, they didn't like the price. Freedom always comes with a price - HEROES BLOOD! Nobody wants a hero over there. America loves a hero. America prizes freedom more then it's own blood - as it should.
25
posted on
09/09/2003 3:52:16 PM PDT
by
Only1choice____Freedom
(If everything you experienced, believed, lived was a lie, would you want to know the truth?)
To: swheats
I'm not sure regarding Levin. I only heard part of McCain and a few minutes of Kennedy and had to turn it off.
26
posted on
09/09/2003 3:59:37 PM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Mo1
Yeah - that pay raise has me ticked to a fairthewell.
27
posted on
09/09/2003 4:00:09 PM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: quidnunc
"The other guy got more votes?" What a bunch of brain dead weiners. What they are really taking aim at is the Electoral College that protects the rest of the USofA from the tryanny of highly populated states.
Hillary vowed to put an end to the Electoral College there by ending the protection of less populace states from the nests of liberal cockroaches in NY and Cali.
To: quidnunc
Let's give them more reason to hate Bush. Let's reelect him in 2004, with a philabuster squashing majority in both houses and really get to work on the desocialization of America.
29
posted on
09/09/2003 4:01:19 PM PDT
by
F.J. Mitchell
(Picture all nine Dimmercrat Clowndidates exiting a Yugo clown car at each of their gigs..cmpg. stops)
To: Vladivostok
Byrd: Congress isn't an ATM Funny, Byrd seems to think it's an ATM when it comes to his pork barrel projects.
Hypocrite.
30
posted on
09/09/2003 4:09:51 PM PDT
by
Jorge
To: Dog
Yep for all their moaning and groaning about the safety of the troops they wish to deny it for purely political reasons. They are such cowards and liars they make me sick.
31
posted on
09/09/2003 4:16:42 PM PDT
by
vpintheak
(Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
To: nutmeg
read later bump
32
posted on
09/09/2003 4:18:06 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
(Is the DemocRATic party extinct yet?)
To: Jorge
Byrd is a KKK Hypocrite....Grand Kleagle Byrd...Head Recruiter for the KKK years ago.....hypocricy is one of his least faults.
To: Dog
I just heard on Fox News that the RAT Senators plan on denying the President $21 Billion of the 87 Billion he has asked for.... That's probably why he asked for 87 B -- his real need is probably more like 45 B -- knowing that the Rats will trim it, he still comes out ahead. He's a smart man.
To: Dog
Chaffee.....Snow.......Collins It is idiotic to forget that they give us the majority. They have stuck with us on most major votes and to pretend that they are not Republican enough when no one more conservative could be elected to their states is just foolishness.
35
posted on
09/09/2003 4:42:26 PM PDT
by
Theyknow
To: MrsEmmaPeel
if Bush only needs say 60B, asks for 80, and gets his 60, he looks like a compromiser and the left looks anti-defense, anti-American...
36
posted on
09/09/2003 4:46:02 PM PDT
by
votelife
(Free Bill Pryor)
To: votelife
if Bush only needs say 60B, asks for 80, and gets his 60, he looks like a compromiser and the left looks anti-defense, anti-American... Absolutely. There is no way Bush can lose on this. (Unless of course, he's asking only for what he needs -- which I doubt.)
To: quidnunc
The primary reason the leftists hate Bush is that he pried their sticky little fingers from the levers of power. The Democrats think they are Entitled to run the country and fill their pockets with loot. They are really, really angry that he has taken away their hog trough.
38
posted on
09/09/2003 4:54:56 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: finnman69
Remember how the libs crawled back under their rocks right after 9/11? If we get whacked again, like AQ is promising, liberals will become more scarce than dodo birds.
39
posted on
09/09/2003 4:56:42 PM PDT
by
Spok
To: MrsEmmaPeel
a good article said Bush was going to wring the Dems around the neck with this vote...I think there's truth to that. The Dems love to attack Bush etc, but when there forced to take a vote to side with America or side against America, they go into conniption fits!
40
posted on
09/09/2003 5:00:10 PM PDT
by
votelife
(Free Bill Pryor)
To: quidnunc
bump
41
posted on
09/09/2003 5:01:26 PM PDT
by
BigWaveBetty
(Lefties = Failuremongers)
To: anniegetyourgun
If not, there's always Hillary....with her "I hate Bush" message. Second verse, same as the first....There it is. When it all finally boils down to "I hate Bush", after every possible scenario has been outted by the press encouraging that hate, spun by the current candidates, Hitlery's hat will come flying into the ring. She can't debate, she can't field off-the-cuff questions so she's allowing her dingbat minnions to work through all the crappola in preparation for her white horse act at the eleventh hour.
42
posted on
09/09/2003 5:03:21 PM PDT
by
JoeSixPack1
(POW/MIA - Bring 'em home, or send us back! Semper Fi (Tag Line copying encouraged))
To: Question_Assumptions
Exactly.
43
posted on
09/09/2003 5:23:18 PM PDT
by
bluelowrider57
(More of da thugz crawlin)
To: quidnunc
The demo's have tought me never to vote for a gang of haters.They are the evil party IMHO.
44
posted on
09/09/2003 6:13:26 PM PDT
by
solo gringo
(Always Ranting Always Rite)
To: Theyknow
I agree about Collins and Snowe...not Chaffee. Both he and his father were/are stupid, flakey and Democrat-friendly.
The truth is, liberal states elect liberal Republicans. Easily overcome in the House...deadly in the Senate. But Byrd can't live forever.
45
posted on
09/09/2003 6:14:18 PM PDT
by
Deb
(My Tag Skies to Gotham & Con-Fabs With Net Prexies)
To: Deb
Hey Deb!
Mind thrashing me around a little bit for old times sake? I deserve it baby .....
To: Deb
Okay..I'll start..your an idiot and women shouldn't even be able to post on these sites.
To: finnman69
bump
To: Jim Robinson
They hate him because he understands the sacrifce that comes with freedom. Liberals hate nothing more than having to put something, or somone else's needs before their own. Liberals hate the idea that some people love this country more than they can even love themselves.
49
posted on
09/09/2003 6:27:17 PM PDT
by
Diva Betsy Ross
((were it not for the brave, there would be no land of the free -))
To: swheats
And perpetrate massive vote fraud nationwide. 103% turnout - 100% of the votes going to Gore ( both statistically impossible) - votes for cigarettes - the many, many states that don't require or look at photo ID which should be a minimum. And which party benefitted from all of these shenanigans, I ask rhetorically.
50
posted on
09/09/2003 6:28:35 PM PDT
by
Let's Roll
(And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson