Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New North Korean Missile Could Hit Anywhere in the US
Bloomberg Business Wire and the Associated Press ^ | Sept. 12, 2003 GMT | wire staff

Posted on 09/12/2003 5:10:00 AM PDT by meg70

Edited on 07/19/2004 2:11:57 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

North Korea has been using Russian technology to develop a ballistic missile that could theoretically strike anywhere in the US, the Associated Press reported, citing a Bush Admistration official.

The potential range of the missile is 9,400 miles, AP said, citing the unidentifed offical. The distance between Pyonyang the North Korean capital and San Francisco is about 5,500 miles, the AP reported.


(Excerpt) Read more at quote.bloomberg.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: icbm; northkorea; nukes; russkies; subs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: caltrop
Yeah, yeah, you also predicted that Jeb Bush would get his butt kicked in the last election.
41 posted on 09/12/2003 7:42:39 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: per loin
Hey, that's the demo-dimwit game plan.
42 posted on 09/12/2003 7:46:49 AM PDT by Donna Lee Nardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: per loin
Nice touch, it surely would be the end of the Democrat Party:); it could end much of the crime, poverty and welfare. Our country might become instantly solvent.
43 posted on 09/12/2003 7:53:25 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
IMO, Iraqi WMD proof will surface right before the election of 2004. We are collecting it as you read. Do you really want to go down this road? To use a comedic metaphor: You're the straightguy being set up for a very funny punchline!

At this point we have proof of his other weapon of mass destruction in the Iraqi killing fields. Saddam is looking more and more like Pol Pot everyday.

Anyway, seems to me that striking Saddam prior to his acquisition of nukes was best strategy. Don't you? The proof is with NK: We can't simply attack NK NOW with the nuclear threat in the mix! If Saddam was in the same position as NK is now we could not attack Iraq the same way. This is precisely the reason for Israel's pre-emptive strike on Iraqi (French) nuclear reactor in 1981 (You remember the Israeli strike when all the world condemned them as insane. Even The Clash lampooned Israel in "Rock The Casbah"--this is not kosher). Israel knew that Saddam would use the threat card once he acquired the nukes. Moreover, the Israeli's knew that once nukes were acquired then the entire arab world would be emboldened to destroy her. Nukes change the debate, just look at our handling of Pakistan.

Further, NK was Saddam's ally. This newest NK nuke development was known by the Bush team. The scenario of our troops prepared to attack as a NK nuke shows up in Iraq would have been a miserable miscalculation on our part. NK was sending everything else to Saddam, why not a nuke? Come on, publius: Let's use logic and reason in this matter, rather than mindless slogans.

My only hope is that we extract the NK cancer before it spreads. Otherwise, you and I are a short-list for nuclear destruction.

Finally, your tagline is silly. CA recall is in their constitution. It's law! Lest you forget, Grey Davis sought recall proceedings in 1989.
44 posted on 09/12/2003 8:03:04 AM PDT by sully777 (We have need of history, not to fall back on, but to see if we can escape from it--Ortega Y Gasset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
PING

Any new information from your side?
45 posted on 09/12/2003 8:25:35 AM PDT by FreepForever (ChiCom is the hub of all evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: meg70
Hmm, this is suppose to be based on the SS-N-6 launched from Yankee Class subs. It has a range of only 3200km.
46 posted on 09/12/2003 8:26:39 AM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg70
I am going into my bunker/shelter now. Would someone *ping* me when it is over?
47 posted on 09/12/2003 8:29:52 AM PDT by cibco (Xin Loi... Saddam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Some day they'll even learn how to aim it.

With any luck, they'll get it right in time for the DNC convention in Boston. I'll volunteer to paint the bullseye on the roof.

48 posted on 09/12/2003 8:31:57 AM PDT by antiliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Just to refresh your memory, until the Russert debate when McBride shot himself in both feet, JEB was looking at a very close race. I also think I said he could lose (and probably should), not that he definitely would.
49 posted on 09/12/2003 8:37:15 AM PDT by caltrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: meg70
October 1999 DPRK potential missile range. No suprises here, they been expecting it for years.
Who thought the North Korea ICBM's wouldn't reach the US mainland?

Congressional report 1999: http://russia.shaps.hawaii.edu/security/nkag/report.html


50 posted on 09/12/2003 8:39:19 AM PDT by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
The left will simply change their tune. The media will suffer amnesia on their behalf and the bashing of the President will continue.

After all, the money could be used for 'programs' for the poor. To hell with national security.

51 posted on 09/12/2003 8:55:29 AM PDT by OldFriend ((Dems inhabit a parallel universe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Pay them in Plutonium.
52 posted on 09/12/2003 9:01:38 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
"The development indicates cooperation between North Korea and Russian entities and scientists AP said, citing the unidentified offical."

PING!

53 posted on 09/12/2003 12:24:43 PM PDT by Orion78 (I WILL NEVER FORGET!!! FREE IRAN!!! BUSH 2004!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
Hows about we take the 'South' out of South Korea and make that country the island of Korea?
54 posted on 09/12/2003 3:42:51 PM PDT by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: sully777
"NK was sending everything else to Saddam, why not a nuke?"


There was nothing of NK origin in the Iraqi Armed Forces. You are thinking of Iran which bought modified SCUDs from NK and used them against Iraq. All the Iraqi SRBM/MRBM were of Soviet origin or new-build/modified by the Iraqi's themselves. China supplied F-7 fighters, but NK supplied nothing of military significance.
55 posted on 09/12/2003 4:36:04 PM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Let's see. NKorea sends a missle, blows up...uhhh, Cleveland. Ok, now what are they gonna do with their remaining 15 minutes of life?

Who said they'd get 15 minutes after this? If this were to occur, I'd be in NK in a nanosecond and kick every single one of their behinds all by myself.


56 posted on 09/12/2003 5:31:46 PM PDT by rdb3 (Which is more powerful: The story or the warrior?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dirk McQuickly
the participant who indicates he is willing to use their weapons in spite of MAD will win in the end.

Assume that everyone who has them is willing to use them. Nothing counts but actual use.

57 posted on 09/12/2003 5:35:02 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Orion78
It is all rumors and gossips.
I met with that before when I lived in former USSR so I have immunitet to this now.
If there was evidence as this article allerge then let them show it. Then I will make my conclusions.
Or it will be the same as "the WMD of Iraq".
I disagree to deem rummors and gossips or pure speculations as solid facts. Sorry it is not convincing.
58 posted on 09/12/2003 5:49:34 PM PDT by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Orion78
All the Iraqi SRBM/MRBM were of Soviet origin or new-build/modified by the Iraqi's themselves. ===

Yeah exactly. But no one didn't appologize before Russia for lot of accusations toward her which are not true.
59 posted on 09/12/2003 5:52:24 PM PDT by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

Comment #60 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson