Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN Sets Nuclear Deadline, Iran Walks Out in Protest
Yahoooooooooo via Reuters ^ | 9/12/03

Posted on 09/12/2003 1:02:33 PM PDT by areafiftyone

VIENNA (Reuters) - The U.N.'s nuclear watchdog on Friday set Iran an October 31 deadline to prove it had no secret atomic weapons program, prompting Tehran to threaten a "deep review" of its cooperation with the agency.

Following intense U.S. pressure for action against Iran, the 35-nation board of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) passed a resolution setting the deadline. Iran's delegation stormed out of the closed-door meeting, accusing Washington of having new invasion plans after Iraq (news - web sites).

The toughly worded resolution gives Iran -- branded by the United States last year as part of an "axis of evil" with pre-war Iraq and North Korea (news - web sites) -- one last chance to prove it has been complying with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

The United States says Tehran has violated the treaty in its effort to develop atomic weapons secretly. Iran, which denies the allegation, could face economic sanctions if reported to the U.N. Security Council for breach of its NPT obligations.

"We will have no choice but to have a deep review of our existing level and extent of engagement with the agency vis a vis this resolution," said Iran's ambassador to the U.N. in Vienna, Ali Akbar Salehi.

His comments were in a written speech he distributed to reporters as he left the IAEA boardroom just before the resolution was passed.

Salehi insisted Iran is a loyal member of the NPT community.

"We reject the ultimatum in this (resolution)," he said, adding Iran "is a fervent subscriber to the NPT, a loyal party to it and a staunch promoter of the Middle East as a nuclear free zone."

After the U.S.-led war on Iraq, Salehi said that it was clear the administration of President Bush (news - web sites) "entertains the idea of invasion of yet another territory, as they aim to re-engineer and reshape the entire Middle East."

IRAN SEEN STAYING IN NPT

Although Iran's statement to the board was harsh and appeared to imply that it might pull out of the IAEA or even the NPT, diplomats said that it would probably continue cooperation with the IAEA and would accept limited inspections.

"They wouldn't likely pull out of the IAEA at this point," a Western diplomat told Reuters. "This would be too much."

Salehi also lashed out at Israel. "Among those who have pursued and produced nuclear weapons outside The Five (official nuclear weapons states), Israel gets way with murder. It is pampered instead of being chastised."

Israel, like India and Pakistan, has never signed the NPT. It has also never acknowledged having nuclear weapons, though non-proliferation experts say no one doubts Israel has them. The U.S., China, Britain, France and Russia are "The Five."

Washington had originally lobbied for the board to report Iran to the council this week, but backed off when it saw the majority of board members wanted to give Iran a final chance and a deadline to prove it had been complying with the NPT.

The Malaysian ambassador to the IAEA, Hussein Haniff, said that the choice to adopt the resolution without a vote meant that individual countries had the right to issue their own interpretations of its text.

One of the sticking points in negotiations on the resolution was its implied threat that Tehran must enable the IAEA to come to a "definitive" conclusion on Tehran's nuclear plans by November or go to the Security Council for possible sanctions.

 

The Malaysian envoy handed out a written statement on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), which has 15 seats on the board, which said that NAM interpreted the words "definitive conclusions" to mean "appropriate or precise conclusions."

NAM had tried to get the United States to make this change in the resolution, but Washington refused, saying it would have weakened it and enabled Tehran to escape going to the Security Council in November.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iaea; iran; nuclear; southasia; un

1 posted on 09/12/2003 1:02:34 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Iran's delegation stormed out of the closed-door meeting, accusing Washington of having new invasion plans after Iraq

Be afraid Iran. Be very afraid. Aya-told-ya!

Prairie

2 posted on 09/12/2003 1:07:42 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (I have several taglines stored in my attic. I just can't climb up to bring any down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
My heart just bursts for the poor folks who are offended by the idea that eliminating terrorists and those who view them sympatheicly, is a terrible idea. Could someone please explain why Iran needs nuclear weapons? Nobody is intent on invading them any longer. Perhaps Woopie Goldberg, sensitive and caring ombudsman for the misunderstood mid-easterner that she is, could explain this.
3 posted on 09/12/2003 1:08:01 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
He knows when you've been sleeping,
he knows when you're awake.

He knows when you've been bad or good,
so be good for goodness sake...

4 posted on 09/12/2003 1:09:23 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Why does the UN tolerate this? They should pass a resolution or something to show they're vey series.
5 posted on 09/12/2003 1:10:29 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevao
"Why does the UN tolerate this? They should pass a resolution or something to show they're vey series."

It is very series!

Means they have 13 years to go.

6 posted on 09/12/2003 1:13:26 PM PDT by G.Mason (Lessons of life need not be fatal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
accusing Washington of having new invasion plans after Iraq.

Here's to hoping they are correct on this one....

7 posted on 09/12/2003 1:14:02 PM PDT by b4its2late (There are 3 kinds of people: those who can count & those who can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Could someone please explain why Iran needs nuclear weapons?

None, other than they want to bomb all of us infidels back to the 7th century. Iran is the birthplace of modern terrorism.

8 posted on 09/12/2003 1:16:14 PM PDT by b4its2late (There are 3 kinds of people: those who can count & those who can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Revenge is a dish best served cold.
9 posted on 09/12/2003 1:24:19 PM PDT by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: billorites
When you walk out that door, don't let the cruise missile hit you in the arse.
10 posted on 09/12/2003 1:37:17 PM PDT by zencat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
To quote the Gipper: "The bombing starts in five minutes".
11 posted on 09/12/2003 1:38:34 PM PDT by exit82 (Constitution?--I got your Constitution right here!--T. Daschle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
After the U.S.-led war on Iraq, Salehi said that it was clear the administration of President Bush "entertains the idea of invasion of yet another territory, as they aim to re-engineer and reshape the entire Middle East."

Salehi's paying attention.

12 posted on 09/12/2003 3:57:29 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bump
13 posted on 09/12/2003 4:31:28 PM PDT by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread | DoctorZin

Click on the link above!

"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”


14 posted on 09/12/2003 10:35:55 PM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Proving why they need nukes...is virtually impossible. I will make a fair estimate that the nuclear program is run by the Mullahs though. Would be kinda funny to have a bunch of religious nuts running your nuclear program.
15 posted on 09/12/2003 10:41:55 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
Yeah, that would be my goal. Smirk. Their's will be the first nuke missiles with turbans instead of nose cones.
16 posted on 09/12/2003 10:45:15 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson