Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Party of Death vs. The Party of Slow Suicide
Washington Dispatch ^ | 9/14/03 | Patrick Rooney

Posted on 09/15/2003 8:01:17 AM PDT by Mark Felton

Once upon a time, there were essentially two political parties in America—the Democrats, the party of the blue-collar man; and the Republicans, the party of the white-collar man. Two parties, two visions, yet both American. Today, there are still two major parties in America—the Democrats, the party of death, and the Republicans, the party of slow suicide. The names may have remained the same, but the times, they have a--changed.

My parents were “New Deal” Democrats—they believed that Franklin Roosevelt and his big government helped get us out of the Great Depression. While that point is certainly debatable, it is certainly true that Franklin Roosevelt wasn’t Howard Dean.

My folks were hard working, bill paying, church-going people. They sacrificed and sent their kids to Catholic school, so we could get a better education than they themselves were able to get. My dad was a combat Vet, and proudly flew the colors at all appropriate holidays. He would not have recognized John Kerry. My mom was a “homemaker” when the word wasn’t considered an insult. Trust me, she wouldn’t have recognized Hillary Clinton.

Viewing today’s Democratic Party is mind numbing. The party’s total degeneration is now complete. And all the old rules of civilized discourse are gone. We have Bill Clinton and his Jim Jones followers to thank for that. His behavior in office hit new lows, and he pulled a whole political party down with him.

Now it’s considered okay to lie, to cheat, to steal in order to “win”. To rip the Commander In Chief while the man is leading a war for our nation’s survival. To blame the man for his “failure” in the war on terror when everyone knows liberal Democrats have been terror’s best friend. The leadership of this party is wicked to the core, and following them leads to certain death.

Unchecked abortion, revolving door immigration, rampant homosexuality, backbreaking taxes, crippling regulation, the rise of the U.N. and N.E.A., the shredding of the Constitution—the list goes on ad nauseam. This is the legacy of the modern Democratic Party.

The main alternative is the Republican Party. A party that accomplished some remarkable things over the years, like freeing the slaves and winning the Cold War. But something has happened to the Grand Old Party.

Many of the GOP’s positions will bring us to the same destination (death) as the Democrats, only slower. Example: immigration. Where the Democrats seek to destroy the United States with open, uncontrolled immigration, the Republicans apply window dressing, yet keep the borders open, in an effort to win votes and not offend Hispanics.

The Republican strategy appears to be to win now and to hell with the succeeding generations. It’s kind of like the late Washington Redskins’ coach George Allen’s “the future is now” strategy.

Republicans who follow such a strategy are ensuring the eventual demise of their own party as the more illegal immigrants they allow in, the worse their chances become of winning office in the future. This ain’t hard to figure out, folks.

On many other issues, the Republicans’ strategy of slow strangulation is evident. Take the growth of government itself, which was once considered a great evil. Ronald Reagan himself said, “Government is the problem.” Now Republican leaders are all too happy to grow the government, thereby increasing its power to enslave the average American.

Republicans are happy to let organizations like the NEA grow in power, as they preside over the brutalizing of our children’s minds, spirits, and sometimes bodies. When will the people realize that they cannot take back their culture while the NEA maintains control over their children? Remember the words of Hitler: “When an opponent declares, "I will not come over to your side," I calmly say, "Your child belongs to us already.”

Republicans cannot even muster enough strength to stop the obvious brutality of partial birth abortion, or object when the left removes the Ten Commandments from a state courthouse, or speak up when “apple pie American” groups like the Boy Scouts are preyed upon by homosexual activists and traitorous judges.

The only viable alternative for those of all political persuasions is a strong stand for truth which would bring life and hope to this nation. While the current Democratic Party is by far the larger evil, choosing the big lie or the smaller lie both lead to death at varying speeds.

This is not a call for the abandonment of the classic two-party system. But it is a call, to either choose the speed of this nation’s death, or demand a better set of choices from your party. I recommend the latter.

Patrick Rooney is the Director of Special Projects at BOND, the Brotherhood Organization of A New Destiny, a nonprofit organization dedicated to “Rebuilding the Family By Rebuilding the Man.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
"Were parties here divided merely by a greediness for office,...to take a part with either would be unworthy of a reasonable or moral man." --Thomas Jefferson to William Branch Giles, 1795. ME 9:317

1 posted on 09/15/2003 8:01:17 AM PDT by Mark Felton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
A real conservative party not a CINO (conservatives in name only) party like the Republicans.
2 posted on 09/15/2003 8:04:07 AM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
THE SKY IS FALLING I TELL YOU! IT'S FALLING!!!
3 posted on 09/15/2003 8:05:25 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
I don't agree with his opening sentence.
4 posted on 09/15/2003 8:05:54 AM PDT by dead (Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Whine, whine, whine ...
5 posted on 09/15/2003 8:10:50 AM PDT by moyden2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Great quote - and very timely for California republicans.
6 posted on 09/15/2003 8:11:13 AM PDT by skeeter (Fac ut vivas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
revolving door immigration

Revolving door? Seems that it's more like a one-way entry to me.

7 posted on 09/15/2003 8:14:21 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
I hate screeds like this. They take a list of problems, blame the various parties for failing to act in the "proper way," and then end with lame prescriptions to "change," without going to the trouble of identifying how the problems started in the first place. And of course, other than the vague plea to reform, there is no suggestion of how to actually fix the problem.

The author instead elects to punt by placing the blame at the feet of the political parties. He thereby absolves the public -- both voting and non-voting -- of the blame.

As John Adams put it: "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion . ... Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

The problem is not partisan per se, it is the fact that we are less and less a "moral and religious people."

I haven't got a solution to this -- maybe there is none.

8 posted on 09/15/2003 8:15:27 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
IMPT NOTES IN ARTICLE:

The Republican strategy appears to be to win now and to hell with the succeeding generations.

Republicans who follow such a strategy are ensuring the eventual demise of their own party as the more illegal immigrants they allow in, the worse their chances become of winning office in the future.

Republicans cannot even muster enough strength to stop the obvious brutality of partial birth abortion, or object when the left removes the Ten Commandments from a state courthouse, or speak up when “apple pie American” groups like the Boy Scouts are preyed upon by homosexual activists and traitorous judges.

The only viable alternative for those of all political persuasions is a strong stand for truth which would bring life and hope to this nation. While the current Democratic Party is by far the larger evil, choosing the big lie or the smaller lie both lead to death at varying speeds.

This is not a call for the abandonment of the classic two-party system. But it is a call, to either choose the speed of this nation’s death, or demand a better set of choices from your party. I recommend the latter.

9 posted on 09/15/2003 8:19:40 AM PDT by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Great article. Bookmarked.
10 posted on 09/15/2003 8:20:10 AM PDT by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
" I haven't got a solution to this -- maybe there is none."

I gave specifics to a solution. The solution lies with each community reasserting their power to determine how their own children will be educated.

Put education in the hands of the two people who most passionately want it to succeed for the students, the teachers and the parents.

Keep education $$ away from the people who desperately want to use education to gain power and influence, the political parties, the politicians, the Unions and basically anybody who is not a classroom teacher nor has a child in the classroom.

11 posted on 09/15/2003 8:21:53 AM PDT by Mark Felton ("All liberty flows from the barrel of a gun")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
The Republican strategy appears to be to win now and to hell with the succeeding generations. It’s kind of like the late Washington Redskins’ coach George Allen’s “the future is now” strategy.

That would appear to be the "strategery" in California.

12 posted on 09/15/2003 8:26:49 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
That's a nice thing to do, all right. But it's overly simplistic. The problems with public education are a symptom, not the head of the snake.

And while it's all very well to call for us to "keep education $$ away from the people who desperately want use" them, the problem lies in figuring out how, precisely, to do that -- the solution to which you have not provided.

13 posted on 09/15/2003 8:29:10 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
The article is stupid. If the republicans do not pander to the center, then the democrats will pander to the center and win all the elections. Then the democrats will occupy the center and left, while the republicans will have only the right. If you think eventually a revolution will happen, you are wrong.

Due to the current system, an incumbent is almost impossible to beat. The way to go is to occupy the center and right and marginalize the left. The alternative is to let the democrats occupy the center and left and marginalize the right. For the most part, Bush has marginalized the left which is why they hate him with a venom that is hard to comprehend. Under Bush, the left has gotten nothing, the right has got about half the things they want and the center has got the other half.

Deny the center, and you lose.
14 posted on 09/15/2003 8:33:40 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Great article. Bookmarked.

Fits right in to my freeper profile.

Here is my take on politics There is no Constitutional justification, or encouragement for us having a two party system. So why do we have this ugly situation? Two political gangs, the Republicans and the Democrats have taken over the political system. They divide the political spoils between them and make sure no outside candidate, or third political party can ever get elected-with a few minor exceptions.

I mostly vote for the stupid, politically inept, anti labor Republicans, because I feel they do less damage to the country and family, and are more suppportive of our Constitution. So you can't really expect either gang to represent you, unless you are a member in good standing, or can buy the influence, either with money, or by delivering votes.

15 posted on 09/15/2003 8:35:23 AM PDT by Capt. Tom (anything done in moderation shows a lack of interest -Capt. Tom circa 1948)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
The author instead elects to punt by placing the blame at the feet of the political parties. He thereby absolves the public -- both voting and non-voting -- of the blame.

Too many people voting with their bellies instead of their heads, if you ask me.

I haven't got a solution to this -- maybe there is none.

Ride out the storm, and have a broom handy when the wave crashes and it's time to clean up...

16 posted on 09/15/2003 8:38:24 AM PDT by general_re (SURGEON GENERAL'S WARNING: Quitting Sarcasm Now Greatly Reduces Serious Risks To Your Health.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Ride out the storm, and have a broom handy when the wave crashes and it's time to clean up...

Good point.

17 posted on 09/15/2003 8:39:34 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
A pretty good article for a slime-pit company.

Did you see their POLL? ALL answers were anti-bush.
18 posted on 09/15/2003 8:48:35 AM PDT by steplock (www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Question of the Day



Is it odd that no weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq?

....Yes, they've had enough time to find them
....No, because they never existed
....No, it's not a priority
....I'm not sure


http://www.washingtondispatch.com/poll.shtml

19 posted on 09/15/2003 8:50:30 AM PDT by steplock (www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
The problem with all these "let's fix the political system" articles, as you so astutely recognize, is that they're all predicated on the implicit (or explicit) premise that what's happening is somehow being imposed on an unwilling populace by a gang of Dick Dastardlys, twirling their moustaches and secretly plotting the downfall of the Republic. But I think we both know that nothing could be farther from the truth - not only do the American people not see a problem, but they're generally pretty happy with how things are these days. This is what they want, and any "solution" that doesn't take that into account is doomed to failure, because it really will be an attempt to impose on an unwilling populace. Eventually there will be a price to be paid, though, and if my children are lucky, it'll fall on me and not them.
20 posted on 09/15/2003 8:51:43 AM PDT by general_re (SURGEON GENERAL'S WARNING: Quitting Sarcasm Now Greatly Reduces Serious Risks To Your Health.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
bump and read
21 posted on 09/15/2003 8:53:48 AM PDT by krunkygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
The article is stupid. If the republicans do not pander to the center, then the democrats will pander to the center and win all the elections.

Disagree. You might want to read this for some history:

Secrets of the "Reagan Democrats”

 1980   1984   1988   1992   1996 
Voting age population in millions 157.6 172.8 180.7 185.6 194.8
Democrat votes in millions 35.5 37.5 41.8 44.8 45.6
Percent of Democrat votes 23% 22% 23% 24% 23%

The fundamental reason for the victories of Ronald Reagan (1980 and 1984) and George H.W. Bush (1988) is that they ran on a solid conservative agenda that was easily understood, and believed, by conservative base voters. Both President Bush (1992) and Bob Dole (1996) lost because their campaigns lacked conservative credibility, resulting in fewer Republican votes as the conservative base abandoned them by either staying home or registering a protest vote for Ross Perot.

22 posted on 09/15/2003 8:56:21 AM PDT by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
"That's a nice thing to do, all right. But it's overly simplistic. The problems with public education are a symptom, not the head of the snake."

really?

That I can provide you an end objective with which you agree in the space of a short posting is remarkable.

But now you also expect that I lay out a grand battle plan that would accomodate all the public schools? That misses the original point.

The moment that individual communities believe they might be able to regain control of their own schools will be the moment in which a thousand viable solutions will begin to precipitate.

As for me I have several specific ideas. I have presented them to my Congressman. I have held press conferences. I have worked within the system and without. I now homeschool. My ideas may not be the best, but at least I am thinking and willing to act, and that is the real hurdle we face.

Our schools have bred out the can-do attitude. They have convinced average Americans that there is no real solution, except the status quo.

Sounds like the culture of the USSR at it's most defeatist.

PS: One idea I like is paying the schools the way we pay contract engineering companies. They are paid an hourly rate $80-125/hr for each billable teacher hour. From that income all expenses, textbooks, admin, building healthcare, etc must be paid. Rates will be negotiated based on objective standards of performance for the students and productivity of the teachers. Rates are negotiated between members of the community (elected parents, county officials) and the school district management. Hiring/firing authority rests with the community members. [there's far more to it all of course, but I don't have the time or incliniation to elaborate here just now, perhaps later]

23 posted on 09/15/2003 8:59:52 AM PDT by Mark Felton ("All liberty flows from the barrel of a gun")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
You may want to check out this blog, which seems to be right up your alley (I often post there):

http://www.brothersjudd.com/blog/

As a sample discussion item, the linked article ties in nicely with the current Freeper discussion:

http://www.brothersjudd.com/blog/archives/007931.html

24 posted on 09/15/2003 9:19:08 AM PDT by NukeMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: steplock
LOL!

You're right. The correct answer is not an option.

25 posted on 09/15/2003 9:40:38 AM PDT by Mark Felton ("All liberty flows from the barrel of a gun")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: general_re
"The problem with all these "let's fix the political system" articles, as you so astutely recognize, is that they're all predicated on the implicit (or explicit) premise that what's happening is somehow being imposed on an unwilling populace by a gang of Dick Dastardlys, twirling their moustaches and secretly plotting the downfall of the Republic. But I think we both know that nothing could be farther from the truth - not only do the American people not see a problem, but they're generally pretty happy with how things are these days. This is what they want, and any "solution" that doesn't take that into account is doomed to failure, because it really will be an attempt to impose on an unwilling populace. "

Very good point. Most people want the government to protect them from the bumps in life; some to more of a degree than other. However, to a degree powerful interest do trump popular will. Take proposition 187 in Calinfornia. It was overwhelmingly approved by the populace (approved even by Hispanics IIRC), yet Governor Davis sued to get it invalidated. Take school vounchers. Something like 80% of Black people want their kids out of failed, crime-ridden inner city schools. However, the teachers unions manage to any voucher programs watered down to the point of silliness. I think there's an element of both in modern American politics.

26 posted on 09/15/2003 9:49:32 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
The final assertion in the posted article is contradicted by your Jeffersonian quote! Agenda?
27 posted on 09/15/2003 10:00:58 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
"The final assertion in the posted article is contradicted by your Jeffersonian quote! Agenda?"

I side with Jefferson.

All free political bodies will naturally split between conservatives and liberals.

However, currently both parties are not motivated by liberal or conservative philosophies. While they each have elements of liberalism and conservatism ultimately they are dominated by simple greed.

I would like to see a re-alignment of those parties. There are conservatives in both parties. I would like to see the conservatives in the democrat party re-align themselves with the conservatives of the Republican party, join forces and establish a new party that will excite the displaced masses.

28 posted on 09/15/2003 10:10:31 AM PDT by Mark Felton ("All liberty flows from the barrel of a gun")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Republicans cannot even muster enough strength to stop the obvious brutality of partial birth abortion, or object when the left removes the Ten Commandments from a state courthouse, or speak up when “apple pie American” groups like the Boy Scouts are preyed upon by homosexual activists and traitorous judges.

I think this is a valid point. The Republicans have not been effective in curbing even the most egregious examples of politically-inspired culture rot.

29 posted on 09/15/2003 10:58:36 AM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
I think reagan won because carter was an imbecile with 20% interest rates and 10 percent unemployment. Reagan won reelection because incumbents are hard to beat. Bush won because Dukakis was a short weenie who took a tank ride. Bush lost in 92 because of the recession and hostile media. Clinton won in 96 because before the convention, Dole had no money and Clinton probably had about 100 million to spend and there was peace and prosperity. Bush won in 2000 because there was no incumbent running.

Bush may lose in 2004 because of a recession.

The rule is incumbents usually win unless the economy is bad. If no incumbent is running then the election is close.
It has little to do with conservative or liberal. You have to win the center.
30 posted on 09/15/2003 11:57:56 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

read later bump
31 posted on 09/15/2003 2:57:20 PM PDT by Pagey (Hillary Rotten is a Smug, Holier - Than - Thou Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
You missed the point of my article. There is a solution, and it's called "truth". Telling it, and living it. Using it to change your party so they represent something American again. So we can find life as a nation, not death. There is no other solution. There never has been.
32 posted on 09/16/2003 8:09:28 AM PDT by rebuildus (Choose your speed or demand some new choices!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
Your reply sounds intelligent for a minute, until examined a bit closer. So you're saying that allowing our country to be destroyed and our security threatened via illegal immigration is okay, as long as it helps you "win the center"? Think before you react.
33 posted on 09/16/2003 8:15:29 AM PDT by rebuildus (Choose your speed or demand some new choices!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rebuildus
You missed the point of my article.

And you missed the point of my reply. We can tell the truth all we want, and should do so. But until the nation decides to listen to and live by the truth, our talk will come to nothing.

34 posted on 09/16/2003 8:26:43 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rebuildus
Think before you react.

I suggest you do the same. The conservative purists would ditch the middle and lose the game. The rinos want to win the middle, hold on, and then slowly advance the ball down the field. The conservative strategy in football terms, means going deep on every play.

35 posted on 09/16/2003 8:27:09 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
"This is not a call for the abandonment of the classic two-party system. But it is a call, to either choose the speed of this nation’s death, or demand a better set of choices from your party. I recommend the latter."

Sadly, it's too late. The Second Civil War is coming and the resulting breakup of the country is inevitable. The best people will be able to do is prepare and try to survive the blood bath. I wish this weren't so but you need look no further than at whets happening in Kalifornia to see the handwriting on the wall.

36 posted on 09/16/2003 1:46:08 PM PDT by Desron13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
BUMP
37 posted on 09/29/2003 7:17:46 AM PDT by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
I appreciate the fact that Dennis Miller had a 9-11 inspired personal epiphany. He has become the pro-American Mort Sahl, but someone in the GOP needs to look at the guy's views on drugs, gun control, abortion, etc., and some of the details of the guys personal life (which the Democrats will surely attempt to exploit) before they present him as a candidate for national office. That having been said, it would be fun to watch him deflate that pompous old windbag Feinstein in a debate.
38 posted on 09/29/2003 7:57:24 AM PDT by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson