Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2003 Antarctic Ozone Hole Equals Record Size
Space Daily ^ | 09/17/2003

Posted on 09/17/2003 10:31:26 AM PDT by cogitator

Antarctic Ozone Hole Roars Back

Measurements over and near Antarctica show that ozone is decreasing more rapidly this year than in previous years and that the size of the ozone hole is now as large as the all time record size of 28 million sq. km during September 2000. This is in stark contrast to the ozone hole last year when it was the smallest in more than a decade after splitting in two during late September.

In recent years, the ozone hole is at or near its maximum size during mid-September, with the maximum sometimes reached in late September. It cannot be predicted with certainty whether the ozone hole will continue to grow during the next few weeks.

Recent variations in size, depth and persistence of the ozone hole are due to year-to-year changes in meteorological conditions in the lower stratosphere over Antarctica, rather than changes in the amount of ozone depleting chemicals present in the ozone layer.

The use of ozone depleting chemicals is presently being controlled through the enforcement of international agreements. Measurements show that most of these chemicals are decreasing in the lower atmosphere and they appear to have reached their peak in the critically important ozone layer in the stratosphere.

There is a delay in the cleansing of these chemicals from the ozone layer, and it is expected to require decades before the stratosphere returns to pre-ozone hole conditions. Complete recovery of the ozone layer will require continuing diligence with the enforcement of the international agreements.

In recognition of the importance of international co-operation on environmental issues and to commemorate the date of the signing of the Montreal Protocol in 1987, 16 September has been designated by the United Nations as International Day for the Preservation of the Ozone Layer.

On this occasion, Prof. G.O.P. Obasi, Secretary-General of the World Meteorological Organization urged all nations to pursue their efforts in the monitoring of the chemical composition of the atmosphere and in the implementation of the Vienna Convention on the Protection of the Ozone Layer and the Montreal Protocol and Amendments on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: antarctica; cfcs; environment; ozone; ozonehole; ultraviolet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
The headlines were a bit over-the-top. Bottom line: it will still take some time for the ozone layer to replenish as CFC concentrations in the stratosphere slowly decline.
1 posted on 09/17/2003 10:31:37 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cogitator
So I guess getting rid of all that R12 was just a big waste of time?
2 posted on 09/17/2003 10:34:15 AM PDT by gore_sux (and so does Xlinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gore_sux
So I guess getting rid of all that R12 was just a big waste of time?

Actually not; the article notes that improvements are being measured. It just takes time for the Earth system to react to them.

3 posted on 09/17/2003 10:36:11 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
I'm not anti-environment, but I have never seen any documentation/proof that there was NOT an ozone hole at the South Pole to begin with. If elimation of R-12 is the answer, I'm all for it, but it would be nice if I could see the "before" info, that demonstrates beyond a doubt, (sorry, but I distrust anything from the anti-Capitalist crowd, aka the "Greens").
4 posted on 09/17/2003 10:41:09 AM PDT by Malcolm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
There is no "hole." There is a "thinning" or depletion of the ozone layer.

This is caused by the low amount of sunlight in Anartica during its winter, since sunlight causes oxygen to ionize into ozone.

This has nothing to do with CFC's or Freon, but a lot to do with sunlight.

Got science?
5 posted on 09/17/2003 10:43:28 AM PDT by ido_now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
I have a physicist friend whose specialty for a number of years was observations from Antartica. He said that his evidence showed no sign of growth in the ozone hole.

Another friend who oversees grants said that only scientists who believe in a growing ozone hole are now awarded any grant money to study it.

So, I suspect that this is probably a one-time event that has nothing to do with growth in the hole. As we all know, weather and atmospheric phenomena don't obey handy little charts. They are unpredictable, at least by present knowledge.
6 posted on 09/17/2003 10:46:14 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Cool, a new record. It is going to be hard to beat this one, but if we try hard enough, I am sure that we can.
7 posted on 09/17/2003 10:47:41 AM PDT by Between the Lines ("What Goes Into the Mind Comes Out in a Life")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ido_now
There is no "hole." There is a "thinning" or depletion of the ozone layer.

This is caused by the low amount of sunlight in Anartica during its winter, since sunlight causes oxygen to ionize into ozone.

This has nothing to do with CFC's or Freon, but a lot to do with sunlight.

You are incorrect on this subject. The "ozone hole" refers to drastically lowered ozone concentrations in the Antarctic stratosphere above the winter polar vortex, due to the reactions of chlorine with ozone that are catalytically enhanced on ice crystals in polar clouds.

If you would really like to "get science", I recommend this outstanding Web site on the subject:

The Ozone Hole Tour. Part 3, "The Science of the Ozone Hole", will be of particular interest to you.

8 posted on 09/17/2003 10:51:45 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Malcolm
but it would be nice if I could see the "before" info, that demonstrates beyond a doubt,

I'm not sure what you're looking for. If you want to see what the measurements of the ozone layer (in Dobson units) looked like before the impact of CFCs began to take effect, here's the data:

This is from The History Behind the Ozone Hole

9 posted on 09/17/2003 10:55:18 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
He said that his evidence showed no sign of growth in the ozone hole.

That probably depends on what kind of data he has. The lowest concentrations don't go any lower, but the area of decreased ozone concentration is what is assessed in terms of ozone hole "growth" or "shrinkage".

10 posted on 09/17/2003 10:56:52 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
How come we didn't hear word one about this when Clinton was president?
11 posted on 09/17/2003 11:01:46 AM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Actually, I think that ido_now is correct. Not looking for a fight, but atmospheric mixing between the northern and southern hemisphere is very limited. Since almost all sources and uses of CFCs and Freon are in the northern hemisphere, normal atmospheric transport would concentrate these chemicals at the North pole, not the South pole. The fact that there is thinning at the South and not at the North is a pretty strong indicator that Man has nothing to do with it.

Now there is a very strong correlation between volvanic avtivity and ozone thinning in the respective hemisphere, particularly if the valvanoes in question are very active and generate a lot of chlorine. Measurable ozone thinning in the north did occurr, for example, after the very large Mt Pinatubo eruption. It just happens that the most active volcanoe in the world is Mt Erabus in, you guessed it, Antarctica. It's been more or less continuously erupting for decades.

12 posted on 09/17/2003 11:04:28 AM PDT by jscd3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jscd3
Man, I am one lousy speller :)
13 posted on 09/17/2003 11:05:56 AM PDT by jscd3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ido_now
Got science?

In the news this morning was the note that American pupils rank 15th in industrialized societies for ability in the 3 Rs, Reading, Math, and Science. But we're up to date with PC and dating protocol. Looks like American pre-eminence in the world is drawing to an end; that type of social evolution is usually concluded with a sudden overruning and complete destruction of the society.

14 posted on 09/17/2003 11:09:25 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
The headlines were a bit over-the-top. Bottom line: it will still take some time for the ozone layer to replenish as CFC concentrations in the stratosphere slowly decline.

Ozone, eh? That's the stuff that is created by sunshine isn't it?

Antarctica is due to receive some sunshine now after having it on backorder for six months.

Odd how this "hole" shows up more during the long Antarctic night.

15 posted on 09/17/2003 11:10:11 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Clemson University plays possum football...They play dead at home and get killed on the road.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sunshine Sister
How come we didn't hear word one about this when Clinton was president?

Look, it's obvious:

1.    All news about the ecology is bad news.

2.    All bad news about the ecology is caused by the rich Republicans.

3.    We've got to raise taxes before the ecology gets even with us.

16 posted on 09/17/2003 11:10:33 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Bottom line: it will still take some time for the ozone layer to replenish as CFC concentrations in the stratosphere slowly decline.

Why do you push this B.S.? Try reading "The Holes in the Ozone Scare."

17 posted on 09/17/2003 11:13:55 AM PDT by saminfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gore_sux
Worth repeating, 1 & a 2,

So I guess getting rid of all that R12 was just a big waste of time?

All the bogus & scary "Reefer Madness" research can be traced to cloaked industry sponsorship.

18 posted on 09/17/2003 11:13:57 AM PDT by norraad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Surely, Bush is to blame.
19 posted on 09/17/2003 11:13:57 AM PDT by rintense (9-11-01: Never Forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Bottom line: it will still take some time for the ozone layer to replenish as CFC concentrations in the stratosphere slowly decline.

Why do you push this B.S.? Try reading "The Holes in the Ozone Scare."

20 posted on 09/17/2003 11:13:57 AM PDT by saminfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson