Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Brief Compilation of DemocRAT Hypocrisy
September 2003 | Persons Quoted

Posted on 09/19/2003 8:15:48 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998.

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do." Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002.

"[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.

SO NOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WMD'S AND HE TOOK US TO WAR FOR HIS OIL BUDDIES??? Right!!!


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigfatlies; hypocrisy; lies; lyingliars; morelies; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-93 next last
Just a reminder to everyone of the 180 degree turn our patriotic RAT politicians have taken on this most vital matter.
1 posted on 09/19/2003 8:15:48 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; floriduh voter; JohnHuang2; EternalVigilance; The Hose; bigbuck; Dog; Dog Gone; ...
Just a refresher on some quotes from an enemy as brutal and vicious as Al Qaeda.
2 posted on 09/19/2003 8:19:31 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Excellent work, friend. Thanks for the ping.
3 posted on 09/19/2003 8:21:58 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Thank you and you're welcome.
4 posted on 09/19/2003 8:23:49 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
This one deserves a MEGA PING...coming up...
5 posted on 09/19/2003 8:26:01 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Good work!
6 posted on 09/19/2003 8:26:26 AM PDT by tje (There is nothing more serious than pleasure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Thanks for the post. Bump!
7 posted on 09/19/2003 8:27:55 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER; xm177e2; mercy; Wait4Truth; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ...
More reminders -- if any were needed -- why Ann Coulter wrote her latest runaway bestseller, Treason.


8 posted on 09/19/2003 8:28:16 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Thanks for the list. Great stuff.
I've printed a couple of copies to send to an old friend of mine who leans to the Left when he's not sitting right in front of me.

Should be fun for me,and uncomfortable for him.

Pax-Aye
Pompah
9 posted on 09/19/2003 8:30:43 AM PDT by Pompah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Great effort, my friend..kudos to ya.....BTW..off topic a bit..but something you might want to chew on and ponder....before the war, everyone accepted..indeed, we had hard intelligence.. that Saddam had about 8-10 mobile SCUD launchers and 30-40 SCUDS in the western desert.....that's why the Aussie SF troops were deployed out there..remember, they found the large number of camaflogued MIGS....and we had extensive anti-SCUD patrols before and during the war....Now, as one who followed the war reporting closing....there was not ONE report of a destroyed mobile launcher or a SCUD installation...so, where'd they all go?..they weren't driven across the desert to Syria at night....they're kind of hard to miss..these are a little bit bigger than a Toyota SUV..
10 posted on 09/19/2003 8:32:20 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Good find by bob & bookmarked.
11 posted on 09/19/2003 8:32:49 AM PDT by floriduh voter (http://www.conservative-spirit.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Now, as one who followed the war reporting closing....there was not ONE report of a destroyed mobile launcher or a SCUD installation...so, where'd they all go?..

I'm hoping they'll be prominently mentioned in Gray's upcoming report on WMD. Complete with pictures of the destroyed units and chemical analysis of the warhead contents.

12 posted on 09/19/2003 8:47:25 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pompah
Should be fun for me,and uncomfortable for him.

ROFLMAO.......let me know how much he squirms.

13 posted on 09/19/2003 8:49:00 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan; tje
glad you liked it and use it frequently.
14 posted on 09/19/2003 8:50:41 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Fantastic work!!! Now, let's hang the pukin hipocrites with their own verbal diahreah!!! (never could spell that wurd)

It's time for Damnocrats in disarray! Hit 'em again... harder, HARDER!!!

15 posted on 09/19/2003 8:53:06 AM PDT by SierraWasp (Forget Party Politics... Re-register "decline to state" and become truly Independent!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Maybe, just maybe..we'll discover the WMD's..about the day after Dean accepts the Dem nomination....
16 posted on 09/19/2003 8:55:03 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Bump!
17 posted on 09/19/2003 9:15:40 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER; JohnHuang2
Big effin' Truth Bump! With a good weekend wish to all....
18 posted on 09/19/2003 10:15:42 AM PDT by eureka! (Rats and Presstitutes lie--they have to in order to survive.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
With a good weekend wish to all....

You do the same.

19 posted on 09/19/2003 11:01:55 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
Bump
20 posted on 09/19/2003 11:17:04 AM PDT by Havoc (If you can't be frank all the time are you lying the rest of the time?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; BOBTHENAILER
The hypocrisy of the wacko left is astounding!
21 posted on 09/19/2003 11:29:14 AM PDT by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
A Brief Compilation of DemocRAT Hypocrisy or A Brief Compilation of Republican incompetence?

Doesn’t that fact that Clinton and the dumbacrats believed in the existence of Saddam’s WMD cause you the least bit of concern that they were wrong? Somehow, the fact that Clinton believed that Saddam posed a threat to the US doesn’t raise my confidence in the truth of the matter. It does raise red flags when I hear President Bush agreed with him.

22 posted on 09/19/2003 11:41:14 AM PDT by thtr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thtr
It does raise red flags when I hear President Bush agreed with him.

You gotta be kidding, right?

If not, you need to ask the Kurds and the Iranians if Saddam had or used WMD.

Course then, he probably destroyed them and lied about it so he could undergo YEARS of sanctions, then invasion, when all he really needed to do is let thousands of inspectors in to prove he didn't have any, right?

23 posted on 09/19/2003 11:52:25 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
You gotta be kidding, right?

Then where are they?

24 posted on 09/19/2003 11:56:27 AM PDT by thtr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
I just love saving and forwarding lists such as these.Thanks for a great post,which I plan on using throughout this weekend on several different liberal friends.LOL
25 posted on 09/19/2003 12:23:47 PM PDT by Pagey (Hillary Rotten is a Smug, Holier - Than - Thou Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pagey
Thanks for a great post,which I plan on using throughout this weekend on several different liberal friends.LOL

You're welcome and have fun listening to the tap dancing from your liberal friends.

26 posted on 09/19/2003 12:27:53 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: thtr
You are on the wrong site.

Try www.du.com

27 posted on 09/19/2003 12:47:24 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
You are on the wrong site. Try www.du.com

Perhaps you don’t know what this site is all about. From the FreeRepublic splash page:

“We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America”

That means both Republican and Democrat fraud and corruption.

28 posted on 09/19/2003 12:58:01 PM PDT by thtr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: thtr
Gee, thanks for the lesson. So where's the corruption in this administration that you are rooting out?
29 posted on 09/19/2003 1:02:10 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Magnificently outstanding post.......
30 posted on 09/19/2003 1:07:41 PM PDT by bert (Don't Panic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
thanks a million
31 posted on 09/19/2003 1:11:12 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
DemocRATS invented hypocrisy !! ...




Swooooooosh !!


32 posted on 09/19/2003 1:33:27 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
”So where's the corruption in this administration that you are rooting out?

Deciding to sacrifice American soldier’s lives to overthrow an Arab dictator and have the US taxpayer foot the bill for the reconstruction of an Islamic state – Telling the American people that Iraq’s WMD posed a significant threat to the United States and now is unable to find any proof of their existence.

33 posted on 09/19/2003 1:58:24 PM PDT by thtr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

bttt
34 posted on 09/19/2003 3:10:10 PM PDT by Pagey (Hillary Rotten is a Smug, Holier - Than - Thou Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: thtr
US taxpayer foot the bill for the reconstruction of an Islamic state –L

Islamic State? State your proof.

Your a fool who needs to pull your head out of your Hillary.

35 posted on 09/19/2003 3:15:53 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Great job!!
36 posted on 09/19/2003 3:24:40 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Islamic State? State your proof.

If you really think that Iraq will be some Middle Eastern democracy then you are incredibly naive. That notion is an absurd construct designed to keep the Republican sheep in line. How’s that “democracy” stuff working out in Afghanistan? Where are those weapons of mass destruction? All you can do is throw insults...

37 posted on 09/19/2003 3:28:03 PM PDT by thtr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: thtr; Diogenesis; Grampa Dave; Ragtime Cowgirl; Darksheare
All you can do is throw insults...

That's all you fuc-ing deserve, you friggin' idiot. Check the FR archives for an article in the WSJ entitled "What the Iraqis Really Think".

It is a poll conducted by James Zogby in Iraq, polling Iraqis. BTW, since you're so dense (another deserving insult), Zogby is no friend of this admin. I ain't gonna do your homework, DU troll, look it up yourself and read it and weep.

As to the WMD, patience, fool, all in good time.

As to Afghanistan, check Diogenisis' "Gotta See This" threads. Same for Iraq.

As to the good news in Iraq, which doesn't fit your DNC talking points, check out Ragtime Cowgirl's threads on the stuff you DNC kool-aid drinkers don't want to see the light of day.

Go back to DU a$$hole.

38 posted on 09/19/2003 7:38:39 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Thanks so much.
39 posted on 09/19/2003 7:53:20 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
As to the WMD, patience, fool, all in good time.

Ha! That’s a joke. How much time? A year? 2 ? 4? - Oh yeah, I forgot. Bush is saving it to humiliate his opponents. The fact is (and it is a fact) there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. President Bush sent our troops into harms way based on faulty information. Men and women died in a cause based on that faulty information and now the American taxpayer is about to pay for the rebuilding of an Islamic state.

Like most sheep who can’t (or won’t) think for themselves, you can’t even present an argument to the facts. You can only insult and point other threads (as if that carries any weight). You don’t even have the courage to debate on you own; relying on others to come to your defense.

40 posted on 09/19/2003 8:25:40 PM PDT by thtr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
bump
41 posted on 09/19/2003 8:27:07 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thtr
• Asked to name one country they would most like Iraq to model its new government on from five possibilities -- neighboring, Baathist Syria; neighbor and Islamic monarchy Saudi Arabia; neighbor and Islamist republic Iran; Arab lodestar Egypt; or the U.S. --the most popular model by far was the U.S. The U.S. was preferred as a model by 37% of Iraqis selecting from those five -- more than Syria, Iran and Egypt put together. Saudi Arabia was in second place at 28%. Again, there were important demographic splits. Younger adults are especially favorable toward the U.S., and Shiites are more admiring than Sunnis. Interestingly, Iraqi Shiites, coreligionists with Iranians, do not admire Iran's Islamist government; the U.S. is six times as popular with them as a model for governance.

Since you won't look it up yourself, lazy a$$hole, here is your answer to our building and Islamic state. As I said, read it and weep.

You can only insult and point other threads (as if that carries any weight). You don’t even have the courage to debate on you own; relying on others to come to your defense.

I'll debate your sorry a$$ anyday, anywhere, anytime. The above quote from the article you won't read is defeat number one. As to courage, name the place and time, pal, and I'll be there . I only pinged the others to expose a DU troll, so all could see. I don't need their help with you.

The fact is (and it is a fact) there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Prove it.

42 posted on 09/19/2003 8:48:03 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Terrific compilation of Democrat hypocrisy. Saving this one!
43 posted on 09/19/2003 8:50:41 PM PDT by arasina (Hillary thinks being shrill is the same thing as standing up for principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arasina; kayak
Thanks, but I found out earlier, that kayak posted the same thing within a thread a day or so ago.

I've been dueling with a DU troll and I found Kayak's posting of this to another thread.

Didn't mean to steal your thunder Kayak, but I found your posting within another thread when tracking the postings of one "thtr".

44 posted on 09/19/2003 9:03:41 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002.

What a treasonous piece of dung Graham is. I can't find the darned quote from the recent debate aired on FNC, but it was summarized in a report like this:

"...the Democratic candidates attacked President Bush for the state of postwar Iraq, with Sen. Bob Graham of Florida charging that Bush had deliberately misled the country before the war.

45 posted on 09/19/2003 9:09:44 PM PDT by arasina (Hillary thinks being shrill is the same thing as standing up for principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
As I said, read it and weep

Oh my God, You are actually basing you argument on a poll????? And who took this poll, and who was polled? This is laughable! - You have no understanding of Middle Eastern culture. There is absolutely no chance that Iraq will establish a democracy. The second our troops leave, the country will dissolve into civil war. (Perhaps sooner). Meanwhile the US taxpayer will spend years sinking money into a bottomless pit of re-building schemes designed to keep party contributors happy and fat. The sad thing is Republicans like you will politely “bend over” and pay the price.

Prove it

There is nothing to prove. They don’t exist. You can’t prove some doesn’t exist because… it doesn’t exist. But the fact that you can’t point to any evidence, and that our government has not pointed to any evidence re-enforces the fact that WMD do not exist in Iraq.

I’ll ignore all the “tough man” talk, the boorish language and the hackney “DU troll” talk; it’s typical of those that can’t phrase an argument.

46 posted on 09/19/2003 9:21:52 PM PDT by thtr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
I forwarded this to two of my sisters in Texas. One is pro-Bush, the other extremely anti-Bush. Can't wait to hear from the latter. (LOL)
47 posted on 09/19/2003 9:23:12 PM PDT by bjcintennessee (Don't Sweat the Small Stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
bump.
48 posted on 09/19/2003 9:24:14 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thtr
I’ll ignore all the “tough man” talk, the boorish language and the hackney “DU troll” talk; it’s typical of those that can’t phrase an argument.

As we used to say in New Mexico,

DON'T LET YOUR MOUTH CASH A CHECK, YOUR ASS CAN'T BACK UP.

49 posted on 09/19/2003 9:31:54 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: bjcintennessee
Hve fun with the latter.
50 posted on 09/19/2003 9:33:28 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson