Wesley Clark Tells AP He Wouldn't Back Iraq War (Another Flip-Flop)

AP ^ | September 19, 2003 | Mike Glover

[Peach]

Guess it poll well with the base.

[PJ-Comix]

Watching Weasley Clark in next week's debate will be VERY ENTERTAINING....and hilarious!

[Shermy]

Here's a Feb 16, 2003 Meet the Press transcript with Clark.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/natocommand2/message/1532

I'm thinking about posting it here. His whole argument about Iraq is basically to wait a month to get "allies." He means France, a France who said "no" to any military action ever. And rejected plans before Iraq did.

He also talks about "bags of anthrax" and the ievitability of the war. I think he's all over the place. Tell me what you think if you like.

- S -

[Peach]

Is he debating next week? I've been away most of the day and last I heard he had changed his mind 2 or 3 times.

[PJ-Comix]

Is he debating next week?

Yeah but here's the HILARIOUS part. Originally Clark said he wouldn't be able to attend the debate because he had a prior engagement that he couldn't get out of. What was the prior engagement that was so important that he couldn't attend the debate? A speaking engagement where he would earn buku bucks. Then an aide probably told Clueless Clark that it wouldn't look good to forsake the debate for an event whose purpose is to earn $$$ for himself so Weasely Clark did another flip-flop and agreed to attend the debate----which should be HILARIOUS to watch. Speaking of flip-flop---I am looking forward to watching Clark's Flop Sweat next week.

[PJ-Comix]

Tell me what you think if you like.

Methinks the Good Ship Clark has sunk as soon as it was launched.

[Shermy]

He's slippery. His current "anti-war" pose is different than the transcript, which his point is to wait for more support, for a month, NOT "anti-war."

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

He is a brilliant man and he is quite brazen. He has the unabashed support of the leftist media. He is a liar, and he has a faulty moral compass. Many of those who know him have expressed concerns about his behavior.

Sound familiar?

[Peach]

Thanks for the update from ole flip flop (I'll call him Flipper for short after that dolphin show). Can't wait to watch the debate.

Of course, we could probably all save time and just read the following: It's Bush's fault, It's Bush's fault, It's Bush's fault.

Do we all have that now? Okay, proceed. LOL

[Peach]

Clark never met a position he liked. So he flip flops all over the place (I'll call him Flipper here) and says nothing. Sort of Clintonesque - say a bunch of words that don't mean anything but the sheeple and DNC presstitutes gobble it up and spin it around and wallah - you have a policy position that means - nothing.

[Peach]

Sheesh - too much caffeine today - guess his support of the war didn't poll well with the base so ole Flipper has flopped again. Stay well back from the splash.

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Translation: Flip-flops (lies) are ok. It's just the politician trying to find his message.

Roger that. But don't forget that flip-flops (lies) only apply to Republicans. Just ask the same media that McVain's CFR authorizes to be the sole source of campaign information for the voters prior to elections.

[Mo1]

Clark has also stated that he will cut Defense

[Shermy]

Clark has also stated that he will cut Defense

He'll never give a specific. It's just a general assertion to gain the loony left.

[jern]

great question.

[Mo1]

I know .. but is still needs to be asked

[bruinbirdman]

"In Clark's case it was triggered by having NO PRINCIPLES except a desire for high office."

What is the poop about Clark being Klintoon's handler at Oxford during the time Slick made his foray to Russia during the Vietnam War and back through Eastern Europe?

It was my understanding that Fonda and Hayden made those recommendations. Was Clark also in a position to get Russian approval for visits?

yitbos

[prairiebreeze]

Thanks for the pings. Been out of town. Catching up. Clark is a wannabe. Let's see to it he stays that way.

Prairie