Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Larry) Klayman to enter Florida Senate race Tuesday
HillNews ^ | 9/23/03

Posted on 09/23/2003 10:03:15 AM PDT by areafiftyone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: Princeliberty
You obviously do not know HLL and her history here. You couldn't be more off target....
61 posted on 09/23/2003 10:17:00 PM PDT by M. Peach (eschew obsfucation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
We don't need a Bush-Hating "PaleoCon" in the Senate.

As if he could win the primary....or the general.
62 posted on 09/24/2003 2:52:18 AM PDT by Impy (Don't you fall into the trap, democrats are full of crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
For real? What kind of a-hole would sue his own mother?

Did he win the suit?
63 posted on 09/24/2003 2:55:02 AM PDT by Impy (Don't you fall into the trap, democrats are full of crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
With a seemingly inexhaustible armory of lawsuits, official complaints and Freedom of Information requests, Klayman’s Judicial Watch has zealously pursued politicians for alleged malfeasance.

Klayman reminds me of Marc Racicot. Anyone remember the big brainwashing and child sex slave ring they busted in his home state while he was governor, with all the videotape and all? He published an open letter, "...investigation will proceed cautiously, as it appears to involve high-ranking public officials. There is no double meaing to this letter." I don't remember any high-ranking official doing time for anything, but Racicot's next job was head of the RNC. Go figure.

And Kalyman -- he never achieves anything significant, but by taking legal action, he prevents others from taking legal action and makes a good living for himself.

64 posted on 09/24/2003 3:45:02 AM PDT by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M. Peach
I simply was pointing out that as Hillary critic
quoting an article that was attacking Klayman
and was done in defense of Clinton is no way
to go.

That article was simply a Clinton defense piece
of garbage.

65 posted on 09/24/2003 5:28:26 AM PDT by Princeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer
I, too, supported Klayman for a while. But, I became very uncomfortable about him as time went on. I agree with Miss Marple:

"Mark my words, he is going to screw up the primary, and file lawsuits against Jeb Bush. He is not a friend of Republicans, as I am sure you agree."

66 posted on 09/24/2003 6:12:17 AM PDT by Shoreratte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Princeliberty
So you quote form Clinton's defenders to attack
Klayman. And so you agree the Clinton were ok
and they certainly were going after their
enemies and abusing power.

So I guess you must really think Hillary has
lovely legs think.
Your probably all excited at her running for President.

First of all, there is something wrong with the settings on your computer. Your sentences are all cut off and it reads like a poem.

The article I posted is from Newsweek. Sorry if it exposes truth about Klayman. It's well known that the man is all hat and no cattle.

It also states why Klayman sued his mother. It wasn't to protect her, it was to get his money back for paying for his grandmother's care. You would think that a man who has raked in $75million in donations would be able to find the funds to pay for the nursing care of his own family.

Klayman is not the darling of the right. You do realized that he tried to sue George W Bush for not coming to his debate. Like Bush would ever give Klayman the time of day!!

And he has sued Cheney and Rumsfeld. Great guy, this Larry. Nothing made me laugh more than at the White House Press Corps dinner where Larry tried to weasel his way into every camera shot. He tried to nuzzle up to Aschroft's party and they all turned their backs on him. He even did a little lurking behind Dana Delany. It was comic relief.

As far as me supporting a Clinton or Hillary, you attempt at humor is beyond lame.


67 posted on 09/24/2003 7:38:21 AM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs (There is no shame in being poor, just dressing poorly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
I just type my postings out like that for the fun of it.
68 posted on 09/24/2003 11:02:53 AM PDT by Princeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Princeliberty
They aren't fun. They are very difficult to read.
69 posted on 09/24/2003 11:21:32 AM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs (There is no shame in being poor, just dressing poorly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson