Skip to comments.
Save marriage in court
Washington Times ^
| Friday, September 26, 2003
| By Richard Lessner
Posted on 09/26/2003 12:44:11 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:08:45 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
Proponents of the Federal Marriage Amendment are right: This is a political fight that is worth having. But they are wrong in thinking an amendment to the U.S. Constitution defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman will save the institution from the depredations of the postmodern deconstructionists.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: lawrencevtexas; marriageamendment
Seems to me that this article lays out precisely why a marriage ammendment SHOULD be enacted.
It would deter most judges. Without one, it will positively guarantee rulings that 'mo marriages are just peachy keen.
posted on 09/26/2003 3:25:58 AM PDT
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson