Save marriage in court

Washington Times ^ | Friday, September 26, 2003 | By Richard Lessner

[JohnHuang2]

Proponents of the Federal Marriage Amendment are right: This is a political fight that is worth having. But they are wrong in thinking an amendment to the U.S. Constitution defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman will save the institution from the depredations of the postmodern deconstructionists.

[JohnHuang2]

Friday, September 26, 2003

Quote of the Day by MissL

[Adder]

Seems to me that this article lays out precisely why a marriage ammendment SHOULD be enacted.
It would deter most judges. Without one, it will positively guarantee rulings that 'mo marriages are just peachy keen.