Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: William McKinley
By FR, I mean many of its members, who have so missconstrued, missused, and jumbled the actual meaning of NEOCON, as to now make the term uncomprehensible.

One of THE founding fathers of that movement /term, has set the deffinition. Few here, or anywhere, now, use his deffinition.

I wasn't ascribing, per se, any view to YOU ! I simply stated the facts...that by the now corrupted deffinition of the term NEOCON, Ronald Reagan IS and was one. He started his political involvement as a DEM; an FDR Dem at that. Even after his party switch, he was still an ardent supporter of FDR. This, according to the now base deffinition, Reagan is a neocon. I can not say it any plainer.

159 posted on 09/28/2003 8:25:22 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons
OK.

I see where we disagree.

You are embracing the definition of neocon that seems to be thrown around. I am rejecting it as meaningless.

Thanks.

164 posted on 09/28/2003 8:28:30 PM PDT by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson