Skip to comments.
Novak: Administration didn't 'call me to leak this'
CNN via WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Tuesday, September 30, 2003
Posted on 09/30/2003 1:29:22 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:11 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: mystery-ak
The tinfoil in me is screaming plot by the DNC. With Bush's poll numbers allegedly bad, the Dims are going to do everything in their power to get those numbers even lower. Why? So Hillary can jump in. And you know if the DNC is behind it, a Clinton can't be too far behind. A vast left-wing conspiracy, I tell you!
21
posted on
09/30/2003 3:52:00 AM PDT
by
rintense
(Psycho like Rummy)
To: rintense
Well, you can pass the tin-foil around...if the Clinton's were not involved at the begining, they are now.
22
posted on
09/30/2003 3:55:18 AM PDT
by
mystery-ak
(Happy Birthday, Mike...wish you were here.)
To: JohnHuang2
Want to bet a quarter that the 2 'senior' admin officers are RAT appointees of slick/albore's?
23
posted on
09/30/2003 4:00:03 AM PDT
by
GailA
(Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
To: mystery-ak
I swear either Bill or Hillary are pawns of the anti-christ, whoever that may be. No matter what pops up, their name is always tied to it. Talk about too much power and influence. If the public only knew what kind of shady powerbrokers these two are...
24
posted on
09/30/2003 4:06:47 AM PDT
by
rintense
(Psycho like Rummy)
To: rintense
When Ambassador Wilson was asked how he knew it was Rove, he had documents in his possession identifying Rove as the leaker from a secret investigation of the State department's Internal Security Unit.Found this on another link. If true, think Joe's got some 'splainin' to do....
25
posted on
09/30/2003 4:07:59 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: rintense; mewzilla; seamole
Remember the Sunday night the President spoke to America.......about Iraq....just recently.
There was a meeting taking place in Chappaqua between x42 and 97 and 150 of their close advisors....the excuse was to plot strategy for '06.........but what do you want to bet this came up.
26
posted on
09/30/2003 4:24:58 AM PDT
by
Dog
(This wednesday is my birthday and I officially become older than dirt....)
To: Dog
I'd love to see Wilson's phone records...
27
posted on
09/30/2003 4:26:24 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: Dog
I traced the doc comments back to
this link which has since taken down the article. Interesting. Wonder who Al Martin, the author of the article, is?
28
posted on
09/30/2003 4:44:30 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: mewzilla
This is all you need to know about Al Martin and his buddy Uri
Here!
29
posted on
09/30/2003 4:47:36 AM PDT
by
Dog
(This wednesday is my birthday and I officially become older than dirt....)
To: Dog
LOL. Thanks. Now the question is did Al make this up out of thin air, or did someone tell him that Wilson had those internal investigative docs? Inquiring minds want to know :)
30
posted on
09/30/2003 4:49:39 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: seamole
If she was in the Directorate for Operations and that information were classified, she'd probably meet the test of a 'covert agent' as defined by
50 USC Section 246:
(4) The term ''covert agent'' means -
(A) a present or retired officer or employee of an intelligence agency or a present or retired member of the Armed Forces assigned to duty with an intelligence agency -
(i) whose identity as such an officer, employee, or member is classified information, and
(ii) who is serving outside the United States or has within the last five years served outside the United States; or
(B) a United States citizen whose intelligence relationship to the United States is classified information, and -
(i) who resides and acts outside the United States as an agent of, or informant or source of operational assistance to, an intelligence agency, or
(ii) who is at the time of the disclosure acting as an agent of, or informant to, the foreign counterintelligence or foreign counterterrorism components of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; or
(C) an individual, other than a United States citizen, whose past or present intelligence relationship to the United States is classified information and who is a present or former agent of, or a present or former informant or source of operational assistance to, an intelligence agency.
Maybe there's some jurisprudence that defines this more narrowly. BTW, here's a link to a story detailing a Freedom of Information Act activist's plans to intentionally publish the names of retired (still covered, see above) covert agents which were on a New York Times website.
To: JohnHuang2
"They asked me not to use her name, but never indicated it would endanger her or anybody else. According to a confidential source at the CIA, Mrs. Wilson was an analyst, not a spy, not a covert operative and not in charge of undercover operators," Novak said.
So the
CIA confirmed the Wilson woman-of-mystery's status as a CIA op, er, non-op, an analyst, and client of Jenny Craig. The Justice Department needs to investigate the CIA.
32
posted on
09/30/2003 5:17:34 AM PDT
by
Asclepius
(karma vigilante)
To: rintense
Pawns? Maybe Bill's a pawn, to me Hillary is the anti-christ.
Before Wilson's appearance on Fox and Friends this morning, Brian Kilmeade (sp) presented some background on the story (obviously for the non-freepers in the audience). He explained Wilson's trip to Niger and his reporting method upon return. Supposedly, Wilson did not submit a written report, only an oral one. Wilson has said that his oral report was out there for all to see.
This has Bill and Hillary written all over it.
33
posted on
09/30/2003 5:21:35 AM PDT
by
Quilla
To: Dog
There is no doubt in my mind that the Clintons are pulling all the strings. And the Dems blind allegance to both of them is not of this world. Period.
34
posted on
09/30/2003 5:24:43 AM PDT
by
rintense
(Psycho like Rummy)
To: mass55th
If she was a CIA covert agent, would she be seen at such a public function? Doesn't "covert agent" mean "no apparent connection to parent agency" rather than "has no public life"? I'd imagine covert agents are seen at very public functions all the time. Those seeing them simply assume they are bureaucrats, teachers, journalists, or what have you rather than agents. Living a seemingly normal and mundane life is their cover.
To: GailA
Want to bet a quarter that the 2 'senior' admin officers are RAT appointees of slick/albore's?I think you're out of date. Don't have the articles in front of me, but IIRC the Wash Post has already backpedaled from "Senior Whitehouse officials" (Sunday) to "Administration officials" (Monday). Anybody have the exact wording? Again, I *think* "senior" has been DROPPED.
36
posted on
09/30/2003 6:06:55 AM PDT
by
Stultis
To: JohnHuang2
One wonders what level of security clearance Wilson has and if he was even capable an investigation of "yellowcake."
37
posted on
09/30/2003 6:12:07 AM PDT
by
Toespi
To: JohnHuang2
This is a setup to discredit President Bush and drag him down to the same slimy level the clinton Administration lived at.
The Left and their Media shills will scream bloody murder and demand investigations and "answers". After a while the fuss will quiet down. Much later when real answers come, it will be proven there were no Administration leaks. That will get Page 20B, if at all, by the Press and no mention on the news networks. The lasting impression left for the public is Bush is guilty, broke the law, and hid something illegal which he or his henchmen did for political gain.
This is the technique the Left has been using for decades to smear their opponents. It's the same playbook as always. Nothing has changed. It's sooooo predictable!
38
posted on
09/30/2003 8:18:10 AM PDT
by
Gritty
To: Stultis
A thought.
I was interviewing a senior administration official on Ambassador Wilson's report when he told me the trip was inspired by his wife, a CIA employee working on weapons of mass destruction. Another senior official told me the same thing. As a professional journalist with 46 years experience in Washington, I do not reveal confidential sources. Could it be that ALL are missing a point here? NEPOTISIM, and that as the English teacher on Hannity is stating, this statement is NOT CLEAR, it does not clearly state that it could be a CIA admin official, a judicial official, or State Dept official he was talking to. It assumes WE KNOW the difference.
NEPOTISIM like cronism is highly frowned upon, especially NEPOTISIM.
39
posted on
09/30/2003 1:49:32 PM PDT
by
GailA
(Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson