Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HAVE THE COURAGE TO DEBATE THE STATEMENT
Neal Boortz Home Page ^ | 10-2-03 | Neal BoortZ

Posted on 10/02/2003 5:14:20 AM PDT by Fighter@heart

HAVE THE COURAGE TO DEBATE THE STATEMENT

Make no mistake about this .. no mistake at all. The whole reason that Rush Limbaugh is under fire for his comments on Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb is simply because he is perhaps the nation's most prominent conservative ... and a white guy on top of it all! Limbaugh is seen by the left as a huge, almost insurmountable threat to their designs on regaining control in DC.

Now, incredibly, Rush Limbaugh has resigned from his position at ESPN. My guess is that the resignation was forced, but he may have just decided that life is too short to put up with this absurd squeamish PC nonsense. At any rate ... here is what Limbaugh said on that ESPN broadcast ... read it and then let's pick it apart word by word and see what we have:

"I don't think he's been that good from the get-go. I think what we've had here is a little social concern in the NFL. The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. There is a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of this team that he didn't deserve. The defense carried this team."

Do you need any further clarification of what Limbaugh said? Do I have to break it down for you? OK ... step-by-step:

1. Donovan McNabb hasn't been a very good quarterback from the beginning.

Anything racist there? If there is, I can't find it. Do we now find ourselves at the point where you cannot criticize a black athlete without being called a racist?

2. The National Football League has some social concerns.

Translation, there's a bit of political correctness in the NFL front office. I don't know if that's true or not. You tell me! Is there anything inherently wrong with bringing up the possibility?

3. Some sportswriters want to see a black quarterback do well.

Well now isn't that a shocking statement! Can you imagine that! A few weeks ago a female place kicker actually kicked a field goal in a Division 1A college football game. Do you think that it is at all possible that there were some sportswriters out there, maybe even some female sportswriters, who wanted to see that kick go through the uprights? Would that make these sportswriters sexist? So we find it perfectly reasonable to understand why a female sportswriter might want to see that gal kick that football, but you just can't imagine a black sportswriter wanting to see a black quarterback succeed? Come on, admit it. You went to government schools, didn't you?

4. Donovan McNabb has been getting more credit for the team's success than perhaps he deserves.

Maybe so, maybe not! I'm certainly not knowledgeable enough to comment on that. I couldn't name any Eagles player other than McNabb .. and if it weren't for this story I wouldn't even be able to name him. I'm just not that much of a fan. But can't a question like this be addressed to literally hundreds of players in each of the four major sports?

So .. there you go. Rush's statement broken down into four easily understandable statements, none of which is the slightest bit racially insensitive, let alone racist.

And now ... along comes Tennessee Democrat Harold Ford to share his wisdom with us on this issue. Congressman Ford, who is black, says he doesn't know if Limbaugh should have included race in his statement. Tell me, how in the hell can you try to make the point that the media, feeding on political correctness, wanted to see a black quarterback do well without mentioning in race? Ford also says that ESPN should fire Limbaugh immediately for the comment. Go over the four segments above one more time. Now tell me just which one of those statements constitutes an offense worthy of a firing! Maybe it was just time for Congressman Ford to renew his victim credentials.

Limbaugh crossed a politically correct line. Only liberals are allowed to bring race into any issue. When liberals mention race it is always a symbol and indication of their undying love for and devotion to all who cannot claim whiteness. When conservatives bring race to the table it is always because they are closet racists and just want to keep their boots on the black man's neck.

How about giving Limbaugh's statement a fair hearing? Make your case that McNabb has been all-pro from the beginning. Convince us that the NFL never gives any consideration to the dictates of political correctness. Convince me that sportswriters would never root for the success of an athlete who shares their plumbing or skin color. Then you can explain how the Eagle's success is due to the brilliance of Donovan McNabb. But ... if your goal is to attack the messenger instead of to debate the message ... then perhaps there's a place for you on the editorial board of The Washington Post.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: nealboortz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: TheOtherOne
"3. The 'media' want to see a black quarterback succeed and that is why the media over-hyped McNabb, because he is a black man and they wanted him to succeed. "

Well put and I believe that it is mostly unintentional on the media's part. They are so brainwashed and guilt ridden that their leanings toward favoritism of any minority or percieved underdog is almost innate.

Its the same, imo, as the so-called GREAT White Hope in boxing. Many a fight is over-hyped because a white boxer is involved.

Its similar to our local paper that absolutely must run a picture of black tennis player Serena Williams whether she has won, lost or withdrawn. See Tiger Woods also. (Both of whom I have respect for).

The 'media' has not CONSPIRED to be biased in favor of minorities, but they have been trained to. Its not intential, its just what they do.

21 posted on 10/02/2003 6:53:35 AM PDT by subterfuge (God will NOT be mocked!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fighter@heart
Rush was on ESPN to talk about football, not to harrumph about his political views regarding "liberal" bias in the media. What he said was not racist, but what he did do was allege racism (favoring one race over aonther) on the part of other people. That's fine when he's on the air as a political commentator, but not when he's on the air as a football analyst.

At least, not according to the people who were paying him to be a football analyst.
22 posted on 10/02/2003 7:01:31 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fighter@heart; mhking
(posting again because the duplicate thread was pulled)

I have amazed myself with how concerned I am with this. I had never realized how much he had influenced me. (for the betteR) I don't see this as a coordinated attack by the "left", but as several things bubbling in the pot for Rush.

If he had a choice, he should not of resigned. Knowing how he is, I feel he didn't have that choice. But it is just as likely he is 'tired'.

The pill thing bothers me, for I think it shows he is under exteme pressure and, if true, has some issues he needs to get straight. But it does not show hypocrasy in his political and social views.

If you apply his way of thinking, in the long run it should make him stronger, but I suspect he may just not see it as his fight anymore. The man has a lot of enemies out there, is getting older, and he has a lot of money in the bank. Golfing requires less stress.

Even if one does not believe in some of his stands on issues, I think he needs to hear from people who support him overall at this time, and I think we need to stand up without him for for him and what we believe.

23 posted on 10/02/2003 7:13:36 AM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fighter@heart
This is pretty simple, this case. Rush called the media's racial bias clearly and succinctly, and the media is outraged that their cover is blown.
24 posted on 10/02/2003 7:32:44 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Right Wing Crazy #5338526)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smiley
Do you have a link or title of the NRO article? I'd like to read it. Thanks.
25 posted on 10/02/2003 11:11:16 AM PDT by Born Conservative ("Start every day off with a smile and get it over with" - W. C. Fields)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
I'm afraid it wasn't on line (sorry if I lead you to believe that)...it was in the latest September issue of National Review...if you go on line and inquire at NRO about the article, they may be able to link it to you. I've passed the magazine on to my husband who is devouring it as we speak...:)
26 posted on 10/02/2003 11:53:31 AM PDT by smiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: smiley
Is it the current issue? If so, I'll buy it. Thanks.
27 posted on 10/02/2003 11:57:32 AM PDT by Born Conservative ("Start every day off with a smile and get it over with" - W. C. Fields)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Fighter@heart
Bump for printing later
28 posted on 10/02/2003 12:25:54 PM PDT by Pagey (Hillary Rotten is a Smug, Holier - Than - Thou Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late; Recovering_Democrat; Alissa; Pan_Yans Wife; LADY J; mathluv; browardchad

29 posted on 10/02/2003 5:07:35 PM PDT by Born Conservative ("Start every day off with a smile and get it over with" - W. C. Fields)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson