Skip to comments.Telemarketers warn of layoffs
Posted on 10/02/2003 12:31:14 PM PDT by AZLiberty
KANSAS CITY, Mo. - Losing millions of potential customers to a "do-not-call" list will almost certainly mean big layoffs at telemarketing companies, where employees already hang from one of the working world's lower rungs.
Some 2 million of the 6.5 million people who work in the industry will lose their jobs, according to the American Teleservices Association. It based its estimate on the Federal Trade Commission's prediction that 60 million Americans will eventually add their home telephone numbers to the national "do-not-call list.
According to the association, 64 percent of telemarketers are minorities, 30 percent are recent recipients of some kind of public assistance, 26 percent are single mothers, and 5 percent are physically disabled.
"These are folks who are not gonna find it easy to find a job," said Tim Searcy, the group's executive director.
The Direct Marketing Association, another industry group, asked its member companies to stop calling households on the list starting next Wednesday, even though a court battle over its legality may not be resolved by then.
A U.S. District Court judge in Denver on Thursday blocked the list on free-speech grounds. FTC Chairman Timothy Muris said Friday the agency will fight the decision, backed by new legislation rushed through Congress giving the commission more power in the matter.
There are about 166 million residential phone numbers in the United States, and telemarketers attempt up to 104 million calls to consumers and businesses every day, according to the FTC.
The reason the telemarketing industry finds itself in hot water -- folks are long tired of annoying, unsolicited calls -- is the key ingredient for the industry's success. Experts say that if just 2 percent or 3 percent of the people called buy the product being pitched, the effort is profitable.
Some telemarketing companies, such as Atlantic Tele Center, which operates in Guyana, already have laid off employees in anticipation of the registry.
ICT Group, based in Newtown, Pa., said client concerns about the registry already have contributed to losses. The company, with 11,000 employees worldwide, handles telemarketing for clients that include banking and telecommunications firms.
Other smaller firms that make calls on a contract basis for other businesses have said they'll close down rather than spend the thousands of dollars necessary to upgrade systems so they can comply with the new federal regulations.
"I think it probably will hurt some companies, and particularly the smaller operations would have a harder time absorbing the economics of adjusting to the latest regulations," said Brian M. McCutcheon, founder of SoftReach Services, Gilroy, an independent consulting practice that has helped some companies satisfy the latest government regulations.
He noted that some experts think the lists may actually help telemarketers do business more efficiently. "There's another school of thought that says these are people who are predisposed to decline any offer that you'd make on the telephone ... or to not even answer the phone, so you're actually improving to the extent that you're dealing with a pool of people who are more likely to be open to be purchasing something through a phone call."
Some companies insist the effects will be slight. They say most of their business comes from inbound calls, or from outbound calls that aren't targeted by the regulations, including existing or former customers. Companies may continue to call people on the list if they've done business with them in the past 11/2 years.
Tom Davis, the head of the nation's largest employee-owned teleservices company, Kansas City-based USA 800, said his firm, which takes mostly inbound calls, is feeling the effects of the registry already as other subcontractors that make outbound calls seek his company's business. With competition increasing, he said, some subcontractors have started offering unusually low prices for their services.
"We're seeing some price competition that we haven't seen in the past, and I attribute it to everybody really anticipating what's gonna happen here," said Davis, whose company has calling centers in suburban Kansas City, St. Joseph, Mo., and Chicago.
Telemarketers must check the federal do-not-call list every three months to determine who does not want to be called. Those who call households in the register could be fined up to $11,000 per violation.
These are not new hurdles for many telemarketing companies. Already, more than two dozen states have implemented their own do-not-call lists -- some of which offer more stringent guidelines than the FTC's.
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
It is in the breaking news sidebar!
I rather enjoy telemarketers.
I don'y buy anything, but I like to guess the state they call from.
Accents is one of my hobbies.
I've had 15 minute conversations with several people discussing their home towns and what we have in common.
Many Americans are rude, conceited and too lazy to even be concerned about other people and their jobs!
Telemarketers do not directly support the telecom infrastructure, and many of these little makeshift shops are no more than boilerroom operations, set up in Canada in order to flout state laws which otherwise restrict them.
Print advertising, Mail delivery, internet advertising, direct marketing, all are helped by this; so lay them all off, close them all down, and get the economy back on its feet and give joe blow some peace and quiet!
You mean like the debt consolidation scam that telephoned me last night?
Oh, you are one of those rich, insensitive, obese Republicans.
Talk and eat....talk and eat....never time to listen.........
Yes, you can count on this for being the Truth. The DMA and this trade group say so. It must be true.
Did you ever get a collect call telemarketer?
Is this tessalu?
Yes it is.
Will you accept the charge for a collect call from retired General Wesley Clark's campaign chairman?
Yes, of course!
tessalu, we are selling front seat tickets on the first time machine to the future.
Can we count on you for two tickets?
Sure.....how much do they cost?
Well, it's buy one, get one free.
Sign me up........
Worse yet, they will probably move the few remianing jobs off-shore (India and China are prime suspects.) Imagine getting a call from China asking you if you would like to purchase light bulbs that last for 25 years.
Bastiat's parable of the glazier strikes again.
It's unlikely that most of the people who commonly buy from telemarketers are liable to take the money they save and bury it in the back yard. It'll be spent somewhere else, generating jobs just the same.
Hmm, let's see.....
Seems like the sensitive folks at the ATA who keep track of these things should:
1. Ensure that the disabled (5%=325,000) telemarketers remain on the job. This will leave only 1,675,000 telemarketers to be laid off.
2. Ensure that most of the single mother (26%=1,690,000) remain on the job. If some of the single mothers are also disabled, the ATA gets a two-fer, and may be able to save the jobs of all the single mother telemarketers.
3. Inform the minority and on-the-dole telemarkaters that 2 million on them won't be able to continue to harass folks via the telephone anymore. Of course, some of the minority and/or on-the-dole telemarketers might also be single mothers, and/or disabled, so the ATA might get a three-fer as well.
4. Say good night to their ATA partners (you know, the big boys who really benefit from telemarketing), and drive home in their Mercedes, to their million dollar holmes, feeling good that they have taken action to save those all important telemarketing jobs for those that are the most needy.
Let them get legitimate jobs working inbound call centers. Judging from the amount of time I have to wait on hold when I want to do business on the phone, there's a severe shortage in that field.