WMD: Blair was right

The Online Sun (United Kingdom) ^ | Thursday, October 2, 2003 | TREVOR KAVANAGH

[VRWC_minion]

As if that's stopped others from committing perjury in past administration scandals

Of course,, all evidence that doesn't support your world view is all lies. How convienent for you.

[VRWC_minion]

Wraps it up for me. Saddam may have been a threat to another nation in the region, but he was not a direct and viable threat to the borders of this nation of states

Same logic applies to Osama.

[BlueNgold]

It has produced conclusive and incontrovertible evidence that Iraq was in material breach of UN Resolution 1441

In a perfect world ... End of story. To the liberal press, a fact they choose to ignore.

[windchime]

Bump!

[MEGoody]

"Will those who bleat boringly "no evidence" eat the vial of botulin? Didn't think so."

But gee, sometimes I wish they would. LOL

[mathluv]

No one is so blind as those who will not see.

[billbears]

The bulkiest item would fit in a two-garage.

Really?

U.S. intelligence indicates that Saddam Hussein had upwards of 30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agents. Inspectors recently turned up 16 of them -- despite Iraq's recent declaration denying their existence. Saddam Hussein has not accounted for the remaining 29,984 of these prohibited munitions. He's given no evidence that he has destroyed them.--SOTU address

I would really like to see how you're going to fit 29,984 warheads (or any 'munitions' capable of delivering chemical agents) in a two car garage. Now that will be a magic trick

[PhilDragoo]

billbears writes:

I would really like to see how you're going to fit 29,984 warheads (or any 'munitions' capable of delivering chemical agents) in a two car garage. Now that will be a magic trick

Dr Kay says the hunt was hampered by Iraqi obstruction, secrecy and sabotage.

He adds: “Looting destroyed important evidence of Iraq’s WMD programme. This was deliberate. Some personnel crossed borders before and during the conflict and may have taken evidence and weapons-related material.

“Even the bulkiest materials we are searching for can be concealed in spaces not much larger than a two-car garage.”

Try reading the article.

[billbears]

Okay, that's fine. Ping the whole crowd. I don't care what Dr. Kay says. I don't think he must have been listening to what President Bush promised in his SOTU address. Here is a picture of one warhead they found back in April (note also there were no WMDs found on it). If you honestly think you could fit 29,000 of those in a two car garage, you're absolutely out of your mind.

That box looks to be 1'x5' to be on the safe side. So that's five square feet. Heck son, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say it's 4 square feet. Now let's say the average one car garage is 200 square feet (10x20) measuring 10 feet high. If my math is correct you could fit 50 per level stacked all the way to the top with 500 per garage. 2 car garage makes it 1000. And Dr. Kay makes that statement? Yeah about 30 2 car garages would sound about right.

But you keep it up with Dr. Kay said this, Dr. Kay said that, and ignore the fact he told a Senate committee that he had found nothing substantial. As I said, somebody has to believe these stories, may as well be you.

[billbears]

Any reply to my #89? Are you going to argue Iraq had a magician on the order of Houdini working for them? Seriously I would like an answer of how you fit 29,984 'munitions' capable of delivering chemical weapons into a two car garage so you can keep Dr. Kay's story plausible