Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

STANEK: Is a crying baby alive?
Illinois Leader ^ | Wednesday, October 01, 2003 | Jill Stanek

Posted on 10/02/2003 8:30:02 PM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-57 last
To: Terriergal
This is from the best article ever written about abortion, imo. Barbara Curtis in "The Sisterhood, 27 Years Later"

How about it, sisters? Especially those of you who rode the crest of the second wave with me: Did you ever dream that this was where we were headed? Did you ever dream we would call a politician a friend to women - no matter how flagrantly he exploited them - as long as he continued to back abortion on demand? Did you ever dream we would enter the realms of denial required to condone a procedure in which a perfectly viable infant is pulled feet first through the birth canal until all but herhead is exposed, then stabbed in the skull to suck out her brains, delivered dead and sold to the highest bidder for body parts?

That's "a certain type of late-term procedure," according to modern feminists, who have twisted themselves like pretzels to pretend the dream did not turn into a nightmare.


51 posted on 10/03/2003 11:24:10 AM PDT by Skooz (All Hail the Mighty Kansas City Chiefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal
I'm freekin' stunned....

I'm not one to condone violence when discussing the abortion issue, but both these women need to be destroyed for the overall good of the species....


Just.... DAMN!!!
52 posted on 10/03/2003 12:36:29 PM PDT by cavtrooper21 (Shoot them if they stand. Cut them if they run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
nauseating. Makes me want to lie prostrate sobbing for days/weeks for this country. I don't know how else to express such anguish.
53 posted on 10/04/2003 8:57:33 AM PDT by Terriergal ("multipass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: cavtrooper21
I hear ya. It's funny how people justify the actions (out of frustration or hate) of pali suicide bombers but not those who might block entrance to an abortion clinic.
54 posted on 10/04/2003 8:58:45 AM PDT by Terriergal ("multipass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic
"Part of everyone's prayers should be asking God Almighty's forgiveness for America's complicity in these atrocities.

I agree that we ALL share a burden of responsibility for the horrors of abortion in our nation, especially if we are silent or do nothing to stop it.

One of the most important steps toward ending our American holocaust is convincing the masses that they personally are responsible for the continuation of abortion, through inaction and silence on this issue.

Another vital step is making America aware of the real horrors of the right to choose death for our children. Most of us live our lives in full or partial denial of the horrors of abortion. The public should be confronted with the visual truth of abortion, (http//www.abotionno.org).

I consider myself active in the pro-life movement as vice-chair of a chapter of Oregon Right to Life, but found a renewed sense of urgency in my efforts after seeing the truth with my own eyes. The pro-abortion folks will initially be angered by being confronted with the horrors of their position, because it will challenge their denial regarding the humanity of the pre-born human beings murdered by abortion. Many others may be angered because their conscience will demand a more active roll in the defense OUR children.

America suffers a self-inflicted 9/11 each and every day of every year, because of the apathy and inaction in this war on our pre-born children and our addiction to recreational, unprotected sex.

55 posted on 10/09/2003 12:29:02 PM PDT by Got a right to Life? . . Huh? (Not if you were conceived after Roe v. Wade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: StriperSniper
but have not “established a separate and independent life,” as required by Thompson

The F'in B!*%# should have her 'umbilical cord' to the taxpayers severed! (At the least.)

Wow, this is extremely late but I couldn't resist.

A quote from a Canadian:
"The reference that the baby is has "not established a separate and independent life" so it is not murder is very interesting. Does this mean that any man has the right to legally kill an ex-spouse on the grounds that she asks for financial support because she has "not established a separate and independent life"? How ludicrous."

The lady who aborted her born daughter should be aborted by the tax payers since she "has not established a seperate and independant life".

56 posted on 10/16/2003 1:17:05 PM PDT by m1-lightning (Pay your taxes with stamps. Maybe they'll get the hint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
The judge would be my choice, she is dangerous.
57 posted on 10/16/2003 1:23:14 PM PDT by StriperSniper (All this, of course, is simply pious fudge. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson