Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
but have not “established a separate and independent life,” as required by Thompson

The F'in B!*%# should have her 'umbilical cord' to the taxpayers severed!
(At the least.)

35 posted on 10/03/2003 7:12:26 AM PDT by StriperSniper (The socialist revolution is almost complete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: StriperSniper
but have not “established a separate and independent life,” as required by Thompson

The F'in B!*%# should have her 'umbilical cord' to the taxpayers severed! (At the least.)

Wow, this is extremely late but I couldn't resist.

A quote from a Canadian:
"The reference that the baby is has "not established a separate and independent life" so it is not murder is very interesting. Does this mean that any man has the right to legally kill an ex-spouse on the grounds that she asks for financial support because she has "not established a separate and independent life"? How ludicrous."

The lady who aborted her born daughter should be aborted by the tax payers since she "has not established a seperate and independant life".

56 posted on 10/16/2003 1:17:05 PM PDT by m1-lightning (Pay your taxes with stamps. Maybe they'll get the hint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson