Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
I knew it would come to this. It's the logical endpoint of the "separation" argument. We have already seen that idiot Boxer arguing in the Senate that if a hand or a foot is left in the birth canal then there is no effective separation, so sucking the brains out of the baby at that point is still permitted.

Think about what they've done here. They've invested one's "humanity" in the presence or absence of a scrap of connective tissue. That's about as poor a proxy for humanity, if one could stand the thought of such, as you can imagine.

What the pro-aborts are advocating, while straining for all sorts of logical and factual gymnastics and contortions to avoid facing, is that women have the right to kill innocent people under some circumstances, with no justification or due process or ethical obligation to consider otherwise, and no one else has the moral authority to intervene or even question it. This latest judicial outrage is just one more point to prove that this is truly a world gone mad.

47 posted on 10/03/2003 11:15:15 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: chimera
What the pro-aborts are advocating, while straining for all sorts of logical and factual gymnastics and contortions to avoid facing, is that women have the right to kill innocent people under some circumstances

Ding ding ding! WE have a winner!

This latest judicial outrage is just one more point to prove that this is truly a world gone mad.

Sadly, I have to agree... Maranatha!

49 posted on 10/03/2003 11:16:32 AM PDT by Terriergal ("multipass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson