Skip to comments.
FRNCC - "Diversity, Drugs, and a Racist Bake Sale..." By Jonathan David Morris
Free Republic Network ^
| 10-6-03
| Jonathan David Morris
Posted on 10/06/2003 12:05:21 PM PDT by Bob J
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
1
posted on
10/06/2003 12:05:21 PM PDT
by
Bob J
To: Bob J
Bttt...
2
posted on
10/06/2003 12:19:24 PM PDT
by
Chad Fairbanks
(My idea of housework is to sweep the room with a glance.)
To: All
Strong Conservative Forums Help Prevent Candidates Like This From Winning Elections
|
|
Finish Strong. Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
10/06/2003 12:20:57 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: *Wod_list
bong...
4
posted on
10/06/2003 12:27:17 PM PDT
by
cryptical
To: Bob J; jmc813
Drug abuse can adversely affect a family, don't get me wrong, but it's going to affect a family regardless of whether drugs are illegal. Same goes for fast food and alcohol, and gambling, and all-around bad attitudes. People who make poor decisions aren't criminals. They're people. In a free society, people ought to be free to screw things up and live with the consequences. It's the only way they're ever going to learn. But when we try to solve addictions by eliminating narcotics, we only create a new set of problems that affect a larger number of people on the whole. Or look at it this way: Used car salesmen don't go around shooting each other. Drug dealers do.
This guy makes a dangerous amount of sense.
5
posted on
10/06/2003 12:29:48 PM PDT
by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
To: Bob J
If the drug warriors get ahold of this, you'd better be wearing your Nomex coveralls.
6
posted on
10/06/2003 12:32:57 PM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(In for the monthly deal since 3 quarterlies ago - support Free Republic!)
To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; Bill D. Berger; ..
WOD Ping
7
posted on
10/06/2003 12:42:47 PM PDT
by
jmc813
(Arnold needs to drop out now for the good of the party.)
To: Bob J
What is this author's FReeper name?
8
posted on
10/06/2003 12:43:52 PM PDT
by
jmc813
(Arnold needs to drop out now for the good of the party.)
To: Bob J
Diversity - the Universal Racism
9
posted on
10/06/2003 12:44:27 PM PDT
by
BSunday
Bump for later.
10
posted on
10/06/2003 12:47:41 PM PDT
by
StriperSniper
(The socialist revolution is almost complete.)
To: BSunday
BUMP
11
posted on
10/06/2003 12:49:35 PM PDT
by
dcwusmc
("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
To: MrLeRoy
"This guy makes a dangerous amount of sense."Well, when you make baseless, theoretical statements like, "In a free society, people ought to be free to screw things up and live with the consequences", of course.
Can you point to where this happens today in our society?
To: robertpaulsen
Not offhand. Does that somehow invalidate his statement?
13
posted on
10/06/2003 1:01:45 PM PDT
by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
To: robertpaulsen
It happens anyway. How many people do you think have used illegal drugs? 1%? 5%? 10%? It's a damn lot I tell you, and the VAST majority are never caught. Why do you think that when the LA police made 20 TON cocaine bust a few years ago, the street price of coke didn't drop a penny?! The demand is too great and the supply is too large. People already do screw up their lives with drugs, and then "recover." Seems to be far to damn popular now days to be "in recovery".
To: Clock King
"How many people do you think have used illegal drugs?"The largest is marijuana. Here's the chart:
The only users I'm concerned about are the habitual users (past 30 days), and that's been flat for 15 years at 5%, and down significantly since 1979.
One more for comparison, cocaine, the #2 illegal drug:
Habitual users (past 30 days) is 0.7%, down from 3.0% in 1985. Hallucinogens at #3 add another 0.6%. These are not big numbers.
But that's not my point. My point is that drug users do not "suffer the consequences" today, nor will they if drugs are legalized. Drug users cost me money for everything from their hospitalization costs to court-appointed rehab. From stealing to feed a habit, to lost productivity and accidents on the job.
We live in a cradle-to-grave nanny state. Legalization would just add to the existing burden.
Now, if we first get rid of the nanny state today, then the author might have a point when saying that drug users would "suffer the consequences". But we haven't and he can't.
To: Bob J
Still missing the absolutely necessary parallel wherein the exact same bake sale for the exact same reasons with very similar prices was allowed in a protest against "The Man".
It was a California someone have the link?
16
posted on
10/06/2003 3:04:41 PM PDT
by
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
To: jmc813
"Read JDM". He has a website at www.readjdm.com.
17
posted on
10/06/2003 7:11:55 PM PDT
by
Bob J
To: FreedomPoster
I'm just the editor! Personally, I swing both ways on the WOD, I'm not advocating a position here. JDM wrote a good article so we posted it the Free Republic Network website! If someone submits a good counter argument, I'll post that also.
18
posted on
10/06/2003 7:13:52 PM PDT
by
Bob J
To: robertpaulsen
Drug users cost me money for everything from their hospitalizationSo do overeaters---going after them next?
19
posted on
10/07/2003 6:13:09 AM PDT
by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
To: robertpaulsen
Drug users cost me money for everything I would argue that drug users SAVE you money since they tend to die sooner and don't burden the country with medicare, social security, etc. in their old age.
20
posted on
10/07/2003 6:18:11 AM PDT
by
twittle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson