Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China developing `paralysis warfare'
Taipei Times ^ | 10.08.03 | Brian Hsu

Posted on 10/08/2003 11:43:19 AM PDT by Dr. Marten

China developing `paralysis warfare'By Brian Hsu
STAFF REPORTER
Wednesday, Oct 08, 2003,Page 1

China's military is changing its strategy from deterrence to pre-emption, planning to use "paralysis warfare" against Taiwan in the future, the Ministry of National Defense said in a report delivered to the legislature's defense committee yesterday.

"Paralysis warfare features Web-based information warfare, saturation ballistic missile attacks, joint precision strikes and seizure of the enemy's capital city by special operations units," the report says.

"Such tactics will become a major option for the Chinese military in its choice of modes of attack against Taiwan in the future," it says. "They emphasize shock and awe effects against the enemy."

The report, which was delivered to lawmakers on the defense committee yesterday, singles out paralysis warfare as the most likely mode of attack that China would use against Taiwan.

Minister of National Defense Tang Yao-ming will make the same points in an address to the defense committee today.

The report says the number of short-range ballistic missiles that China has in its inventory has reached 500. It does not state that these missiles are aimed at Taiwan, but it is believed that Taiwan would be the target.

The report also confirms that China has established a second airborne corps to increase its troops ready for use against Taiwan.

The new airborne corps has been the subject of media speculation in recent months, but had not been confirmed by the ministry until now.

The ministry believes China's military is seeking to acquire the ability of rapid and long-distance deployment of forces.

To counter the new threats, the ministry says it is speeding up the development of high-tech weapons.

The new weapons are focused on electronic warfare. They also include the development of miniaturized weapons on the basis of nanotechnology and superconductors.

It is the first time that the ministry has made public its development of miniaturized weapons.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Japan; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: armsrace; asiasinouswatch; carbonnanotubetech; china; chinastuff; clashofcivilizatio; fareast; geopolitics; miltech; superweapons; taiwan; zanupf

1 posted on 10/08/2003 11:43:19 AM PDT by Dr. Marten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
Shock and Awe II
2 posted on 10/08/2003 11:44:59 AM PDT by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
Jade Fox already used paralysis in Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon.
3 posted on 10/08/2003 11:45:09 AM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
"Please contribute to FreeRepublic and make these posts go away"


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!
Thanks Registered

4 posted on 10/08/2003 11:46:27 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
Ultimately it will be hard to defend Taiwan as close as it is to China. There is a much better road to travel.

The chicoms could be made to answer this question: Are you claiming to own an island, or are you claiming to own the 25 million people who moved to Taiwan precisely because they did not wish to live under communist rule? The US should have a plan to move the entire population of Taiwan to some other island or US territory, several thousand miles from China. The Taiwanese would be back in business as usual within a year, and the chicoms would be DIH. Peter Schulz of Porsche once stated that the physical plant of Porsche could be burnt or bombed to dust and, if only his people survived with their skills, they'd be back building cars within a year and a half. The kinds of stuff the Taiwanese typically make, electronics and what not, cannot possibly require any more overhead than building sports cars.

5 posted on 10/08/2003 11:51:13 AM PDT by judywillow (the supposed Kr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
The free people of Taiwan thank you Bill Clinton, Prescott Bush, Richard Nixon, and Henry Kissenger.
6 posted on 10/08/2003 11:51:23 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
""Paralysis warfare features Web-based information warfare, saturation ballistic missile attacks, joint precision strikes and seizure of the enemy's capital city by special operations units," the report says."

Well, if the ballistic missiles doesn't get em to surrender, the endless banner ads sure will.
7 posted on 10/08/2003 11:52:19 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
We'd better be ready to fight these Chinese.
8 posted on 10/08/2003 11:53:25 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: judywillow
Two words for you: TSMC and UMC. Those two companies fabricate a large percentage of the silicon parts used today. If those two companies go off-line due to Chinese invasion I believe the impact on the world economy would be extreme. Furthermore, it takes a whole lot more equipment and technology to build a wafer fab than it does to build a factory for building cars. The modern day wafer fab is a multi-billion dollar investment.
9 posted on 10/08/2003 11:55:40 AM PDT by Elliott Jackalope (We send our kids to Iraq to fight for them, and they send our jobs to India. Now THAT'S gratitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
"Paralysis" strategy sounds a lot like the old German Blitzkreig.
10 posted on 10/08/2003 11:58:59 AM PDT by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elliott Jackalope
Rebuilding a wafer fab can't possibly cost more than fighting an all-out war over Taiwan.
11 posted on 10/08/2003 12:00:03 PM PDT by judywillow (the supposed Kr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
China Waging War on Space-Based Weapons***The PLA also is experimenting with other types of satellite killers: land-based, directed-energy weapons and "micro-satellites" (search) that can be used as kinetic energy weapons. According to the latest (July 2003) assessment by the U.S. Defense Department, China will probably be able to field a direct-ascent anti-satellite system (search) in the next two to six years.

Such weapons would directly threaten what many believe would be America's best form of ballistic-missile defense: a system of space-based surveillance and tracking sensors, connected with land-based sensors and space-based missile interceptors. Such a system could negate any Chinese missile attack on the U.S. homeland.

China may be a long way from contemplating a ballistic missile attack on the U.S. homeland. But deployment of American space-based interceptors also would negate the missiles China is refitting to threaten Taiwan and U.S. bases in Okinawa and Guam. And there's the rub, as far as the PLA is concerned.

Clearly, Beijing's draft treaty to ban deployment of space-based weapons is merely a delaying tactic aimed at hampering American progress on ballistic-missile defense while its own scientists develop effective countermeasures.

What Beijing hopes to gain from this approach is the ability to disrupt American battlefield awareness--and its command and control operations--and to deny the U.S. access to the waters around China and Taiwan should the issue of Taiwan's sovereignty lead to conflict between the two Chinas.

China's military thinkers are probably correct: The weaponization of space is inevitable. And it's abundantly clear that, draft treaties and pious rhetoric notwithstanding, they're doing everything possible to position themselves for dominance in space. That's worth keeping in mind the next time they exhort "peace-loving nations" to stay grounded.***

China's PLA Sees Value in Pre-emptive Strike Strategy [Full Text] WASHINGTON, Aug. 11, 2003 - The military strategy of "shock and awe" used to stun the Iraqi military in the opening campaign of Operation Iraqi Freedom might be used by the Chinese if military force is needed to bring Taiwan back under communist control.

According to the released recently The Annual Report on the Military Power of the People's Republic of China, the country's military doctrine now stresses elements such as "surprise, deception and pre- emption." Furthermore, the report states that Beijing believes that "surprise is crucial" for the success of any military campaign.

Taiwan, located off the coast of mainland China, claimed independence from the communist country in 1949. The island has 21 million people and its own democratic government.

China, with 1.3 billion people, claims sovereignty over the tiny island, sees Taiwan as a breakaway province and has threatened to use military force against Taiwan to reunify the country. And China's force against Taiwan could come as a surprise attack.

But "China would not likely initiate any military action unless assured of a significant degree of strategic surprise," according to the report.

The report states that Lt. Gen. Zheng Shenxia, chief of staff of the People's Liberation Army's Air Force and an advocate of pre-emptive action, believes the chances of victory against Taiwan would be "limited" without adopting a pre-emptive strategy.

The report says that China now believes pre-emptive strikes are its best advantage against a technologically superior force. Capt. Shen Zhongchang from the Chinese Navy Research Institute is quoted as saying that "lighting attacks and powerful first strikes will be widely used in the future."

China's new military thinking has evolved over the past decade. PLA observers have been studying U.S. military strategies since the first Gulf War, when they noticed how quickly U.S. forces using state-of-the-art weapons defeated Iraqi forces that in some ways resemble their own.

Since then, the report states the PLA has shifted its war approach from "annihilative," where an army uses "mass and attrition" to defeat an enemy, to more "coercive warfighting strategies."

The PLA now considers "shock power" as a crucial coercion element to the opening phase of its war plans and that PLA operational doctrine is now designed to actively "take the initiative" and "catch the enemy unprepared."

"With no apparent political prohibitions against pre- emption, the PLA requires shock as a force multiplier to catch Taiwan or another potential adversary, such as the United States, unprepared," the report states.

Ways the PLA would catch Taiwan and the U.S. off guard include strategic and operational deception, electronic warfare and wearing down or desensitizing the opponent's political and military leadership. Another objective would be to reduce any indication or warning of impending military action, the report states.

Preparing for a possible conflict with Taiwan and deterring the United States from intervening on Taiwan's behalf is the "primary driver" of China's military overhaul, according to this year's report. Over the course of the next decade the country will spend billions to counter U.S. advances in warfare technology, the report states. [End]

12 posted on 10/08/2003 12:01:08 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
Yesterday, Chen was asserting that Taiwan is NOT a part of China.
13 posted on 10/08/2003 12:01:48 PM PDT by jerseygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: judywillow
Perhaps, but realize we are not talking about rebuilding a single wafer, we are talking about rebuilding multiple foundries, each major production line representing multiple billions of dollars, multipled by dozens of lines. The bigger expense is in the number of silicon parts that won't be available for the world economy. Most everything made nowadays that plugs into a wall or has a motor has silicon chips in it. The multiplier effect would be huge, to say the least.
14 posted on 10/08/2003 12:03:41 PM PDT by Elliott Jackalope (We send our kids to Iraq to fight for them, and they send our jobs to India. Now THAT'S gratitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Elliott Jackalope
"rebuilding a single wafer" s/b 'rebuilding a single wafer FAB". OOPS!
15 posted on 10/08/2003 12:04:26 PM PDT by Elliott Jackalope (We send our kids to Iraq to fight for them, and they send our jobs to India. Now THAT'S gratitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
And here was me thinking that Chinese 'paralysis warfare' involved putting extra MSG in the chow mein!
16 posted on 10/08/2003 12:07:26 PM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonQ
The following picture shows the results of an early test on an unsuspecting subject:


17 posted on 10/08/2003 12:08:01 PM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Banner Ads! Yikes! Not the ones with flashing text I hope! Oh the humanity!
18 posted on 10/08/2003 12:19:17 PM PDT by Cobra Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: DonQ
yes, with a little Sun Tsu and Boyd thown in for fun.
20 posted on 10/08/2003 12:20:55 PM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: judywillow
It would be very difficult to defend, but easy to sell nukes to. Big shiney rhinestone studded nukes.
21 posted on 10/08/2003 12:23:06 PM PDT by Cobra Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Elliott Jackalope
" .... the impact on the world economy would be extreme."

Which is exactly why the Chinese will never invade.
22 posted on 10/08/2003 12:37:41 PM PDT by mpreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mpreston
I'm inclined to agree. The only caveat is if China begins to experience extreme internal stress, and looks around for a handy whipping boy / scapegoat to attack in an attempt to relieve that stress. Said effort would probably backfire, but it would buy them some time.

Still, all in all, this strikes me as an unlikely scenario, so your assertation is most likely correct.
23 posted on 10/08/2003 12:41:39 PM PDT by Elliott Jackalope (We send our kids to Iraq to fight for them, and they send our jobs to India. Now THAT'S gratitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Elliott Jackalope
Just be sure the Taiwan gov't has PLENTY of short-range nukes for deterrence....
24 posted on 10/08/2003 7:53:06 PM PDT by hoosierham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson