Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who "Blew" Mrs. Wilson's Cover?
Human Events Online ^ | October, 10, 2003 | Herbert Romerstein

Posted on 10/11/2003 6:38:44 AM PDT by TennTuxedo

Who 'Blew' Mrs. Wilson's Cover?

by Herbert Romerstein Posted Oct 10, 2003

The liberal press and the Democrat demagogues on Capitol Hill are having a hissy fit over "who blew the cover of Joe Wilson's wife." The answer is not hard to find. The culprit was Joe Wilson IV—with some help from his wife. When Wilson wrote an op-ed in The New York Times in July and revealed that he had gone to Niger on a CIA assignment, he called attention to his wife. CIA people who are really undercover are very careful about not identifying themselves or their families with the agency. They wait until their children are old enough to keep their mouths shut before revealing, even to them, that they are CIA officers. Wilson listed his wife's maiden name in the biography he put on the web site of the Middle East Institute.

When a CIA officer under deep cover is assigned to a hostile country, he knows that the enemy counter-intelligence service will do a background check. Any involvement of a relative with the CIA will endanger the officer's cover. Mrs. Joe Wilson also helped shred her cover when she made a contribution to the Al Gore for President campaign and listed her cover company in the Federal Election Commission filing. If she were ever posted overseas under cover, that would provide the hostiles with a lead to unravel her CIA connection.

The hysterical demagogues are demanding that any administration officials who revealed to columnist Robert Novak that she was a CIA officer be prosecuted under the 1982 Protection of Identities Act. If the names are ever learned, however, it is doubtful that they could be prosecuted. First of all, the liberal Democrats and their ACLU allies made sure in 1982 that only a limited number of CIA officers would be protected by the act. Only those who were "serving outside the United States or (have) within the last five years served outside the United States" are covered. Mrs. Wilson's work appears to be as a CIA analyst at headquarters. There are many such people in CIA, and they are not protected by the law.

Many of the same Democrats who are screaming about this case said nothing when one of their colleagues actually identified a covert CIA agent in a dangerous country. In 1995, then Democratic Congressman, later Senator, Robert Torricelli identified a military officer in Guatemala as a CIA asset. The colonel was helping CIA with information about terrorists and drug dealers that his government had collected. Torricelli alleged that the CIA agent was involved in two murders, one of a U.S. citizen and the other of a Guatemalan, supposedly married to an American. The charges were false. President Clinton ordered the Intelligence Oversight Board to investigate the allegations. The board found that the sources used by Torricelli were "unreliable and...contradicted by other evidence..." The supposed Guatemalan murder victim was Efrain Bamaca Velasquez, a leader of a terrorist group called the Guatemalan National Revolutionary Unity. Bamaca was either killed in combat or died after capture by a military unit. His organization was established in 1980 when the Cuban Intelligence Service, the DGI, ordered three small terrorist groups to unite in order to receive arms and training from the Castro dictatorship. The main activity of the Guatemalan terrorists was murders and kidnappings. In 1968 they murdered John D. Webber, chief of the U.S. military mission, and U.S. Ambassador John Gordon Mein in separate kidnapping attempts. They continued the kidnappings and murders with Cuban help after they were united.

Although Torricelli's charges against the Guatemalan colonel were false, he did tell the truth that the man was helping the CIA. Torricelli succeeded in causing the United States to lose a valuable source in the fight against Communist terrorism. The Janet Reno Justice Department had no interest in prosecuting Torricelli under the "Protection of Identities Act." Instead the case was turned over to the House Ethics Committee where the offending liberal Democrat congressman was slapped on the wrist and told not to do it again.

No one should identify covert CIA officers or their agents. Even though Joe Wilson IV and his wife showed such a cavalier attitude toward her cover, it was wrong to identify her. We have few enough intelligence sources as a result of the Clinton Administration's emasculation of our foreign intelligence services. This was shown when the only way that the CIA could learn if Iraq had attempted to get uranium in Niger was to send Wilson to that country where, as he told The New York Times, "I spent the next eight days drinking sweet mint tea and meeting with dozens of people...." By writing his article, Wilson exposed an important CIA weakness: They did not have the sources in Niger that could supply the information. We can blame that on the eight dark years of Bill Clinton.

While Wilson's report is being used by the liberal Democrats to undermine President Bush's charge that Iraq had tried to buy uranium in Africa, Wilson actually confirmed the Iraqi attempt, but his friends merely told him that it didn't succeed. That is what British intelligence reported and President Bush repeated in his State of the Union Address.

The Wilson case does raise another question: What fool at CIA sent a liberal Democrat Bush-basher on such an assignment? Wilson had made his bias against the President known. As a reward for his smearing of the President, Wilson is scheduled to receive the Ron Ridenhour Award on October 15. The award is given by the Nation Institute, which publishes The Nation magazine, one of the few publications of the loony left that continues after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Mr. Romerstein served for many years as a congressional investigator and as head of the Office of Counter Soviet Disinformation at the United States Information Agency. He is the author with the late Eric Breindel of The Venona Secrets, Exposing Soviet Espionage and America's Traitors (Regnery)


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cia; cialeak; democrats; dirtypolitics; joewilson; leak; plamenameblamegame; redherrings; roguesincia; valerieplame; yellowcake
Joe Wilson outed his own wife. George Tenet is ultimately responsible for allowing Wilson to get the assignment.
1 posted on 10/11/2003 6:38:44 AM PDT by TennTuxedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

 

Keep Our Republic Free

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER
and say THANKS to Jim Robinson!
IT'S IN THE BREAKING NEWS SIDEBAR
THANKS!


2 posted on 10/11/2003 6:39:55 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo
Anybody try a historical reference to Mrs. Wilson's "cover" at the CIA prior to the year 1999? You might be surprised.
3 posted on 10/11/2003 7:42:33 AM PDT by PokeyJoe (Don't talk about my armchair unless you know how to pull the recliner lever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo
The liberal media probably did more damage (if there really is any) by blasting her name and the issue all over the front pages of their yellow rags for as long as they did.
4 posted on 10/11/2003 7:51:21 AM PDT by SpinyNorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo
The liberal media probably did more damage (if there really is any) by blasting her name and the issue all over the front pages of their yellow rags for as long as they did.
5 posted on 10/11/2003 7:52:12 AM PDT by SpinyNorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo
The Wilson case does raise another question: What fool at CIA sent a liberal Democrat Bush-basher on such an assignment? Wilson had made his bias against the President known. As a reward for his smearing of the President, Wilson is scheduled to receive the Ron Ridenhour Award on October 15. The award is given by the Nation Institute, which publishes The Nation magazine, one of the few publications of the loony left that continues after the collapse of the Soviet Union

This is the real scandal!

6 posted on 10/11/2003 8:01:14 AM PDT by GWB00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GWB00
Wilson's WIFE sent ole Joe
7 posted on 10/11/2003 8:07:28 AM PDT by cars for sale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo
Sending Wilson to Niger to drink tea for nine days tells me everything I need to know about the current state of the US intelligence apparatus.
8 posted on 10/11/2003 8:11:25 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo
Wilson listed his wife's maiden name in the biography he put on the web site of the Middle East Institute.

The wife used her married name in a 1999 contribution to Kerry, she also listed her supposed CIA cover company as her place of employment. All such contributions are posted on the Internet for the world to access.

9 posted on 10/11/2003 10:47:26 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (No Taxation Without Respiration - Repeal Death Taxes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
Anybody try a historical reference to Mrs. Wilson's "cover" at the CIA prior to the year 1999? You might be surprised.

How so? The "company" she worked for, "Brewster-Jennings and Associates" apparently didn't exist, although I have seen bloggers claim that it shows up on Dunn & Bradstreet. Which I can access but would need to do from my office.

10 posted on 10/11/2003 11:03:35 AM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
How so? The "company" she worked for, "Brewster-Jennings and Associates" apparently didn't exist, although I have seen bloggers claim that it shows up on Dunn & Bradstreet. Which I can access but would need to do from my office.

That wouldn't necessarily help. There may be a current D&B record for the company, and D&B carries a year started field. However, that field is derived from a survey the company fills out, and could easily be bogus. The only way to be sure would be to get some old pre-1999 D&B data and see if the company is present in that data - something probably impossible to do, as about the only place the old data would be present would be on an old tape that someone had never scratched or thrown out, or on an old Imarket CD or Million Dollar Disk CD that is still lying around.

11 posted on 10/11/2003 11:16:25 AM PDT by dirtboy (Cure Arnold of groping - throw him into a dark closet with Janet Reno and shut the door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
I read that initially the donation to Kerry's campaign was $2,000 and since the legal personal limit is $1,000 Wilson put half of it in his wife's maiden name. She supposedly didn't know he did this. Nice marriage, eh?
12 posted on 10/11/2003 11:19:18 AM PDT by arasina (I gave a monetary contribution to FreeRepublic because it's my lifeline to the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
If all the CIA does when setting up "front" companies is list them in Dun & Bradstreet, that's interesting.

I know it's hard to set up an actual "shell" corporation -- you can learn a LOT from corporate filings, which are public records.

It would probably be easier to set up a "shell" partnership or sole proprietorship, because those don't show up in public records, at least not here in Virginia.

But if you have a street address, then you'll need an occupancy permit. Etc.

Maybe hard to suss out from overseas, but not at all hard to do here, especially now with the Internet.
13 posted on 10/11/2003 11:34:24 AM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: arasina
She supposedly didn't know he did this. Nice marriage, eh?

That is even worse, Mr. Wilson is an idiot!

14 posted on 10/11/2003 11:35:21 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (No Taxation Without Respiration - Repeal Death Taxes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
If all the CIA does when setting up "front" companies is list them in Dun & Bradstreet, that's interesting.

You would need to do a lot more than that. You'd need to set up phone lines, office supply accounts and create a credit history. Open a checking account. Get a TIN number (concocted, of course). Set up your workman's comp. Etc, etc., etc. - because if you don't, some state agency may come across you and wonder what's going on.

I know it's hard to set up an actual "shell" corporation -- you can learn a LOT from corporate filings, which are public records.

You can still have those dead-end - remember, in the end, the ultimate arbiter of authenticity for identity is the SSN/TIN - and the governmen controls those systems. I imagine those systems have a backdoor for spook work.

But if you have a street address, then you'll need an occupancy permit. Etc. But if you have a street address, then you'll need an occupancy permit. Etc.

Only if you own the property. If you rent it, that's another story.

15 posted on 10/11/2003 11:39:14 AM PDT by dirtboy (Cure Arnold of groping - throw him into a dark closet with Janet Reno and shut the door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo
Who woulda guessed that hubby is the culprit? This episode like Enron and Global Crossing debacles will die a quick death.
16 posted on 10/11/2003 12:13:46 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo
When Wilson wrote an op-ed in The New York Times in July and revealed that he had gone to Niger on a CIA assignment, ...

Wilson violated Federal law by outing HIMSELF as having worked for the CIA.

17 posted on 10/11/2003 2:17:15 PM PDT by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
As for Wilson himself, he has stated that he had a business relationship either with the Rock Creek Foundation, the Rock Creek Institute or the Rock Creek Company. Take your choice. He doesn't seem to have really worked with any of the three.
18 posted on 10/11/2003 3:24:12 PM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo
When the TRUTH comes out, this family will look more like the ROSENBERG-Wilsons.
19 posted on 10/11/2003 3:46:08 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
THE question is still....WHO sent Mr. Rosenberg-Wilson to NIGER??

Memo To George W. Bush: George Tenet is your WEAKEST LINK.

20 posted on 10/11/2003 3:50:43 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
It's the Rock Creek Corporation, and Wilson is the "strategic advisor," whatever that is, according to his own CV.
http://www.mepc.org/public_asp/forums_chcs/archive.asp

My guess is that Rock Creek Corporation is incorporated in DC, because it is based in DC. I've already checked Maryland and Virginia, and it's not incorporated in either of those.

I can't figure out how to access DC corporate information online - last time I wanted to get DC corporate information I had to drive into DC, but the corporate information office is cooperative and well organized.
21 posted on 10/11/2003 4:35:13 PM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
"They wait until their children are old enough to keep their mouths shut before revealing, even to them, that they are CIA officers."

This is very true I know two children of CIA operatives and they get well taken care of even as adults!

22 posted on 10/11/2003 11:26:23 PM PDT by Kay Soze (Democrats’ life philosophy is so flawed they need my money to make their lives work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
"My guess is that Rock Creek Corporation is incorporated in DC, because it is based in DC. I've already checked Maryland and Virginia, and it's not incorporated in either of those."

From what I know, the Rock Creek Corporation is headquartered in DC and Wilson's "private" consulting office also happens to be headquartered in their office space. It has been hard for me to find out much about Rock Creek, other than that it does a lot of business with Saudis and doesn't have a website, such as other well-known corporations such as Halliburton. Maybe it's a CIA front, but probably not.

23 posted on 07/17/2004 12:36:23 AM PDT by Valentine_W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson