Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The media get recalled
townhall.com ^ | October 12, 2003 | Brent Bozell

Posted on 10/11/2003 11:15:27 PM PDT by Kay Soze

The media get recalled

Arnold Schwarzenegger won, and Gray Davis lost, as did Cruz Bustamante, as did Arianna Huffington. But no one was more rejected in this 61 percent Republican tidal wave in an overwhelming Democratic state than the liberal press. Consider the media recalled.

From the first signatures on recall petitions, the press was huffing and puffing with hysteria. Newsweek said the state "was in thrall to an earnest crank ... in the grip of what can only be described as a civic crackup." The New York Times called it a "throbbing political hangover." Peter Jennings warned, "The recall is on the verge of unleashing a political tempest. Some in California would say political madness."

When it was over, the press was still howling "Foul!" Remember how, after the GOP landslide in 1994, Jennings compared the public to 2-year-olds and complained "the voters had a temper tantrum last week"? There must be something in the drinking water at ABC. On the morning of the Schwarzenegger victory, there was his colleague Linda Douglass claiming (with no evidence provided) that "Schwarzenegger acknowledged that the recall campaign was the result of a statewide temper tantrum."

Of course, voters were upset, but national reporters didn’t dare tread near what might be causing this troublesome discontent: skyrocketing spending, tripled car taxes, slipping bond ratings, overpaid public-employee unions. Once the movie star entered the race, all the spotlights -- and all the nit-picking scrutiny -- were directed at him.

It didn’t matter that the people felt very obviously that Gov. Gray Davis was an incompetent in need of sudden retirement. It didn’t matter that the lieutenant governor who aspired to replace him had ties to a bizarre group believing several southwestern states should be sawed off America and handed back to the Mexicans. It didn’t matter than Gov. Davis tried to save himself by signing a bill to award illegal aliens state-sanctioned driver’s licenses, making it easier for homeland-security threats to move right into the mainstream of California -- and perhaps other states as well.

What mattered were mangled statements Arnold supposedly made in 1975 during the filming of his breakthrough documentary "Pumping Iron." What mattered were wild claims about group sex at the gym that Arnold made in the pornographic magazine Oui in 1977. What mattered was an anonymous female, "a former pro beach volleyball player," who claimed that Arnold touched her breast on a Santa Monica street in 1980. No longer were we being admonished by the press to "move on." Now, they were instructing the voters to back up.

The media labored hard against the recall. First, it was a "circus," a freak show for pornographers, porn actresses, disgruntled child stars and thong-underwear-selling self-promoters. Then, it was Arnold, obviously too stupid even to form complete sentences in a debate. Then, it was so unfair that a dedicated longtime public servant should be overturned by an actor with zero administrative experience, as if Davis’ experience ruining the state wasn’t the issue.

When these lines didn’t work, it was the media -- not just Democratic partisans but the media -- who reached into the ugly bag and started throwing unsubstantiated rumors and groping stories. The Los Angeles Times, which dismissed last-minute entreaties in 1992 to bring Juanita Broaddrick’s rape story to public scrutiny as "toxic waste," spent weeks goading women into telling anonymous tales about a comparatively meaningless boob squeeze in the 1970s. Tom Brokaw, who couldn’t bear to touch Broaddrick’s rape story with a 10-foot pole, even as it aired on his own network, dared to lecture Arnold that his behavior "could be criminal."

The media hypocrisy is so obvious as to be transparent.

Which brings us back to ABC reporter Linda Douglass, who mangled Arnold’s alleged 1975 praise of Adolf Hitler. In 1975, he told an interviewer that he admired Hitler’s "way of getting to the people" but then added, "But I don’t admire him for what he did with it." Douglass artfully changed the quote and reported that he had said, "I admire him for being such a good public speaker and for what he did with it," which gave license to Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe and Gray Davis to spend the final weekend pretending out loud that Arnold had swastikas tattooed on his biceps. When Arnold protested the story to Peter Jennings, the anchorman replied, "But you had to know that this was all going to come out in a campaign. It is, after all, your past -- it isn't made up, is it?" In fact, ABC was making stuff up.

It’s obvious that Schwarzenegger, with his libertine movie-star misbehavior and social positions, not to mention his utter lack of political finesse in his pre-candidate days, was not the ideal conservative role model. But in the end, California voters just told the media to take their bias and shove it.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: backfire; brentbozell; california; califrecall; graydavis; latimes; mediabias; mediarecall; recallanalysis; revall; schwarzenegger
FYI-

-The upper 1% of wage earners pay 37.4% of all taxes and account for only 20.8% of all income in the US

-The top 10% of wage earners pay 67% while earning only 46%

-The lowest 50% of wage earners paid only 4% pay while earning 14% of total income

[ Stock bubble burst severely reduced tax revenues because the tax base is too heavily dependent on the rich as they pay almost twice their share. ]

1 posted on 10/11/2003 11:15:27 PM PDT by Kay Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Have YOU Donated Yet??

PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 10/11/2003 11:16:48 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
Wow. Game, set, match.
3 posted on 10/11/2003 11:30:55 PM PDT by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
Great article -- the elite media and the DNC still don't understand things are different since 9/11. We now have the internet and - thank goodness, FreeRepublic - to expose their lies and dirty tricks. With that thought in mind, if you haven't donated to FreeRepublic yet or better still, become a monthly contributer, I urge you to do so. Only the truth will stamp out the RATS and liars.
4 posted on 10/12/2003 3:38:39 AM PDT by Elkiejg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
Lying media bump.
5 posted on 10/12/2003 8:17:10 AM PDT by Eala (If used-car salesmen misrepresented cars the way the press does truth, they'd be jailed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
Ah the media. Just like all once great but now gone empires - elitists will never realize the truth of their situation, because they have excluded those who would be honest with them, and secluded themselves from reality.

The media won't get it until it is too late to affect the outcome but they won't go quietly. There is one thing elitists with power can't handle, something that leads them to lie, cheat and steal if neccessary - that my friends, is irrelevance.


For the last 10 years they enjoyed shaping, controlling, and generating the news they wanted us to hear or see. They began at first, quite innocently rubbing elbows with politicians, attending parties rather than covering parties. They started to marry and date politicians. Instead of the bridge between the news consumers and the news makers, they became the news makers.

But alas, Fox News, the Internet, Rush Limbaugh, etc built a new bridge. Of course the media is upset, they have lost their power. They are irrelevent.
6 posted on 10/12/2003 8:42:51 AM PDT by ODDITHER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson