Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(California) Recall a measure of voters' fears and discontent (Warning: Dan Rather)
Houston Chronicle ^ | Oct. 11, 2003, 7:26PM | By DAN RATHER

Posted on 10/12/2003 1:07:15 PM PDT by weegee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 10/12/2003 1:07:16 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: weegee
Schwarzenegger, a political novice and outsider

This, from a moron who would vote for Hillary or Wesley Clark.

2 posted on 10/12/2003 1:10:14 PM PDT by Paul Atreides (Bringing you quality, non-unnecessarily-excerpted threads since 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I would like to take a moment to ask for donations.

It should be clear to all conservatives by now that the left intends to demonize us. They don't just disagree with us, they hate us. And worse, they want to get other people to hate us.

Places like Free Republic drive the left batty.

Please donate. Thanks for your consideration.

3 posted on 10/12/2003 1:10:16 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Does a Schwarzenegger victory signal the arrival of an era in which actors can run on their on-screen persona rather than on their "real" lives?

Where was Dan, during the Clinton years?

4 posted on 10/12/2003 1:11:49 PM PDT by Paul Atreides (Bringing you quality, non-unnecessarily-excerpted threads since 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Let them go along deluding themselves that it was not their polices and beliefs that failed, it's only good for un in the long run.
5 posted on 10/12/2003 1:12:22 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Spewing the DNC talking points....how unexpected!(/sarcasm)
6 posted on 10/12/2003 1:14:51 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
LOL! According to Dan and his ilk, anytime a liberal is defeated, it is because of irrational emotions on the part of the rabble. We are all throwing tantrums.
7 posted on 10/12/2003 1:14:55 PM PDT by Paul Atreides (Bringing you quality, non-unnecessarily-excerpted threads since 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: weegee
I always skip Dan Rather-biased's column. It's Rather annoying.
8 posted on 10/12/2003 1:17:14 PM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
Well, Dan learns the script better than could any actor.
9 posted on 10/12/2003 1:17:22 PM PDT by Paul Atreides (Bringing you quality, non-unnecessarily-excerpted threads since 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: weegee
In related news, dan rather has been obtaining oxy-moron-cotton through his hairdresser. Tom Daschle is deeply saddened. Film at 11:00.

FMCDH

10 posted on 10/12/2003 1:30:45 PM PDT by nothingnew (The pendulum is swinging and the Rats are in the pit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
[Doing my best Natalie Maines impersonation]:

Just so you'll know, I am ashamed
that Dan Rather is from Texas !



11 posted on 10/12/2003 1:32:03 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Rather refuses to face the fact that Davis was a really, really, really bad governor, and corrupt to the bone. Too bad there aren't recalls for really, really, really bad anchormen whose politics are corrupt to the bone.
12 posted on 10/12/2003 2:09:17 PM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Rather never fails to disappoint. He always misses the point.
13 posted on 10/12/2003 2:11:45 PM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Does a Schwarzenegger victory signal the arrival of an era in which actors can run on their on-screen persona rather than on their "real" lives?

Career politicians have the same advantage Schwarzenegger had--celebrity, money and name recognition. Rather's point could apply just as readily to _________ Kennedy, Hillary!, etc., ad nauseum.

14 posted on 10/12/2003 2:28:08 PM PDT by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
It might be that lessons are best drawn from Gov. Gray Davis' side of the ballot. In terms of the recall issue, two themes were hammered home again and again: desire for change and economic discontent.

According to exit polls, many who voted for Schwarzenegger did so despite doubts about their chosen candidate. But of one thing they were certain: He was not Davis.

There are many who said much the same thing about replacing George H. W. Bush with Bill Clinton. But, does anybody believe for an instant that Rather would have characterized that as resulting from voters' "fears and discontent"? Not a chance - in that event, in the eyes of rather biased propagandists such as Rather, the voters were undoubtedly voting for Clinton with their hopes for a better future. You know, all of that "man from Hope" garbage...

Is it even possible that millions of Schwarzenegger voters filled out their ballots in a gesture of hope for the future? Not in Rather's twisted mind...

15 posted on 10/12/2003 2:33:00 PM PDT by The Electrician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
"I think you can be an honest person and lie about any number of things."

“I have nothing original or profound to say.”


16 posted on 10/12/2003 3:11:34 PM PDT by Savage Beast (Has the Fall of California been averted--or merely postponed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
I think Democrats are terrified, they see this as another event in a shift towards Republicans.

If they couldn't even maintain their power in libeal California, they know they are in trouble.
17 posted on 10/12/2003 3:36:38 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: weegee
T'was...

'JOIN ARNOLD = STOP HILLARY'

http://www.TheAlamoFILM.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=28992
18 posted on 10/12/2003 3:37:03 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Where was Dan, during the Clinton years?


19 posted on 10/12/2003 4:16:38 PM PDT by geedee (Why isn't there more female politicians? It's too much trouble to put makeup on two faces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: weegee
It's hard to pick the most ridiculous statement in this article, but I nominate this one:

According to exit polls, many who voted for Schwarzenegger did so despite doubts about their chosen candidate. But of one thing they were certain: He was not Davis.

There were 135 candidates on the ballot who weren't Davis. Including Bustamante, McClintock, Riordan, etc. And Arnold got nearly 50% of the vote. (Although it could be argued that the difference between Davis and Bustamente is a whisker.)

20 posted on 10/12/2003 6:33:43 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson