1 posted on
11/11/2003 9:29:20 PM PST by
yonif
To: yonif
They are beginning to realize that the Catholics who matter are those who do more than check "Catholic" on forms?
2 posted on
11/11/2003 9:39:45 PM PST by
RobbyS
(XP)
To: yonif
Hopefully they can be nudged even more.
4 posted on
11/11/2003 9:59:14 PM PST by
tiki
To: yonif
"Catholic Bishops Eye Possible Crackdown of Pro-Abortion Pols"
Then, little hearts all a flutter and panties in a wad, they hike up their skirts and stampede shrieking for the nearest bathhouse to put such horrifying thoughts behind them.
5 posted on
11/11/2003 11:16:57 PM PST by
dsc
To: yonif; .45MAN; AAABEST; AKA Elena; al_c; american colleen; Angelus Errare; Antoninus; ...
|
|
|
Catholic Politician Abortion Voting Records 1995 -2003 |
Catholic U.S. Senator Abortion Voting Records 1995 -2003
4/17/03 : Govs. being updated. If you have voting records or other pertinent documentation please forward to us.
|
|
6 posted on
11/11/2003 11:43:15 PM PST by
ckca
To: yonif
This has potential or might backfire in NY against Schumer. We'll see with his opposition.
7 posted on
11/12/2003 12:08:46 AM PST by
neverdem
(Say a prayer for New York both for it's lefty statism and the probability the city will be hit again)
To: yonif
I would love to see this to fruition. I think the Church's latest "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore" conservative push is very refreshing, and good for business to boot.
9 posted on
11/12/2003 3:38:31 AM PST by
AAABEST
To: yonif
Excommunicating public officials is a bad idea that will eventually backfire. More than 40 years ago JFK had to campaign hard to overcome the public fear that a Catholic president would be taking orders from the Pope - at the time, the Catholic establishment in the US kept mum or actually corroborated JFK's statements that bishops wouldn't be bossing him around.
But now the Catholic establishment wants the opposite, presumably just with regard to abortion, but maybe the next step is to excommunicate public officials if they don't support public funds for parochial schools, or some other important issue (I am old enough to remember a time when doctors were legally forbidden to discuss even ordinary birth control with their patients). And they make this proposal publicly. And non-Catholics will have justification to pause at the voting booth and ask themselves if they dare to vote for a Catholic candidate who is being openly bullied to follow his Church's agenda instead of the interests and desires of the taxpayers who voted for him and pay his salary.
10 posted on
11/12/2003 4:24:47 AM PST by
DonQ
To: yonif
Dallas, Texas, Bishop Joseph Galante was selected to head the panel.A wise choice!
It's about time they heard our pleas. I'm looking forward to the outcome of this committee.
14 posted on
11/12/2003 5:39:45 AM PST by
al_c
To: yonif
I was wondering when this would hit the media. Took one whole day. LOL!
20 posted on
11/12/2003 8:48:48 AM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: yonif
bump for later
To: yonif
Judie Brown bump
(But little confidence in this "Bishops' committee")
45 posted on
11/12/2003 4:18:56 PM PST by
Dajjal
To: yonif
46 posted on
11/12/2003 10:38:44 PM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: yonif
47 posted on
11/25/2003 7:04:21 PM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson