You're asking the wrong person that question, my friend. I started with a simple comment basically about how we basically have a limited understanding of God in this physical universe and won't know in full until glory. (Given your tagline, I think you would at least agree with that general principle.) It's easy enough to see where the mudslinging came from.
The Reformation took place without the help of Arminianism and when she finally did enter the church, she did so as a troubler
I understand your point. Please understand I am not an Arminian apologist. In fact, the five-sentence TULIP synopsis is on its face reasonable to me. But of course, Calvinism is much more detailed than that. And since Calvinist adherents themselves disagree about the details of their own doctrine I don't mind identifying myself as "in continual education, continually awestruck."
Again my issue is with attitude not content. I have seen equally objectionable posturing from non-Calvinists as well.
woody....cmon - pot...kettle....black
how was the mother of all calvinist holidays at the clear channel woody house?