Skip to comments.
Do the Fathers Support
Scott Hahn’s Theory?
The Remnant Newspaper ^
| Robert Sungenis
Posted on 11/14/2004 9:30:36 AM PST by Land of the Irish
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: Akron Al; Alberta's Child; Andrew65; AniGrrl; apologia_pro_vita_sua; attagirl; BearWash; ...
To: Land of the Irish
Where does Hahn claim this?
To: nickcarraway
To: Land of the Irish
He sounds like a quack to me.
5
posted on
11/14/2004 9:52:43 AM PST
by
newzjunkey
(San Diego, Kleptocrasy by the Sea. -- VOID the Illegal Mayoral "Election")
To: newzjunkey
He sounds like a quack to me.He is; and he's deceiving many people.
To: Land of the Irish
This fellow Hahn cannot be taken seriously. This has never been believed by the Church at any time, anywhere. Sounds like something off the ECUSA's Women's page.
7
posted on
11/14/2004 9:59:58 AM PST
by
Kolokotronis
(Nuke the Cube!)
To: Land of the Irish
Robert Sungenis is a total quack. He supports the theory of Geocentrism and challenges anyone to prove that the Earth revolves around the sun - he is even offering a cash prize for this. Many in the apologetics movement have talked to Robert to try to bring his out of this wackiness - but so far he just goes into it further.
Robert Sungenis has written some useful things in the past but his organization CAI just went off the deep end.
8
posted on
11/14/2004 11:05:14 AM PST
by
Atheist2Theist
(http://www.splendoroftruth.com/curtjester/)
To: Atheist2Theist
Robert Sungenis is a total quack. He supports the theory of Geocentrism and challenges anyone to prove that the Earth revolves around the sun - he is even offering a cash prize for this.If he's wrong, why haven't you, or anyone else, collected the prize.
To: Land of the Irish; Atheist2Theist
How did he come to the conclusion that the Sun must go around the Earth? Do you believe in this theory, LOTI?
10
posted on
11/14/2004 11:31:46 AM PST
by
Pyro7480
(Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
To: Pyro7480
How did he come to the conclusion that the Sun must go around the Earth?
Who cares? The Pope has said that the theory that people evolved from lizards is more than a theory. Geocentrism doesn't condradict sacred scripture. If Sungenis is considered a quack for believing in geocentrism, then what does that make the pope?
To: Pyro7480
Let me know when you collect the prize.
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: Land of the Irish
No created analogy can exit between the
Uncreated and the created. It always breaks down. This projection of feminist ideas is deplorable. It always sends red flags up, that a teacher is going down a slippery slope when traditional thought about God is abandoned. Hahn says some good things, but he is sloppy in his scholarship. His books while somewhat helpful, reflect his pre"catholic" Presbyterian theology.
14
posted on
11/14/2004 12:08:02 PM PST
by
pachomi33
(Lord have mercy)
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: Land of the Irish
16
posted on
11/14/2004 12:41:26 PM PST
by
Atheist2Theist
(http://www.splendoroftruth.com/curtjester/)
To: Marcellinus; Grey Ghost II
"Could you please give a reference for your statement that "the Pope has said that the theory that people evolved from lizards is more than a theory"."
The comment was made in the Holy Fathers October 1996 message to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences on Evolution theory.
There is an article about it here which appeared in Homiletic & Pastoral Review:
http://www.theotokos.org.uk/pages/creation/pwilders/evolpope.html
To: Marcellinus
Could you please give a reference for your statement that "the Pope has said that the theory that people evolved from lizards is more than a theory". Pope John Paul II made a speech to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences on October 23, 1996 in which he addressed the subject of evolution:
"Today, more than a half century after this encyclical [Pius XII's 1950 encyclical Humani generis], new knowledge leads us to recognize in the theory of evolution more than a hypothesis."
To: pachomi33
"Hahn says some good things, but he is sloppy in his scholarship. His books while somewhat helpful, reflect his pre"catholic" Presbyterian theology." I think you said it very well, but I would probably substitute 'cavalier' for sloppy. Hahn is not sloppy, but calculating in supporting his pet theory(ies).
I think the 'cavalier' is a reflection of his success - too far, too fast. And, IMO, his choice of hills to die on a reflection of his own history (protestant) and his liberalism. Too much to overcome.
He will die on this hill.
19
posted on
11/14/2004 12:57:04 PM PST
by
Arguss
(Take the narrow road)
To: Land of the Irish
He is; and he's deceiving many people.Yep, add him to the list.
20
posted on
11/14/2004 1:12:37 PM PST
by
Stubborn
(It Is The Mass That Matters)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson