Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic priests demand the right to marry
SMH ^ | 26 January 2005 | Linda Morris

Posted on 01/25/2005 5:56:05 AM PST by Catholic54321

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-157 next last
Comment #81 Removed by Moderator

To: deportmichaelmoore

In fact, God gave us men a wife and the sexual desire followed. The priestly desire to offer sacrifice logically could come only after the Fall.

Welcome to FR.


82 posted on 01/25/2005 1:23:26 PM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: deportmichaelmoore

You're quite right, after all the bible is the book of the Catholic Church, not the other way around.


83 posted on 01/25/2005 1:26:20 PM PST by murphE ("I ain't no physicist, but I know what matters." - Popeye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: deportmichaelmoore

Go pass out your mimeos on a street corner. You're not going to find any buyers here.


84 posted on 01/25/2005 1:29:40 PM PST by justinmartyr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

Comment #85 Removed by Moderator

Comment #86 Removed by Moderator

Comment #87 Removed by Moderator

To: Kolokotronis; Dominick; sinkspur

Actually, word around the agora is that penance is a real possibility. As to what kind of infraction would warrant such, I don't know, I haven't been curious enough to ask. Nor have I been naughty enough to find out the hard way. And I don't know what all is entailed. But I do know that those under penance are barred from communion for the duration. So it would have to be a rather weighty matter, comparatively speaking.


88 posted on 01/25/2005 1:53:35 PM PST by monkfan (Mercy triumphs over judgement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: misterrob; murphE; sinkspur
What qualifies someone who isn't married to give advice to soneone who is? Telling people how to be better parents when they themselves know nothing of the day to day struggles of rasing a kid?

What qualifies a doctor who has never had a brain tumor to give advice to his patient who does? How can a married secular "marriage counsellor" try and help mend a marriage in trouble, when his own marriage is full of happiness? Haven't you ever given good advice to a friend even though you'd never experienced his predicament?

Its study, personal experience and prayer. Priests are not men beamed in from outer space. They grew up in familes. They had parents who they observed and learned from. They have married siblings and friends who share their experiences. They realize they may not be able to completely relate to every problem they are asked to help with, but who can?
89 posted on 01/25/2005 1:58:45 PM PST by sempertrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #90 Removed by Moderator

To: WriteOn
Clearly you're not appealing to the tradition of the Latin rite, but to rite-changers or other faiths?

Is this a point of dissent with the magisterium for you?

Celibacy is a discipline of the Latin Rite. It is not a dogma, or even a teaching. So, there is no "dissent with the magisterium" involved here.

91 posted on 01/25/2005 2:24:47 PM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: justinmartyr
Not only would it be a violation of Sacred Tradition to blot out a custom decreed for 2,000 years to be absolutely obligatory, but also one must recognize that clerical celibacy is to be seen not merely as of ecclesiastical institution, but part of what is more broadly known in Catholic moral theology as "divine positive law," initiated by Christ and His Apostles. That is, it is not merely disciplinary in nature.

Well, that's traditio.com's opinion. I've never seen any serious theologian claim that mandatory celibacy is part of divine positive law. If it were, there would be no "mitigations" possible.

92 posted on 01/25/2005 2:31:57 PM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: murphE; deportmichaelmoore
You're quite right, after all the bible is the book of the Catholic Church,

In fact, the whole concept of "Biblical Christianity" is preposterous. The Epistles were written to a Church already in existence, or to individual members thereof. They were written to Christians, whose faith could not possibly have been based on writings not yet written. Likewise the four Gospels ... the Gospel according to St. Luke and the Acts, like some of the Epistles, were addressed to an individual. The Apocalypse is comprehensible only in the context of an already existing (and sometimes thriving) Church.

93 posted on 01/25/2005 2:33:19 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: monkfan; Dominick; sinkspur

You're right. I was focusing on the three Hail Marys stuff and forgot about this. I may have been naughty enough, I suspect, but I guess the confessors took pity on me. Actually, what happens is that the penitent is told to do something, or refrain from doing something more likely, and during some period of time, he or she might be barred from communion. An instance might be when a couple is living together without being married. The priest refuses them communion, tells them that they msut come to confession and one or the other is sleeping on the couch until the wedding; in the meantime, no communion.


94 posted on 01/25/2005 2:59:26 PM PST by Kolokotronis (Nuke the Cube!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

Comment #95 Removed by Moderator

Comment #96 Removed by Moderator

To: sitetest

"In the short term, though, the number of diocesan priests will fall, as we have a big bulge of folks who are approaching retirement age (or who have even exceeded it, and have not yet retired)."

This "big bulge" you speak of seems to be a major factor which accentuates the crisis, and makes it appear worse than it really is.

There was a massive flood of men entering the seminary across the developed world following World War II and all our diocesan structures and numbers of parishes were built around these inflated numbers as though they were normal.

To some extent the decline in vocations is little more than a return to the trend prior to the war, although it is exacerbated in particularly corrupt dioceses.


97 posted on 01/25/2005 4:01:03 PM PST by Tantumergo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Probably not, but my point in posting the clip is that "serious theologians" (e.g., St. Jerome) have maintained that celibacy is of Apostolic origin.

Others, admittedly, have disputed this. But without a definitive pronouncement from a Council or the Holy See it is impossible to maintain -- as most participants in the debate nowadays do -- that the issue is merely one of discipline.


98 posted on 01/25/2005 4:10:42 PM PST by justinmartyr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; Kolokotronis; Dominick

"Wow. I didn't know that. Lay confessors."

There is precedent in the Roman rite (way, way, way back when!) for deacons hearing confessions and reconciling apostates to the Church.

There is a certain logic to it as the deacon is "the bishop's man" and as such participates in his ministry. When the deacon was given faculties by a bishop to exercise the Sacrament of Penance he was essentially reconciling the penitants to the local Church by acting as a "vicar" of the head of the local Church - i.e. the bishop.

P.S. I have no personal desire ever to be a confessor - coping with wayward deacons is bad enough as it is!!!


99 posted on 01/25/2005 4:24:47 PM PST by Tantumergo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: justinmartyr
But without a definitive pronouncement from a Council or the Holy See it is impossible to maintain -- as most participants in the debate nowadays do -- that the issue is merely one of discipline.

Of course it's one of discipline. Immutable teachings cannot be changed, nor can exceptions be made to them. Both of those things have happened to the celibacy discipline.

In addition, as traditio itself points out, the Eastern Rites have "mitigated" the practice, something which is simply not possible with divine positive law.

100 posted on 01/25/2005 4:31:47 PM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson