Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

This particular prophetic passage will be more prominent in western literary intelligentsia upon the death of HH the Pontiff. I have taken the prophetic tones of 'Olivetism' in # 9 to mean that the next Bishop of Rome will be a Jew of some degree.

I also must take this opportunity to point out my firm contestation that, St.Peter's martyrdom at Rome notwithstanding, St. Paul consecrated the Englishman St. Linus the first Bishop for the See of Rome. St. Linus reigned, according to tradition, from the Palatium Brittanicum.

What prophecies or prognostications might our fellow freepers offer for the future of this papacy ?

In any event, we hope this important article proves interesting.

1 posted on 02/25/2005 9:17:07 PM PST by Ryan Bailey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: Ryan Bailey
lemme unnerstan dis: a saint says the final pope of the Catholic Church will be Satan?
2 posted on 02/25/2005 9:24:35 PM PST by the invisib1e hand ("remember, from ashes you came, to ashes you will return.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey
But what will happen to meeeeeeeeeeee!


3 posted on 02/25/2005 9:26:06 PM PST by Enterprise (President Bush thought Wead was a friend. Turns out he was just a big fat tape worm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pascendi; thor76; Canticle_of_Deborah; Gerard.P; Land of the Irish

ping


4 posted on 02/25/2005 9:34:47 PM PST by murphE (Each of the SSPX priests seems like a single facet on the gem that is the alter Christus. -Gerard. P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey

I predict that Cardinal Secola of Italy will NOT be Pope.

The world already has a Pope Secola. ( for you all in Rio Linda, PEPSI Cola)


10 posted on 02/25/2005 10:05:39 PM PST by Lokibob (All typos and spelling errors are mine and copyrighted!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey
One could hope Malachy wasn't writing from the same ambiguous playbook of Nostradamus. If the next pope is a Benedictine though, it will definitely get interesting.

This does remind me of a car bumper sticker I saw once:

Jesus is returning!
Quick, everybody look busy!!

11 posted on 02/25/2005 10:36:39 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey

What reason is there to believe the predictions are authentic and are matched up correctly with the Popes named? Isn't it classic hubris to believe you live in the "end times"?


15 posted on 02/26/2005 12:44:19 AM PST by thoughtomator (If Islam is a religion, so is Liberal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey

How do you figure Peter the Roman will be Satan? What sort of anti-Catholic hate drives that expectation? The prophecy suggests tjust the opposite: that he will feed his flock amid many tribulations, a precise echoing of the establishment of the Papacy in the gospel of John: Peter, feed my lambs.

Separate what your source has written from what Malachy actually says:

"the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church there will reign Petrus Romanus, who will feed his flock amid many tribulations; after which the seven-hilled city will be destroyed and the dreadful Judge will judge the people. "

Now, here's what you have added to it:

"This final Pope will likely be Satan, taking the form of a man named Peter who will gain a worldwide allegiance and adoration. He will be the final antichrist which prophecy students have long foretold. If it were possible, even the very elect would be deceived. "

Will he be universally adored? ABSOLUTELY NOT! Malachy says he givern his church during a great persection!

Will he be Satan: ABSOLUTELY NOT! He will feed his flock (a Eucharistic reference) during their suffering!

Sounds like some rabid foaming at-the-mouth hate mongerer has perverted the prophecy, turning it on its head, to preach hatred.


17 posted on 02/26/2005 6:11:49 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey
Interesting.

A couple of questions, though.

First, it was my understanding Linus was from Tuscany, what source do you have to confirm Linus was British.

Second, how can you possibly read St. Malachy's actual prediction and conclude Peter the Roman will be Satan. Everything in the prophecy points in just the opposite direction.

And third, I notice from your home page you are a Mason. Just out of curiousity, what is the highest degree you have obtained.

Pax Christi.

20 posted on 02/26/2005 7:34:47 AM PST by AlguyA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey
Already posted.

Prophecy of St Malachy (with list of Popes)

22 posted on 02/26/2005 9:09:38 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey

Bump to read later.


24 posted on 02/26/2005 10:33:04 AM PST by vox_freedom (Fear no evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey
Peter the Roman will be Satan!?! Never in all my years have I heard this interpretation of Malachy's prophecies.

To be honest, I'm not so sure I buy these prophecies in the first place. That fluers de lis thing being as proof of "flower of flowers"? It just seems if you're trying to relate flowers to somebody it's actually pretty easy to do. (He liked flowers, he was buried with flowers, they named a flower after him, whatever.) Likewise with many of these others - i.e. "labor of the sun", "angelic shepherd", etc. I mean WWII and the rise of the Cold War went on during Pius XII's reign and the best he could come up with was "angelic shepherd"? I'm not buying it.

25 posted on 02/26/2005 10:34:25 AM PST by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey
Peter the Roman will be Satan!?! Never in all my years have I heard this interpretation of Malachy's prophecies.

To be honest, I'm not so sure I buy these prophecies in the first place. That fluers de lis thing being as proof of "flower of flowers"? It just seems if you're trying to relate flowers to somebody it's actually pretty easy to do. (He liked flowers, he was buried with flowers, they named a flower after him, whatever.) Likewise with many of these others - i.e. "labor of the sun", "angelic shepherd", etc. I mean WWII and the rise of the Cold War went on during Pius XII's reign and the best he could come up with was "angelic shepherd"? I'm not buying it.

26 posted on 02/26/2005 10:34:25 AM PST by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey
Peter the Roman will be Satan!?! Never in all my years have I heard this interpretation of Malachy's prophecies.

To be honest, I'm not so sure I buy these prophecies in the first place. That fluers de lis thing being as proof of "flower of flowers"? It just seems if you're trying to relate flowers to somebody it's actually pretty easy to do. (He liked flowers, he was buried with flowers, they named a flower after him, whatever.) Likewise with many of these others - i.e. "labor of the sun", "angelic shepherd", etc. I mean WWII and the rise of the Cold War went on during Pius XII's reign and the best he could come up with was "angelic shepherd"? I'm not buying it.

27 posted on 02/26/2005 10:34:26 AM PST by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey
the preservation of the proud traditions of our Anglo-American heritage and rights and equities in the New World Order.

You are a supporter of the New World Order?

31 posted on 02/26/2005 11:24:48 AM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey; thor76
There already have been four antipopes - the last four which correspond to the four apostate high priests in the Book of Macchabees. Also the Abomination of Desolation in the Holy Place as prohecied by Daniel, the dual nature of the flase invalid novus ordo mass and the false pope as specifically indicated by Pope Paul IV in 1559,

Now Alcimus has been struck dumb - Deo Gratias!!!

As for the last Pope, Peter the Roman, he is to be a true pope appointed by Sts. Peter and Paul the source cited in your post has it ABSOLUTELY WRONG!!!

33 posted on 02/26/2005 3:15:05 PM PST by Viva Christo Rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey

Bander's work on this used to be posted on the EWTN site. There is no number to correspond with the Petrus Romanus statement in the prophecy. The last number listed is that of the Glory of the Olive and Bander wrote that it is possible that that Pope is the last and the Petrus Romanus is referring to this last entry of St. Malachy. It isn't written anywhere in Bander's work which included the actual prophecy that the last Pope will be Satan.


36 posted on 02/26/2005 7:47:56 PM PST by Domestic Church (AMDG.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey

I believe that the list of popes contains an error. My theory is that John Paul I was only pope for a month, so Malachy's list didn't include him.

Consider this; the designation of John Paul II as "De Medietate Lanae" (Of the Half Moon) would make a lot of sense, since he was pope during the rise of Islamic power and conflict between Christianity (US) and Islam (Iraq/Iran). The symbol of Islam is a crescent moon.

http://news.ft.com/cms/s/5b02c77a-a431-11d9-9778-00000e2511c8.html

There is talk that the next pope could come from Africa or Latin America. FT.com article linked above says that some the papal candidates have connections to the Latin American church's utopian Marxist movement in the 70's and 80's. "De Medietate Lunae" -- (The Toil of the Sun) would be a fitting name for a pope from an equatorial region with ties to socialist/labor movements.


50 posted on 04/04/2005 11:24:41 PM PDT by Sparqi (Go ahead, fold spindle and mutilate -- see if I care!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey

I think all these pope's connections to the prophecies are too vague to be considered solid.


52 posted on 04/05/2005 12:23:06 AM PDT by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey

Well, I am impressed you used the correct terminology, that a bishop is consecrated. (a priest is ordained) Is that terminology used among episcopalians too?


53 posted on 04/05/2005 12:26:11 AM PDT by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ryan Bailey

John Paul II born on a day of the eclipse and will be buried on the day of an eclipse (April 8th). Meanwhile eathquake warnings being sounded all over the place thru the weekend. Stay tuned.


55 posted on 04/06/2005 6:46:28 PM PDT by eternity (From here to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson