Posted on 05/16/2005 12:20:15 PM PDT by marshmallow
May. 16 (CWNews.com) - Homosexual activists of the Rainbow Sash movement were denied Communion in St. Paul, Minnesota, but welcomed at the cathedral in Los Angeles, during their annual Pentecost Sunday protest.
Each year, members of the Rainbow Sash movement stage major demonstrations on Pentecost Sunday, wearing their distinctive sashes to advertise their disagreement with Church teachings regarding the morality of homosexual acts. In 2004, the group had its most noteworthy confrontation in St. Paul, where Archbishop Harry Flynn administered the Eucharist to protestors wearing their sashes, over the protests of other Catholics at the cathedral. Later, in response to a query from an American journalist, Cardinal Francis Arinze (bio - news), the prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship, said that the protestors should not have been given Communion, since they were flaunting their rejection of Church teaching.
This year, Archbishop Flynn warned activists that they could not receive Communion if they were wearing sashes. In Chicago, Cardinal Francis George issued the same warning.
But in Los Angeles, a spokesman for Cardinal Roger Mahony issued a statement saying that members of the Rainbow Sash group would be welcomed into the cathedral. The archdiocesan statement did not directly address the question of whether protestors were welcome to receive Communion while wearing their sashes. The Rainbow Sash movement announced because of the "warm welcome" they had received from Cardinal Mahony, members chose not to wear their sashes during Mass at the cathedral there.
In Minnesota, however, the protestors pressed their point, and Father Michael Sklucazek, the celebrant for the Sunday Mass, issued a warning that those wearing sashes would not be able to receive Communion. About 100 protestors came forward nonetheless, and stood silently for several minutes, their hands outstretched, before returning to their pews as Mass ended.
Catholic ping!
They didn't wear their sashes, thanks to Mahoney's "warm welcome."
No. Wonder if they wore their "fish" instead.
and the fact they call that monstrocity a "cathederal" really is a smack in the face!
"We believe in one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church..."
Well, maybe not in LA huh?! :)
Gawd. In all seriousness, Mahony actions are reprehensible.
Indeed. It's a real smack in the face. Mahony knows better too.
Looks like St. Paul did an about face:
2005:
In Minnesota, however, the protestors pressed their point, and Father Michael Sklucazek, the celebrant for the Sunday Mass, issued a warning that those wearing sashes would not be able to receive Communion. About 100 protestors came forward nonetheless, and stood silently for several minutes, their hands outstretched, before returning to their pews as Mass ended.
2004:
In St. Paul, Minn., people wearing the rainbow-colored sashes were given communion Sunday despite protests from some parishioners who kneeled in front of the altar blocking their way.
The Rev. Michael Skluzacek said in a written statement that both sides were mistakenly using the Mass and the Eucharist to make their own personal statements.
The point was never to receive the Sacrament; it's to provoke an embarrassing public incident.
And if his actions are so reprehensible why is nothing done to him?
Obey him?
Whatever do you mean?
You tell me why nothing has been done to him... yet.
Actually, I'm convinced that desecration of the sacrament is one of their primary goals.
Do you always answer questions with questions?
Only the silly ones.
So you saying Mahony outsmarted them?
The alotted time for this trial is not yet complete. Satan has been loosed for a time and the testing is not yet over. Just as Judas was allowed free reign to betray Christ, so modern day Judases are given free reign to betray Christ's Mystical Body.
That's the theological answer.
The practical answer is that Mahony is a clever operator. He sails close to the wind and is nuanced and careful about his deconstruction of the faith. Take the present incident, for instance. What could he be nailed for? The article states that gays were "welcomed in LA". So? He can argue that it's the Church's job to welcome all those who feel drawn to her. Note that Communion was not given to anyone in a Rainbow Sash. Thus, he can rightly claim that he has done nothing in contravention of Cardinal Arinze's directive, if indeed it even was a directive. There were no Rainbow Sashes, no incidents, no confrontation. Just a Pentecost Mass at which there were present unidentified homosexuals. He could claim that this situation is repeated in every diocese.
That's typical of Mahony.
There is nothing silly about my questions, and I asked them because I don't know the answers, which you do not either apparently.
1.
In cooperation with the Catholic Diocese of Cleveland, the University provides the academic component of the formation program for college-level seminarians of the Diocese.
2.

![]()
First Semester Recap:
Queer Eye for the Straight Guy
Movie Night
Washington D.C. AIDS Walk
"The Queer Monologues"
The "Real" Girl Drag Show
Browns vs. Steelers Party
![]()
Second Semester Tentative Events:
Gay Film Fest
Day of Silence
Tunnel of Oppression
"The Queer Monologues: The Abridged Classroom Version"
The First National Gay and Lesbian Conference
for Jesuit Universities - at John Carroll
I think that there's some kind of psychological deficiency in those who wish to get the Catholic Church to support homosexuality. The Catholic Church is a hierarchy, which makes its own rules from the top down. If you don't like it, get out. I'm mystified.
I toured the LA Cathedral recently. Fine acoustics. Beautiful stained glass in the columnbariam/basment. Too much pagan orientation.
Man! Sometimes I wonder how Cardinal Mahoney isn't afraid for the safety of his own soul! Millions of the faithful have been placed into his care, and he repeatedly does things to either dumb down their faith or eradicate their beliefs completely. If anybody needs prayers, this dude certainly does.
Roger has no shame.
At the Cathedral in Burke's STL, not a sash was seen. At least at the 8. I doubt that there were any at the later Masses because we didn't hear a word about it.
Oh, didn't you hear? The new Prefect of the CDF is going to take care of Mahony, after all, Archbishop Levada and Cardinal Mahony are lifelong close friends...
I hope you are including on the homosexual priests.
Pyro7480,Bump.
You're right.
I happened to catch the (network) everning news tonight, (can't remember which), when they had the Rainbow-Sash crowd standing in front of a church.
They were rightfully turned away. Staged for the perfect on-camera "Kodak Moment."
I got furious when they showed a boy, around 10 years old, putting a rainbow sash around him.
I'm sorry, I'm going to say it. These witches/and other expletives will stoop lower than low to make their point.
Figures.
Protection Racketeers(A liberal cardinal protects pedophiles. A liberal press protects the cardinal)
Catholic Activists to Cardinal Mahony: "My Donations Return When You Leave"
Text of Cardinal Mahony's Deposition
Gay-Friendly U.S. Bishops Outed by Homosexual Activist 'Catholic' Group
Rainbow Sash's Top Four
Calif. Church Abuse Cases to Accelerate
and on, and on, and on, and on.....
Oh that's just lovely. Three cheers for "academic freedom".
Understatement of the century. ;-)
I agree with you. Would you say that by allowing him to remain in this position with no reprimand or correction that the Pope is allowing him to endanger the souls of the faithful?
But he's "in communion with Rome". He's a prince of the Church in good standing, under no censure or penalty.
That sounds about right, that and to appear as victims of the "big bad Church".
I am a formerlib too , right here in Mpls. and you really hit on something, I don't think they are as concerned about the Body and Blood of Christ as they are obsessed with circumstances regarding their physical, not spiritual bodies, this I can only hope for the Pope's cont traditional way of the Church, the Church didn't develop out of satisfaction, it dev out of sacrifice of the early Christians. And these people can not even sacrifice anything.
OK. It's time for some disciplinary action.
Cardinal Mahoney, tear down that cathedral!
8-)
ah, but mother angelica gave him H... a couple years ago for a document on the "modern" mass...he tried to have her censored, but the vatican merely told her to retract here statement...which she did so sarcastically that I was lying on the floor laughting...
But then, saints outrank Popes in the RC church...
I remember that. God bless Mother Angelica.
Uh oh.....then comes the smackdown.
Mahony has made a career of dissent....but let anyone dissent from his diktats.....then the smiley mask falls and the liberal thug appears in all its ugliness.
>>>>So you saying Mahony outsmarted them?
Absolutely not. Mahoney is their ally. They take the sashes off so that they don't embarrass him with the Church heirarchy.
It benefits both of them to work this way. It allows Mahoney to say "well, they weren't using the sash and Communion to make political statements in my Church, that's why they can receive."
It allows the Sashers to claim there is a split in the Church, that some cardinals let them recieve, others deny them.
So both Mahoney and the Sashers benefit, scratch my back and I'll scratch yours. Notice: Flynn said they couldn't receive only cause they were wearing the sash. They could have taken it off and received in MN too, and everyone would have still known who they were and that they did it.
patent
Ah.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.