I'm a "pan-millenialist" -- it will all pan out in the end.
bttt
Strawman constructed ...
Never ceases to amayze me how a covenant theologian cannot have a rational discussion about dispensationalism without making some claim like Gentry does. The heart of dispensationalism is not some passage. It is a straightforward application of the grammatical-historical approach to Biblical interpretation (including prophetic sections). Simple application of the grammatical-historical approach brings you unquestionably to dispensational premillenialism.
The main difference between Dispensational and Non-dispensational (Reformed/Covenant) theology, and there are major differences, is in the construction of a Systematic Theology. The dispensationalist uses the following steps:
1. Recognize Presuppositions
2. Construct a Biblical Theology of the OT based on the OT text.
3. Construct a Biblical Theology of the NT based on the NT text.
4. Synthesize results into a Systematic Theology.
The covenant theologian uses the following steps:
1. Recognize Presuppositions
2. Construct a Biblical Theology of the NT based on the NT text.
3. Construct a Biblical Theology of the OT based on the NT understanding of the OT text.
4. Synthesize results into a Systematic Theology.
This is why the covenant theologian sees the Church as the spiritual Israel ... instead of a separate entity of Gods redemptive history.
bump for later