Skip to comments.The Other Catholics: A Short Guide to the Eastern Catholic Churches
Posted on 07/07/2005 12:21:30 PM PDT by NYer
As millions watched the funeral for Pope John Paul II, many were confused by the concluding Panakhyda celebrated not in Latin, but in Greek and Arabic by hierarchs in black hoods, turbans, crowns, and unusual vestments. Was this not the responsibility of the cardinals? And were those clerics even Catholic?
The answer may surprise you, as Catholics are generally unaware that they have millions of coreligionists who are not themselves part of the Roman Catholic Church. Indeed, even the term Roman Catholic isnt quite rightit was actually a derogatory label assigned to us by Anglican Protestants, trying to legitimize their own use of the term Catholic over and against that foreign Church loyal to the pope of Rome.
In point of fact, the Catholic Church directly under the jurisdiction of Rome is properly and canonically termed the Latin Church. All official Church documents simply use the term, Catholic Church. And contrary to popular belief, most of the day-to-day work preformed by the Holy Father is not in his role as pope and pastor of the Universal Church but in his position in the Latin Church as the bishop of Rome and the patriarch of the West.
So who are these other Catholics? They have their own hierarchies and liturgies, as well as their own distinct apostolic lineages. They may look and act like Eastern Orthodox churches, but they recognize the pope of Rome as the head of the visible Church on earth and have suffered for the cause of that unity.
Meet the Catholic Churches. There are more of them than you think.
One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic
According to the Constitution on the Church, Lumen Gentium, the Catholic Church is understood to be a corporate body of Churches, united with the bishop of Rome, who serves as the guardian of unity. The other Catholic Churches are not merely Catholics with papal permission to use different liturgies. They were also founded by the apostles and are particular, autonomous Churches of their own rightful existence (sui iuris). Any individual Catholic may freely attend and receive the sacraments in any of them. After all, Catholic is Catholic.
Because we believe in one, holy, Catholic, and apostolic Church, some might object, There is only one Church, so how can we speak of many Churches? Its helpful to consider an analogy used by the Church Fathers: While there are three distinct Persons who share the One Divine Essence, there are likewise many autonomous individual Churches that make up the one, holy, Catholic, and apostolic Church. As it is with the Triune Godhead, we must be careful not to blur true and important distinctions of the individuals in order to emphasize their unity.
When Christ founded His Church, He commissioned the apostles to go out into the world to preach and baptize. Most Catholics are familiar with the founding of the see of Rome by Peter. The primacy of that Church was sealed with the blood of Peter and Paul, and the succession of bishops continues to the present day. What many do not know is that the other apostles themselves founded churches, and that their own successions of bishops continue as well.
As presently defined, there are 24 Catholic Churches that can be grouped into eight different rites. A rite is a liturgical, theological, spiritual, and disciplinary patrimony of a distinct people manifested in a Church. While each Catholic Church may have its own rite or customs, in general, there are only eight major rites. History, language, misunderstandings, nationalism, and basic human weakness have resulted in the current communion of 24 Churches.
With a few exceptions, the Eastern Catholic Churches result from incomplete reunions with the Orthodox Churches. In those instances, large numbers of bishops and faithful of the Orthodox mother Churches either held back or later rejected union with Rome. Today, many Orthodox are fearful of losing their distinct traditions in a world dominated by the Latin Church. Making matters worse, some of the Eastern Catholic Churches have adopted Latin customs and havent been very good examples of how union with Rome should work. This is tragic, since the traditions of these Churches are themselves apostolic and help preserve the catholicity of the Church with their own unique development of the gospel message. For example, unlike a good Latin parish, in a traditional Eastern Catholic parish you wont find musical instruments, statues, rosaries, or stations of the cross. Indeed, the priest may well have a wife and children, and the church might be without pews or kneelers. In some circumstances, even the Bible might have a larger canon and include Third and Fourth Maccabees. Unity does not mean uniformity.
The following is a brief survey of each of the 24 sui iuris Catholic Churchesall of which are in full communion with Rome. Parishes can be found throughout the United States and Canada. They are grouped by rite and include brief descriptions, along with an estimate of their current membership numbers. Some of these Churches are headed by metropolitans or major archbishops who are independently elected and then confirmed by the pope. The Patriarchal Eastern Catholic Churches elect and consecrate their own patriarch completely independent of the pontiff; letters of official communion are exchanged after the installation. Other Churches simply submit a list of eligible candidates to Rome for consideration.
1. The Patriarchal Latin Catholic Church
There may have once been other Western Catholic Churches, but over time, they were absorbed into the direct jurisdiction of the Latin Church. In response to Protestantism, the Latin Church consolidated the various Western practices into what became known as the Tridentine Rite.
Some variation still exists in the Latin Church: The Mozarabic Rite continues in Toledo, Spain, and the Ambrosian Rite survives around Milaneven into Switzerland. The Bragan, Dominican, Carmelite, and Carthusian Rites were abandoned after Vatican II in favor of the revised Latin Rite.
2. The Patriarchal Armenian Catholic Church
The Armenian Church is a daughter of the New Testament Church of Caesarea, and Thaddaeus and Bartholomew were its founding apostles. Catholics there suffered persecution until the conversion of King Tridates IV made Armenia the first Christian state in history. The missionary work of St. Gregory the Illuminator resulted in an alphabet and translations of Greek and Syrian texts. The Armenian Rite is used exclusively by this Church and is related to both Greek and Syrian Christianity with some Latinization since the Crusades.
While Armenians attended the first three ecumenical councils, they werent represented at the Fourth Ecumenical Council of Chalcedon, which condemned their faith in St. Cyrils definition of One nature of the Word of God incarnate. Armenians formally accused the Byzantine and Latin Churches of the Nestorian heresy in the year 555.
Until the Muslim conquests, Byzantine emperors attempted to impose reunion on the Armenians with some success. Nevertheless, the Armenian Church continued to develop independently with its identity as a people centered on its own language and ecclesial body.
When the Byzantines pushed back the Muslims in 862, they again attempted reunion, only to be rebuffed. Serious discussion with the Byzantine Church began in 1165, but the Armenians established union with the Latin Crusader states in 1198. This union wasnt recognized by those outside of Cilicia. And while Armenians were present at the Council of Florence in 1439, it had no lasting results. Finally, in 1742, Pope Benedict XIV confirmed a former Armenian apostolic bishop as Catholic Patriarch of Cilicia.
The vicious persecution and genocide in Turkey at the end of World War I decimated the Armenians, and the Church was later brutally suppressed under communism. Only with independence in 1991 have communities of Armenian Catholics begun to resurface.
3. The Patriarchal Coptic Catholic Church
The Egyptian Church was founded by the apostle Marka gospel writer and disciple of Petermartyred around 63 A.D. His see was the first Church to develop a strong centralized hierarchy, and the succession from Mark continues to this day. The term Coptic is Arabic, derived from the Greek word for Egyptian. Interestingly enough, the Alexandrian patriarch is the only other patriarch to have the title of pope, and until the Council of Chalcedon, the see of Mark was second in primacy after Rome.
Like the Armenians, the Coptic Church rejected the Council of Chalcedon out of fidelity to St. Cyril of Alexandrias doctrine of One incarnate nature of Christthough there were also political issues regarding their opposition to growing Byzantine domination. Persecutions intended to force acceptance of the Council of Chalcedon only reinforced their resistance. Eventually a succession of Byzantine popes had a small following in the city of Alexandria, and the majority native Coptic popes resided in the desert monastery of St. Marcarius.
After the Arab invasion in 641, the Coptic Church went into decline. Islamic rule brought persecution as well as some periods of relative freedom. The Church has continued to grow, despite recent attacks by Islamic militants and the exodus of those faithful looking for a better life in the West.
While the Coptic Church attended the Council of Florence and agreed to union, it had no concrete results. Other attempts at reunification occurred in 1582 and 1814 but were also unsuccessful. During these failed attempts, many Coptic bishops and faithful did enter union with Rome. For this reason, the Coptic Catholic Church was organized in 1741 when the Coptic bishop of Jerusalem became Catholic. In 1895, Pope Leo XIII of Rome reestablished the patriarchate of Alexandria for the Coptic Catholic Church.
Monasticism began in the Egyptian desert. While there are no Coptic Catholic monasteries to rival those of the Coptic Orthodox, there are religious orders modeled on Western communities involved in educational, medical, and charitable activities.
4. The Ethiopian Catholic Church
Rite: GeezV Membership: 196,853
The Geez Ethiopian Rite is a variation of the Alexandrian Coptic Rite with Syriac and Jewish influence. Judaism was practiced by some Ethiopians before the arrival of Christianity, and pocket communities of Jewish Ethiopians still exist. The Church there is unique in retaining circumcision, dietary laws, and both Saturday and Sunday Sabbath.
When Emperor Ezana converted to Christianity in the fourth century, St. Athanasius of Alexandria ordained the bishops for the Ethiopians. Later, in 480, those who opposed the Council of Chalcedon fled to Ethiopia from Rome, Constantinople, and Syria and evangelized the pagans they found there.
From the time of Athanasius, Ethiopian bishops were routinely appointed by the Coptic patriarch. In 1948, Emperor Haile Selassie reached an agreement with the Coptic Church to establish an autonomous Ethiopian patriarch. And so, Ethiopian Orthodoxy became the state religion until the 1974 communist revolution.
In 1439, Pope Eugenius IV sent a letter to the Ethiopian emperor inviting him to unity with the Catholic Church, but it was rejected. A century later, under attack from the Muslims, the emperor requested military aid from the Portuguese. This led to Pope Gregory XVs appointment of a Portuguese Jesuit as patriarch of the Ethiopian Church in 1626. Sadly, union lasted only ten years after the forced Latinization of the liturgy, customs, and discipline resulted in open bloodshed.
Catholic missionary activity resumed during the Italian occupation of Eritrea and Ethiopia, but the current structure of the Ethiopian Catholic Church wasnt established until 1961.
5. The Patriarchal Antiochian Syrian Maronite Catholic Church
Rite: West Syrian Maronite
Unique among the Eastern Churches, the Maronite Church is entirely Catholic with no corresponding Orthodox Church; it has never broken union with Rome. The Maronite Rite is of West Syrian origin but has been influenced by the East Syrian and Latin traditions. The Eucharist is a variation of the Syriac liturgy of St. James. Notably, this Church maintains the Eucharistic narrative in Aramaicthe actual language of Christ.
The Maronites trace their origin to a group of disciples of the hermit St. Maron and their founding of a great monastery midway between Aleppo and Antioch. They were fervent supporters of the Chalcedonian definition of two natures of Christ, and in 532, a synod in Constantinople made the monastery of Bet Maroun the head of the entire monastic community in northern Syria.
The Maronites suffered brutal persecution at the hands of the non-Chalcedonian Orthodox, while the Muslim Arab rulers of Syria punished all contacts with the Byzantines. When the Byzantine see of Antioch fell vacant, the Maronites proclaimed their own bishop as Patriarch of Antioch and all the East. Unfortunately, hostile relations with the Arabs and rival Christians drove the Maronites to the isolated and remote mountains of Lebanon.
In 1099, the Crusaders received a warm welcome from the Maronites, and their patriarch attended the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215, receiving formal Latin acceptance as the head of the Maronite Church.
With the founding of the Maronite College in Rome in 1584, the Church became quite Latinized. With the encouragement of Vatican II, the Maronite Church revised its missal to return to many of the traditions and customs that had been lost. Since then, the patriarch has ordered all the clergy to wear the original Syriac vestments and has instituted several other Syriac reforms.
6. The Patriarchal Chaldean Catholic Church
Rite: East Syrian
The Assyrian or Chaldean Church was established in Edessa in the first century. After the area was conquered by the Persians, the Church organized itself around a Catholic patriarch in the Persian royal capital at Seleucia-Ctesiphon. While Christians were persecuted by the pagan Roman Empire, they were welcomed into the Persian Empire.
This Church was represented at the Council of Nicea but not at later ecumenical councilsonce the Roman Empire adopted Christianity, the Persian Christians needed to avoid suspicion as Roman collaborators. The Chaldeans always favored the Antiochian school of Christology and welcomed the influx of Nestorian Christians, who were both condemned by the third Ecumenical Council of Ephesus and expelled by Emperor Zeno. Unofficially, they accepted the Council of Chalcedon as a vindication of Antiochian theology.
The Church was a very active missionary force and expanded into India, Tibet, China, Mongolia, and perhaps even Korea and the Philippines. This activity continued even after its Mesopotamian homeland was conquered by the Muslim Arabs. Indeed, it was nearly annihilated by the Mongol invasions of Tamerlane.
In the 13th century, due to Dominican and Franciscan activity in the region, there were several individual conversions of bishops and a few brief flirtations with reunification. Unfortunately, nothing lasting came about. However, in 1551, after one prominent family dominated the Chaldean Church and elected a twelve-year-old as patriarch, a group of concerned bishops elected their own patriarch and sent him to Rome to arrange a union with the Catholic Church. Their overtures were accepted by Pope Julius III in 1553, creating the Chaldean Catholic Church now centered in Baghdad.
Relations with the Assyrian Orthodox Church have also improved. In 1994, the Orthodox Patriarch Mar Dinkha IV and Pope John Paul II signed a common Christological Declaration. Two years later, Mar Dinkha IV and Chaldean Catholic Patriarch Raphael I Bidawid signed a joint patriarchal statement that committed the two Churches to full reintegration, drafting a common catechism and setting up a joint seminary. At this stage, the Assyrians wish to retain their freedom and self-governance while the Chaldean Catholics affirm the necessity of maintaining full communion with Rome.
7. The Syro-Malabar Catholic Church
Rite: East Syrian
The first Christians in India were evangelized by the apostle Thomas in what is now the state of Kerala. For most of their history, they were in communion with the Chaldean-Assyrian Church.
Indian Christians first encountered the Portuguese in 1498, when they warmly received the representatives of the Church of Rome, whose special status they continued to acknowledge despite long isolation.
Sadly, the Portuguese didnt initially accept the legitimacy of the Malabar Church, and in 1599, Latinizations were imposedappointments of Portuguese bishops, changes in the liturgy, Roman vestments, clerical celibacy, and the Inquisition. In 1653, after years of bitterness and tension, most Indian Christians severed their union with Rome. Alarmed, Pope Alexander VII sent Carmelites to India to repair the situation, and most of the Christians eventually returned to full communion with the Catholic Church.
In 1934, Pope Pius XI initiated a process of liturgical reform to restore the historic Syriac nature of the Latinized Syro-Malabar Church. Unfortunately, tension with the Latin Church remains over the establishment of Syro-Malabar jurisdictions in other parts of India where Latin dioceses already exist.
8. The Patriarchal Syrian Catholic Church
Rite: West Syrian
Antioch was one of the ancient centers of Christianity, ranking third in primacy after Rome and Alexandria. When the Council of Chalcedons teachings were rejected by large numbers in the rural areas of his jurisdiction, Jacob Baradai, the bishop of Edessa, ordained several bishops to carry on the Faith of those who had parted from the council. This Church, labeled Jacobite, continued to use the Antiochian West Syrian Rite when urban Antioch adopted the Byzantine Rite.
With the conquest by the Persians, the Syrian Church was free to develop along lines parallel to that of the Assyrian Church with 103 dioceses extending into India, Afghanistan, Turkistan, and Xinjiang, China. Like their rival Assyrian Church, most churches and monasteries were destroyed by the Mongol invasions.
Syrian Orthodox bishops warmly received the Crusaders and discussed union with Rome. But while they attended the Council of Florence and agreed to union, nothing materialized. Jesuit and Capuchin missionaries were very successful, however, and many Syrians were received into communion with Rome. When the patriarchate fell vacant in 1662, the Catholic party was able to elect one of its own as patriarch. Despite this small victory, the Ottoman Empire favored the Syrian Orthodox and forced the Syrian Catholics underground.
Provoking yet another schism, the Syrian Orthodox Holy Synod elected Metropolitan Michael Jarweh of Aleppo as patriarch in 1782. Shortly after he was enthroned, though, he shocked the faithful by declaring himself a Catholic.
9. The Syro-Malankara Catholic Church
Rite: West Syrian
This Church was founded by the East SyrianRite Syro-Malabar Christians that rejected the Portuguese Latinizations. As a group, they were not welcomed back into their former Chaldean-Assyrian Church. In 1665 the non-Chalcedonian Syrian Orthodox agreed to send them a bishop on the condition that they agree to accept non-Chalcedonian Christology and follow the West Syrian Rite instead of the East Syrian Rite. In the 18th century, there were four formal attempts to reconcile the Catholic and Malankara Orthodox Syrian Churches, all of which failed. In 1926, five bishops who were opposed to the jurisdiction of the Syrian Orthodox patriarch in India opened negotiations with Rome. They had asked only that their liturgy be preserved and that the bishops be allowed to retain their dioceses. In response, Rome only required that the bishops make a profession of faith. This instigated a movement of faithful into the new Syro-Malankara Catholic Church.
Churches of the Byzantine Rite
The Byzantine liturgical tradition is a highly stylized form of the Antiochian Rite developed for the Imperial Church based in Constantinople (Byzantium). After the Latin Rite, it is the most widely used rite in the world. At the Council of Chalcedon, the dioceses of Thrace, Pontus, and Asia were absorbed in order to legitimize Constantinople as the see of St. Andrew, the brother of Peter. Currently, there are 16 Eastern Orthodox Churches and 15 Catholic Churches that use the Byzantine Rite.
10. The Patriarchal Melkite Catholic Church
Founded as the Antiochian see of Peter, it was here that the followers of Jesus were first called Christians. The term Melkite comes from the Syriac word for king and was originally used to refer to those within the patriarchates of Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem who accepted the Council of Chalcedon.
With Jesuit, Capuchin, and Carmelite missionary activity in the Greek Orthodox patriarchate of Antioch in the mid-17th century, the Antiochian Church became polarized, with the pro-Catholic party centered in Damascus and the anti-Catholic party in Aleppo.
The pro-Catholic party elected a patriarch in 1724 who was recognized by Pope Benedict XIII. In response, Constantinople excommunicated the Catholic patriarch and appointed a Greek as the Orthodox patriarch of Antioch.
While the Ottoman Empire was very hostile to the Catholic Melkites, the Church continued to grow because the Orthodox patriarch of Antioch was entirely subordinate to the Turks. On a positive note, in 1995, the Antiochian Orthodox and Melkite Catholic Churches agreed to work toward healing the 1724 schism.
11. The Italo-Albanian Catholic Church
>From the earliest periods of Christianity, southern Italy and Sicily had strong connections with Greece and followed the Byzantine tradition. Despite this fact, as part of the Latin patriarchate, the Italo-Albanian Church has always been in union with Rome. Large numbers of Orthodox Albanians fled to this region when their country was conquered by Muslims andinterestingly enoughin 1553, the Italo-Albanian metropolitan archbishop was confirmed by the patriarch of Constantinople, with papal authorization. Thus, the Italo-Albanians have never formally broken communion with the Orthodox Church.
12. The Ukrainian Catholic Church
The Ukrainians first received the Christian faith by way of Constantinople. Metropolitan Isidore of Kiev attended the Council of Florence and agreed to union between the Catholics and Orthodox, but the union was ultimately rejected.
In 1569, Jesuits began working for a local union between Catholics and Orthodox as a way of reducing Protestant influence. The Orthodox, for their part, favored such a union to preserve their Byzantine traditions at a time when the Polish Latin Rite Church was expanding.
A synod of Orthodox bishops at Brest in 1595 proclaimed a reunion between Rome and the metropolitan of Kiev. After similar moves in Przemysl in 1692 and Lviv in 1700, two-thirds of Ukraine had become Catholic. But as Orthodox Russia expanded its control into Ukraine, Catholicism was gradually suppressed. In 1839, Tsar Nicholas I abolished the union in all regions under Russian rule, but the Ukrainian Catholic Church thrived in areas under Austrian control. Later, the Soviet Union forced the Ukrainian Catholic Church into the Russian Orthodox Church.
With the fall of the USSR, Ukrainian Catholics emerged from the catacombs, but theyve not yet recovered all of their stolen property. Lubomyr Cardinal Husar is popularly given the title of Ukrainian Catholic patriarch, but this title hasnt been approved by Rome due to sensitive relations with the Russian and Ukrainian Orthodox.
13. The Ruthenian Catholic Church
Nearly all Trans-Carpathian Ruthenian or Rusyn Orthodox formally united with Rome in 1646. Rusyn ethnic identity remains closely tied to the Byzantine Catholic Church. As a result, they were viciously persecuted and forced into the Russian Orthodox Church by Imperial Russia. Later, the Soviets attempted to wipe out all Rusyn national identity by declaring them to be either Orthodox, Russian, or Ukrainian.
14. The Byzantine Catholic Church USA (Rusyn - Ruthenian - Slovak)
Many Ruthenian or Rusyn Catholics immigrated to North America. In 1891 and again in 1929, almost all returned to the Orthodox after experiencing strained relations with the Latin hierarchy and their imposition of clerical celibacy. Those who remained with the Catholic Church make up the Byzantine Catholic Church USA Metropolitate.
In 1999 William Cardinal Keeler of Baltimore apologized on behalf of the American Latin hierarchy for the inexcusable actions of Archbishop John Ireland of St. Paul, Minnesota, and others responsible for driving so many into what is now the Orthodox Church of America.
15. The Romanian Catholic Church
The apostle Andrew was chosen to carry the gospel to Scythia in what is now Romania. This Byzantine Church is notable in that it exists within a predominantly Latin culture (Romanian is a romance language directly descended from the language of Roman soldiers and settlers).
Romanian delegates attended the Council of Constance in 1414 and signed the decree of union at the Council of Florence. Unfortunately, in 1744 there was a popular movement back to Orthodoxy following violations of religious and civil rights that had been guaranteed by the union with Rome.
Under communism, the Church was suppressed and merged into the Romanian Orthodox Church. In 1989 three secretly ordained Catholic bishops emerged. Since then, there has been considerable tension with the Orthodox over the return of Romanian Catholic Church property.
16. The Greek Catholic Church in Greece
The Greek Orthodox Church is virulently opposed to the existence of this small Church. Indeed, the situation is such that its illegal for Byzantine Catholic priests to dress like Orthodox clergy in Greece. The few Greek Catholics here are served by celibate priests who have transferred from the Latin Church.
17. The Greek Catholic Church in former Yugoslavia
In 1611 a Byzantine vicar, subordinate to the Latin bishops, was appointed for Serbian Orthodox who fled from the Muslim Turks. In 1777, Rome created an independent eparchy for all Byzantines in Croatia under Austrian rule. Approximately 50 percent of this Church is ethnically Rusyn.
18. The Bulgarian Catholic Church
Bulgaria was often in dispute between Rome and Constantinople, but it fell under the jurisdiction of Constantinople in 870 at the Eighth Ecumenical Council. Wanting independence from Constantinople, the Bulgarians negotiated a union with Rome in 1861, but most eventually returned to the Orthodox. This was the only Byzantine Catholic Church not officially suppressed under communismperhaps because Pope John XXIII was once a papal emissary to Bulgaria.
19. The Slovak Catholic Church
In 1646 the Union of Uzhorod was accepted in what is now eastern Slovakia. After communism fell, most of the confiscated ecclesial property was returned to the Catholic Church. In America, Slovaks are not distinguished from Ruthenians or Rusyns.
20. The Hungarian Catholic Church
A Greek monk named Hierothus from Constantinople was consecrated the first bishop of Hungary around 950. As the cracks of schism grew between Latins and Greeks, the Byzantine Rite Hungarians remained in communion with a Serbian Orthodox metropolitan. But after a number of union agreements, most of the Orthodox became Byzantine Catholic.
In the 18th century, a group of Hungarian Protestants decided to become Catholic but chose to enter the Byzantine Catholic Church instead of the Latin Church. While Greek had been the liturgical language, in 1900 Pope Leo XIII approved the use of Hungarian.
21. The Russian Catholic Church
Membership: 20 parishes worldwide
In its conversion from paganism, Russia accepted Byzantine Christianity while still in full communion with Rome in 988. The institutional Russian Catholic Church began in the 19th century as the result of a movement involving Vladimir Soloviev and Rev. Nicholas Tolstoy. They believed the schism between Greeks and Latins never created any official break between Russia and Rome.
In 1908 Pope Pius X appointed an apostolic exarchate. The decree from the Vatican Secretariat of State read: Therefore His Holiness commands the aforementioned to observe the laws of the Byzantine Rite faithfully and in all their integrity, without any admixture from the Latin Rite or any other Rite; he must also see that his subjects, clergy and all other Catholics, do the same.
Under communism the greater part of the Russian Catholic clergy and faithfultogether with Georgian Catholics, Armenian Catholics, and Latin Catholicswere put to death along with thousands of Orthodox, Protestants, and Jews in the mass executions of the gulags.
22. The Belarusian Catholic Church
The Belarusian Catholic Church began in the Union of Brest in 1596 and became the state religion, but it was later suppressed by Imperial Russia and again by the Soviet Union. Strongly associated with Belarusian nationalism, it has no organized hierarchy.
23. The Albanian Catholic Church
The apostle Paul preached in Illyricum and Titus preached in Dalmatia, both of which are found in modern-day Albania. The first bishop was Kaisarios, one of the 70 apostles. Sadly, most Albanians became Muslim during the Turkish conquest.
Both the Catholic and Orthodox Churches were suppressed in 1967 when Albania was declared an atheist state; religious buildings were closed, and no services of any kind were permitted.
24. The Georgian Catholic Church
The Georgian Church began in 337 and used the Syriac Rite of St. James. When the neighboring Armenians rejected the Council of Chalcedon, the Georgians accepted the conciliar decrees and adopted the Byzantine Rite.
Theatine and Capuchin missionaries worked for reunion in Georgia, but under Imperial Russia in 1845, Catholics were not allowed to use the Byzantine Rite. Many Catholics adopted the Armenian Rite until the institution of religious liberty in 1905, which allowed them to return to the Byzantine Rite. In 1937 the Georgian Catholic exarch was executed by the Soviets.
At present, the Georgian Catholic Church has no organized hierarchy.
Outreach from Rome to the Eastern Orthodox has increased in the past 30 years. Pope John Paul II worked tirelessly to reach out to Eastern Christianshis own mother, in fact, was an Eastern Catholic. And it appears that Benedict XVI will continue this effort. The day after his inauguration, he received representatives of the Russian and Ukrainian Orthodox Churches and has since stated that one of his primary goals is to address the difficulties that continue between Catholics and Orthodox.
It remains a deep and abiding tragedy that Orthodoxy and Catholicismsister Churches in the Apostolic Faithremain at odds. Any semblance of official reunion will take time; many Orthodox Churches still struggle to discover their own identity after generations of control by tsars, kings, sultans, nationalism, communism, and the new emergence of evangelicalism and renewed Islamic militancy. In the hope of that reconciliation, the Eastern Catholic Churches can act as a bridgea mediator between East and West. In them, the Eastern traditions are both preserved and united with the West. In spite of a difficult past, theyre a sign of great hope and a pattern for how Eastern practice might coexistwithout corruption or confusionwith the Latin Church and the universal office of the papacy. As we have seen, maintaining this balance requires great care.
Genuine apostolic tradition is preserved in the Eastern Catholic Churches. Insofar as some have drifted toward Latin practices, theyve abandoned the unique traditions passed on to them by their founding apostles. This is a tragedy for all Catholics. Unity, again, is not uniformity. The Catholic Church is universal, and in its God-ordained diversity, there is great strength.
After reading this article, should you wish to experience an Eastern liturgy, check the following link to see if there are any in your community.
Mar Nasrallah Pierre Sfeir, Maronite Patriarch and Pope JPII
Thank you for this much needed guide.
Some Important Eastern Church Terms
Antiminsion A rectangular cloth with an icon of the tomb of Christ, consecrated by the bishop and without which no sacrament can be preformed.
Antidoron Blessed but unconsecrated bread given to all at the end of the liturgy.
Chrismation Roughly, the Eastern equivalent of the Sacrament of Confirmation.
Council of Chalcedon Convened in 451, the council fathers affirmed "Christ in two natures of one person without mixture, without change, without separation and without division." This definition was contrary to the traditional Alexandrian theology of "One incarnate nature of Christ." The council also established Constantinople as ranking second only to Rome and ahead of Alexandria and Antioch.
Council of Lyons II An ecumenical council held in 1274 with the aim of ending disputes with the Greek Church. It added the words "and the Son" to the Nicene Creed, which resulted in its rejection by a Greek Council in Constantinople in 1277.
Council of Nicea Inviting bishops from across the world in 325, the emperor Constantine hoped to settle the main disputes separating the faithful. The heresies of Arius were condemned and the Divinity of Christ was affirmed as being of the same substance as that of the Father (Arius claimed that Jesus was a creation of the Father, and was not Himself God); the date for the Feast of the Resurrection (Easter) was set according to the solar calendar; and the council formally established the primacy of the patriarchs of Rome, Alexandria, and Antioch.
Divine Liturgy The Eastern eucharistic service equivalent to the Mass.
Dormition of Mary Roughly, the Eastern equivalent of the Assumption.
Ecclesia sui iuris Latin term for autonomous Churches of their own rightful existence.
Eparch or Hierarch The Eastern equivalent of a bishop.
Eparchy The Eastern equivalent of a diocese.
Exarch A bishop one rank below a patriarch.
Filioque The Latin term "and from the Son" inserted into the Nicean Creed by the Latin Church in the year 1274. Considered by the Orthodox a major cause of theological division.
Great Fast Eastern term for Lent, which for Eastern Churches begins on the Monday before Ash Wednesday (the 40 days are counted differently).
Great Vespers Non-eucharistic Saturday evening service (does not count toward the Sunday obligation).
Greek Catholic An outdated term for Byzantine Catholic.
Icon A two-dimensional image written according to strict guidelines and venerated as would be the relic of a saint.
Iconostasis An icon-adorned screen separating the altar from the church proper.
Metropolitan Roughly, the Eastern equivalent of an archbishop.
Myrovannya Slavic term for a festal anointing with blessed oil.
Mysteries Roughly, the Eastern term for sacraments.
Patriarch The highest-ranking bishop. The pope, for example, is the patriarch of the West.
Panakhyda An Eastern requiem or memorial service.
Paraklesis A service for the intercession of the Lord, the Mother of God, and the saints.
Pascha Eastern term for the Feast of the Resurrection (Easter), derived from the term Passover.
Prosphora Eastern term for the bread used for the host.
Raso or Ryassa Eastern equivalent of a cassock.
Rite A liturgical, theological, spiritual, and disciplinary patrimony of a distinct people manifested in a Church sui iuris.
Uniat or Uniate A derogatory term for an Eastern Church in communion with Rome.
Zeon Boiling water added to the chalice representing the Holy Spirit and the water from the side
Something is wrong with the picture.
What's wrong with the picture?
Readers may also wish to visit the Catholic Near East Welfare Association's website for more in depth Eastern Church resources and for the highly recommended book by Ronald Roberson, CSP: The Eastern Christian Churches A Brief Survey (6th edition) which is available for reading online at http://www.cnewa.org/ecc-bodypg.aspx?eccpageID=3&IndexView=toc
Thanks for the link ... I'll definitely check it out. One of my favorite resource books is:
Fr. Anthony J. Salim
A Resource Book by Rev. Anthony J. Salim about Maronite Syriac Catholics
By: Bar Lebnon
This book is not only for Maronite Catholics but also for all people who want to know more about one of the rich Traditions of the Catholic Church. There are many ways to be a Catholic. When people think of Catholicism, they too often think that the Tradition of Roman Catholicism is the only way that Catholics live out their faith commitment. However; this couldn't be further from the truth.
There are in fact many Catholics whose spiritual, liturgical, historical, even disciplinary Traditions are closer to the Eastern Traditions of the Church and to the Eastern origins of Christianity. Fr. Salim has written a pastoral text that attempts to explain for the general reader how the Catholic Faith is expressed in one of these ancient Churches, the Syriac-Maronite Catholic Church. With theological roots in ancient Antioch, third most important city in the Roman Empire, and organized in defending the pivotal teachings of the Council for Chalcedon, Maronite Catholics take their name and heritage from St. Maron, a monk and holy man of Syria of the fifth century. Fr. Salim has explored how this Eastern Church, which has never separated from communion with the Sea of Rome, is attempting to renew itself in light of its proper sources and after the Second Vatican Council.
A must for anyone seeking to expand her or his knowledge of what it means to be fully Catholic today. "His work is a true testimony of our Church praxis here in the States. At the same time it is a window for those who want to look inside that Church, and, through it, inside the Eastern mind in general. It helps the reader to reflect, compare, adjust and face a different sensitivity in front of the same beliefs and truths.
We all learn from it, we are all called to be "captivated" in one way or another by the immense, diverse and surprising treasures of the church's teachings. I would like to see his work placed in the hands of clergy and laity, especially those who are directly involved in religious education and training for children as well as for adults. I hope it is a first stone of a higher building in this field." ---The Rev. Stephen H. Doueihi, Ordinary of the Maronite Catholic Eparchy of St. Maron of Brooklyn.
In almost 500 informative pages, the author presents 'the teachings of the Catholic Church, through the eyes, heart and soul of the Maronite Tradition' (Introduction). Captivated by Your Teachings is a necessary catechetical resource for all Eastern Christians in order to understand better the diversity among the Eastern Churches. Use of this monumental work will help all Catholics, Eastern and Western, no matter to what particular church of the Catholic Communion of Churches they belong, understand what it means to be Church. Those from the Byzantine tradition will be brought to a new awareness of the other Eastern Catholic churches by the reading of this text.
"In the hope of that reconciliation, the Eastern Catholic Churches can act as a bridgea mediator between East and West. In them, the Eastern traditions are both preserved and united with the West. In spite of a difficult past, theyre a sign of great hope and a pattern for how Eastern practice might coexistwithout corruption or confusionwith the Latin Church and the universal office of the papacy."
This is precisely the formula that both Rome and the Orthodox Churches condemned and rejected at Balamand in 1993! Orthodoxy has no interest in becoming "Uniates".
I suspect your knowledge is pretty extensive, but for any Western Catholic who wants a very simple and easy to read primer on Eastern Catholics Msgr. George Appleyard's "The Light of the East: An Introduction to Eastern Catholicism of Western Catholics".
It is available from the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Parma (I think I bought it while back) and is very well laid out including a comparitive chart in the back.
Thank you for that information. I will definitely look into addding that book to my growing library.
Again that use of the term "uniates" - A derogatory term for an Eastern Church in communion with Rome.
What about the 'formula' condemned and rejected?
Here is paragraph 12 of the Balamand Agreement:
"12) Because of the way in which Catholics and Orthodox once again consider each other in relationship to the mystery of the Church and discover each other once again as Sister Churches, this form of "missionary apostolate" described above, and which has been called "uniatism", can no longer be accepted either as a method to be followed nor as a model of the unity our Churches are seeking."
As for the use of the term "uniate", I know that some of the Eastern Rite Churches in communion with Rome object to that term, but there is no condemnation of it in the Agreement and frankly, it does describe that group of Churches quite well, especially if their adhereants continue to believe that they are some sort of model for future union with Orthodoxy.
"As for the use of the term "uniate", I know that some of the Eastern Rite Churches in communion with Rome object to that term, but there is no condemnation of it in the Agreement and frankly, it does describe that group of Churches quite well, especially if their adhereants continue to believe that they are some sort of model for future union with Orthodoxy."
I think it's like any term. Once it's used enough times, its negative connotations begin to lose their impact.
As for my "uniate" church being a model of future union with Orthodoxy, I doubt it. The history of the Byzantine churches in the U.S. hasn't been all that rosy.
I think a better model for ecumenism is simply working together on points of mutual interest, and trying to develop a greater appreciation for the Orthodox churches within Catholicism. That's going to take some time. An optimistic scenario is that some time in the future you'll be unified in all but name. But even if that doesn't happen, you've at least cooperated in facing mutual challenges.
"I think a better model for ecumenism is simply working together on points of mutual interest, and trying to develop a greater appreciation for the Orthodox churches within Catholicism. That's going to take some time. An optimistic scenario is that some time in the future you'll be unified in all but name. But even if that doesn't happen, you've at least cooperated in facing mutual challenges"
That's sort of what is happening in Lebanon.
"That's sort of what is happening in Lebanon."
Really? Who is involved?
"Really? Who is involved?"
Maronites, Melkites and Orthodox. There's even a sort of de facto if not de jure communion among them which has reportedly spread over here to No. America.
The entire Balamand Statement is interesting:
initiatives were taken within certain Churches and impelled by outside elements, to restore communion between the Church of the East and the Church of the West. These initiatives led to the union of certain communities with the See of Rome and brought with them, as a consequence, the breaking of communion with their Mother Churches of the East. This took place not without the interference of extra-ecclesial interests. In this way Eastern Catholic Churches came into existence. And so a situation was created which has become a source of conflicts and of suffering in the first instance for the Orthodox but also for Catholics.
Gotta remember those oh-so-helpful 'extra-ecclesial interests' that are part of the story of how we got to where we are today. It wasn't just a long series of theological disagreements.
I think a better model for ecumenism is simply working together on points of mutual interest, and trying to develop a greater appreciation for the Orthodox churches within Catholicism. That's going to take some time. An optimistic scenario is that some time in the future you'll be unified in all but name. But even if that doesn't happen, you've at least cooperated in facing mutual challenges.
Excellent point perhaps that area of common interest is the turning back of the tide of secularism in Europe through a cooperative Dialogue as proposed by Benedict XVI and supported by the Orthodox Bishop of Viena and Austria Hilarion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.