Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope makes pilgrimage to Mary statue in Rome, marking the feast of the Immaculate Conception
Catholic News Agency ^ | December 8, 2005

Posted on 12/08/2005 1:29:11 PM PST by NYer

Rome, Dec. 08, 2005 (CNA) - After the Mass celebrated in Saint Peters Basilica, Pope Benedict marked the feast of the Immaculate Conception, paying homage to the statue of Mary in Rome's historic Piazza di Spagna .

Thousands of Romans flocked to the square to greet the German pope, on his first 'pilgrimage' to the sculpture of the Virgin .

The tradition of the papal pilgrimage was brought back by his predecessor John Paul II more than 20 years ago .

"I deliver to the celestial mother of the Redeemer the anxieties and hopes of humanity," the 78-year-old pontiff said. He called on Mary to grace mankind with her spiritual presence "in every moment of our existence, above all during moments of darkness and trials." The statue of the Virgin Mary stands on a column in the northern section of the piazza, just around the corner from the famed Spanish Steps known to all tourists .

The column was erected by Pope Pius IX in 1854 after he declared the dogma of her immaculate conception, meaning that Jesus' mother was conceived without the stain of original sin .


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; General Discusssion; Ministry/Outreach; Prayer; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: mary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: PetroniusMaximus

The very words that she heard from Gabriel.


81 posted on 12/11/2005 1:13:16 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

"just like Mary. The salient term is "like""

The salient word is caritovw "full of grace". The believer and Mary have both been made "caritovw".



"After her encounter with Jesus, Mary was incapable of spiritual death. "

So you believe in the preservation of the saints? :)



"We go furthermore, of course, to say that from before all time she was destined to choose life over death."

I though predestination was anathama?


82 posted on 12/11/2005 1:35:01 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

"The very words that she heard from Gabriel."

I can accept that.


83 posted on 12/11/2005 1:35:21 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

"Full of grace" proves nothing.

Even you have to admit her encounter was something special. Talk about a "personal relationship with Jesus."

Who said that predestination is anathema? Double predestination, maybe.


84 posted on 12/11/2005 1:42:05 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
""Full of grace" proves nothing. "

???


"Even you have to admit her encounter was something special. Talk about a "personal relationship with Jesus." "

Indeed.



"Who said that predestination is anathema? Double predestination, maybe."

Now I'm pretty sure you guys don't believe in predestination... but I could be wrong.
85 posted on 12/11/2005 1:46:17 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
And what did she "hear." Like Isaiah she said, "Here I am, Lord.But she encountered God in a way like no other human being has encountered him. No wonder that the Koran takes pains to deny the incarnation.
86 posted on 12/11/2005 1:47:24 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
Look up "immaculate conception" in the Catholic encyclopedia. Might as well look up predestination, too, although that gets pretty hairy. But, no, predestination is accepted so long as it does not forestall free will. That's why Calvinists--and others--call St. Thomas a semi-Pelagian.
87 posted on 12/11/2005 1:51:33 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
The rest of the commentary has no Biblical support

Claiming that a passage in the Bible about a woman who gives birth to the Christ is about Mary does not require very much Biblical support. It is pre-eminently self-evident. Extending the mystical definition of Mary to the Church, or beyond to Heavenly Jerusalem, requires theology, personal revelation and extrapolation, none of which are available to non-Catholics. But it is those who wish to claim that Mary is in no way the object of Rev. 12 who need to provide Biblical proof. Simply saying so doesn't quite cut it.

Eve says no, and her kind are set against the serpent. Mary says yes, and her son is set against the serpent. Jesus bequeaths his own mother as the mother of his beloved disciple. The offerings of Jesus to the apostles are universaly held to apply to all believers. A woman whose kind are beset by the serpent are identified as disciples of the Christ.

There is no math to do here.

Heavenly Jerusalem cannot be the "mother" of Jesus, for it is Jesus whose redemptive sacrifice enabled it to come into being. He proceeds it. Earthly Israel cannot be the great wonder in Heaven, it is the faithlessness of Israel that necessitated the New Covenant in the first place. The Queen of Heaven is Mary, from the first. Her being extends outwards to encompass the Church and then the New Jerusalem itself, ultimately becoming what she was from the first: the Bride.

v.

88 posted on 12/11/2005 7:13:34 PM PST by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

""Full of grace" proves nothing. "

Oh, now I see your point. Let me explain.

"Full of grace" is the phrase most Catholics use to try to prove Mary sinless. Hence my comparitive reference to Ephesians.


89 posted on 12/11/2005 8:23:01 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

It never has.


90 posted on 12/11/2005 8:28:36 PM PST by The Cuban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

What "proves" Mary sinless is her closeness to God. How Protestants could profess to believe in the Virgin Birth and yet treat Mary as if she were on the same level as the mothers of Issac. Samuel or John the Baptist is beyond me. As a matter of history, neither Luther nor Calvin made this mistake. While denying her a "throne" so to speak, they realized how necessary her holiness was to the divinity of Jesus. Demote her and Jesus becomes a mere prophet OR someone not human, not truly God and truly man.


91 posted on 12/11/2005 9:02:41 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

"What "proves" Mary sinless is her closeness to God."

What fails to prove Mary sinless is the lack of Biblical testimony. Look at this post:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1536483/posts?page=168#168


92 posted on 12/12/2005 9:48:46 AM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

Well, the lack of "Biblical testimony" did not keep most of the Protestant reformers from accepting the tradition of the Church with regard to this matter, nor the doctrine of the Trinity as laid down by the ecumenical councils. Of course, many Protestants are actually Nestorians but do not acknowledge the fact. Marianology is so closely linked to Christology, that where one "demotes" Mary, one tends to demote Christ. Neglect of Mary can take bizarrre. I attended a Methodist wedding at Xmas time in Maryland. There was a manger scene in the Church, but no statue of Mary. I asked why not, and got a strange reply. "We just don't do that." Did Jesus just pop out of the air?


93 posted on 12/12/2005 10:40:12 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

*****"...with regard to this matter, nor the doctrine of the Trinity as laid down by the ecumenical councils."

Do you know of anything regarding the doctrine of the Trinity as put forth by the councils that can not be referenced by Scripture?



*****"many Protestants are actually Nestorians"

I don't know of any that woud hold to Nestorian heresy - except the liberal, and they are only half-Nestorican (Jesus only had a human nature).




*****"Marianology is so closely linked to Christology, that where one "demotes" Mary, one tends to demote Christ."

My concern is that the exalation of Mary is an attack on the unique ness of Christ. I hear Catholic teaching and theology that ascribes to Mary attributes which in the Bible I only find ascribed to God. I don't mena to provoke here - just being honest.



94 posted on 12/12/2005 10:50:03 AM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
Of course there are excesses. What I am pointing out is the excesses in the other direction.

As a matter of fact, the use of the philosophic terms " substance" and "person." (in the Latin) was famously debated. But mention of the Scriptures only points out the very reason for the Councils, which was the ambiguity of the Scriptures on the relationship of Jesus (and the Holy Ghost) to the Father. Arius quoted Scripture, also. Despite them we have in the end, three prominent "trinitarian" views" The Nestorian, the Monophysite, and the Orthodox. That in addition to the older Sabellian view. Speaking of neglect, ask someone WHO they think the Holy Spirit is. The Pentecostals are the only ones who give "Him" due worship, but what do they believe ABOUT him? There is a lot of theological primitivism in all the churches, because people think that we ought not even to attempt to answer such questions. Deference to mystery is one thing, but that does not keep scientists from delving into the nature of "matter." even though matter increasingly seems an intellectual construct.
95 posted on 12/12/2005 11:19:31 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

This is the POINT YOU MISS-She was conceived IMMACULATE- for the womb of her Mother,St. Anne...and she CONCEIVED Jesus IMMACULATE..she next to Jesus is the ONLY ONE EVR BORN ON EARTH who did NOT HAVE ORGINAL SIN>>>God did this to her because from the beginning HE CHOSE >>>HER>> TO BE the Mother of Jesus the True God and True Man..
Mary is called the Mother of Divine Grace..it is this I refer...and that SHe carried in her womb DIVINTY HIMSELF she also may be called DIVINE MOTHER!


96 posted on 12/13/2005 6:09:55 PM PST by Rosary (Pray the rosary daily,wear the Brown scapular)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

Explained in TRUE DEVOTION TO MARY,or the Dheuy Rheims Catholic version (RED) BIBLE..the oldest and truest BIBLE >>ALSO refered to as the HADDOCK BIBLE>>>>


97 posted on 12/13/2005 6:13:53 PM PST by Rosary (Pray the rosary daily,wear the Brown scapular)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

Guess yo do not believe that the Pope is the sucessor of St. Peter either??? and no other Church has a Pope..and Christ gave Peter the Keys to Heaven?
And Christ said, behold your Mother? ECT ect. ect.


98 posted on 12/13/2005 6:15:43 PM PST by Rosary (Pray the rosary daily,wear the Brown scapular)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Rosary

*****" This is the POINT YOU MISS-She was conceived IMMACULATE- for the womb of her Mother,St. Anne"

There is no Biblical proof that what you are referring to ever occurred. This is just speculation built up to support your theology.


*****"she next to Jesus is the ONLY ONE EVR BORN ON EARTH who did NOT HAVE ORGINAL SIN>"

The Biblical witness is that there is only ONE person ever referred to who never sinned. I bet you can guess who that one person was.


*****" Mary is called the Mother of Divine Grace.."

Where is that title used in the Bible?



*****"she also may be called DIVINE MOTHER!"

"Divine Mother" is an occultic term.

http://divinemother.net/
http://www.goddess.ws/
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&c2coff=1&safe=off&q=divine+mother&spell=1


Mary is not God, therefore she is not divine. Your belief is not Biblical, it is occultic.

That should bother you.


99 posted on 12/13/2005 6:24:39 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Rosary

" Explained in TRUE DEVOTION TO MARY"

Hey, you need to put the quote you are referring to in there so I can see exactly what you are responding to.


100 posted on 12/13/2005 6:26:02 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson