To: narses; GatorGirl; maryz; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; livius; goldenstategirl; ...
We are not facing a heresy. One cannot say in correct, exact, precise terms that there is a schism [here]
. There is a schismatic attitude in the consecration of bishops without a pontifical mandate. They are inside the Church;
there is only lacking a full, a more perfect -- as was said in the meeting with Msgr. Fellay --a fuller communion, because there is communion (http://qien.free.fr/20051113_hoyos.htm).
Unfortunately, Msgr. Lefebvre went ahead with the consecration and hence the situation of separation came about, even if it was not a formal schism (http://www.30giorni.it/us/articolo.asp?id=9360).
posted on 12/31/2005 4:03:54 PM PST
(St Thomas says “lex injusta non obligat”)
So is this saying that the SSPX is NOT in schism?
This could actually make some headway!
posted on 12/31/2005 4:06:17 PM PST
(God blessed me with a wonderful husband.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson