Posted on 04/22/2006 2:34:31 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
Inspired by box-office smashes such as The Passion of the Christ and The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, studios are not only casting an eye to more religious-themed stories, but they're also marketing movies more aggressively than ever to churchgoers.
Producers now find themselves making sales pitches to ministers. Executives are screening films in church community rooms. One studio has created a "faith division" to market to the devout.
The strategy has two aims: to use faith-based hits to help staunch a three-year box-office slide and to convert those with little faith in Hollywood fare into permanent moviegoers.
No fewer than a dozen films with religious themes are on tap through 2007. Not all of the movies are overtly spiritual: Next month's The Da Vinci Code, for instance, is based on a novel that has infuriated Catholics for questioning the origins and motives of Christianity. But all are hoping to cash in on a demographic that has been largely overlooked since Charlton Heston grabbed some tablets and a chariot a half-century ago.
Among the high-profile films in the works:
The Da Vinci Code (opening May 19). Based on Dan Brown's best seller, the Tom Hanks thriller tells of a murder at the Louvre and possible Vatican involvement.
Nativity (Dec. 1). Keisha Castle-Hughes plays the Virgin Mary in this story of her trek with Joseph to Bethlehem for the birth of Jesus.
The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian (Dec. 14, 2007). The Christian parable and sequel to last year's hit continues the story of siblings who are caught in a battle of good vs. evil in a fantasy kingdom.
"Hollywood is finally waking up to the fact that people who go to church also go to the movies," says Tyler Perry, the director who turned his church plays into the surprise hits Diary of a Mad Black Woman and Madea's Family Reunion. "I'm not sure what took them so long to see that — or how long they'll keep it up.
"But at least we're getting the chance to prove that there's an audience for movies with the right message."
There's also money. The literary world has been reaping profits for decades with religious fare. The biblical Left Behind novels by Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins, for example, have racked up sales of more than $650 million and spawned four movies.
But it wasn't until Passion arrived in theaters in February 2004 that major studios saw their own stairway to financial heaven.
Before Mel Gibson's telling of the Crucifixion, "we all knew we had a lot to learn about this market, which was obviously underserved," says Steve Feldstein of 20th Century Fox's new division, Fox Faith.
The department markets DVDs and feature films to hundreds of pastors nationwide. The studio offers churches trailers, posters and even Bible study guides for its Christian-based home videos with titles such as Beyond the Splendor Gates and Hangman's Curse.
As The Passion of the Christ marched to more than $370 million in North America, "it gave us all our MBAs pretty quickly," Feldstein says. Executives discovered that a thumbs-up from a pastor could go further than from a film critic and that word of mouth spreads pretty quickly in a church, he says. "For many families, church isn't just somewhere you go to pray," he says. "It's a social venue. There's more opportunity for discussion of things beyond just faith."
Reuben Cannon discovered the power of the divine at the box office in Houston in 2003. Cannon, a producer, was attending the annual Woman, Thou Art Loosed conference, a religious convention based on Bishop T.D. Jakes' self-help novel of the same name.
Cannon was astounded to see the conference draw 60,000 people, primarily women, each day of the three-day convention. "Rock stars don't draw 60,000 women a day," he says. "I thought if we could bring in that kind of audience into a theater, we'd have a hit."
He was right. Cannon produced the film adaptation of Loosed in 2004 for less than $1 million. It brought in nearly $7 million and paved the way for Cannon to produce two No. 1 films, last year's Diary of a Mad Black Woman, which raked in $50.6 million, and this year's Reunion, which earned $63.1 million, more than 10 times its budget.
He built momentum for the films much the way Gibson did for Passion and Disney executives did for Narnia: with private screenings for church members and private sales pitches to ministers.
"With so much competition, you can't just put your movie out there with a few ads," says Chuck Viane, head of distribution for Disney. "You have to build word of mouth. And it can build quickly" in the religious community.
When the church is united behind a film, "it has a pretty profound effect," Cannon says. "That's why people are paying a lot more attention to the mega-pastors. When you've got thousands of people who listen to you every week, when you can rent out entire theaters, you've got a powerful voice."
Indeed, studios are finding that ministers who preach to flocks of 5,000 or more a week can be as powerful a marketing tool as a slick advertising campaign.
The clergy, says Steve Rothenberg, distribution chief for Lionsgate Films, are one of the few links "to a group that's been largely ignored when it comes to movies."
"I'm not sure why, but Hollywood didn't considerchurchgoers a very viable audience," says Rothenberg, whose studio distributed Diary and Reunion. "But I think that's changing, especially with the success of the movies recently."
Industry executives are revising advertising campaigns to recognize audiences of faith. Traditionally, studios market movies to the "four quadrants": men, women, moviegoers younger than 25, and those 25 and older. The churchgoing community has become the "fifth quadrant."
Just how big that demographic is, however, is anyone's guess. According to a Gallup survey in December, about 57% of Americans consider religion "very important" in their everyday lives.
Hollywood has found religion before. Through the 1950s, studios churned out hits (1953's The Robe, 1956's The Ten Commandments, 1959's Ben-Hur). But by the mid-'60s, religious epics gave way to musicals, leaving religious fare largely to niche producers.
The industry is just now rediscovering the scope of the faith-based audience, says Joel Silver, producer of The Reaping, starring Hilary Swank as a Christian missionary who loses her faith after a tragedy. It's due Aug. 11. "We really haven't marketed to that group," Silver says. "I'm not sure why. We market to urban audiences."
Joe Bubar, a minister at the Scottsdale (Ariz.) Bible Church, welcomes being Hollywood's hot new demographic. His church rented five theaters during the opening week of Narnia and urged its 5,500 members to turn out in force.
He says churches welcome faith-based films as much as Hollywood welcomes faith-based money. "We're looking for things that help us deliver our message," he says. "And, particularly with younger people, movies do that. We welcome movies with a positive message."
Some filmmakers, in turn, are responding with biblically based stories such as Passion or Nativity and other films that take an earnest look at religion.
"There's another way to look at faith in movies," says James Marsh, director of The King, a William Hurt drama about a minister father who reunites with his troubled son that's due May 19. "Instead of mocking religious people or portraying them as hypocrites, you're seeing a more straight-up examination of how hard it is to be righteous. And I don't think we're losing anything in terms of dramatic storylines."
J.J. Abrams, who routinely examines faith in his television series Lost, doesn't see the move toward religious-based entertainment as pandering.
"We're seeing more religion in mass entertainment because it has become so topical," says Abrams, whose Mission: Impossible III is due May 5. "Given all the conflict in the world based on religion, I think there's a real hunger for that kind of dialogue."
Perhaps, but selling movies to faith-based audiences also means hearing from them when they're not happy with your film. Already, Sony Pictures is bracing for possible protests over Da Vinci.
The studio has set up a website, www.thedavincidialogue.com, that essentially distances Sony from the film's message by presenting counterarguments to the drama. The site features essays by religious scholars about the historical beginnings of Christianity and invites readers to chime in.
From ourselves, it's downright impossible, but through faith in Him righteousness is the simplest thing ever encountered to receive.
After reading that, I just skipped down to the comments.
Actually that email originated as a USA Today article, FYI.
It may be funny to you, but to many so-called Christians who wouldn't know what Christianity is really about if it hit them in the face will be led to believe this is the "truth about Jesus" and be led into believing THE lie: that Jesus was just another man who claimed to be a prophet of God, but turned out to be a profit of God instead. So to them, it's a religious movie that reveals the "True Christianity". My brother is deeply steeped into this lie, and even though reading is taboo to him usually he was mezmerized by this book and read 4 other books on this subject and subjects relating to the "truth about Christianity".
The LW&W was one of my favorite books as a kid and I was excited when the movie came out.
I can't put my finger on it, but unlike the book, I didn't "feel an attachment" to Aslan's character, nor was his sacrifice scene as terrifying as it was in the book. I remember sobbing when I read the book, but not one tear in the movie.
Maybe it's just because I'm old now.
When I want to watch a Christian film, I prefer to watch the ones made by people who are actual Christians, e.g. Cloud Ten Productions, Dave and Rich Christiano, David White and Kevin Downes, etc. Call me crazy, but I don't trust secular Hollywood's new versions of "religious" films. (especially if they're going to include The DaVinci Code in that genre)
I concur. It's better to watch movies made by Christian Studios because their reputation is on the line if they produce something that totally inaccurate or blasephemous like the "DaVinci Code". I prefer to call it the DaVinci Corruption" or the DaVinci Delusion". By the way, D. James Kennedy of Coral Ridge Ministries is producing a 1 hour documentary about this very topic and it's deception. It will air in May, just before the "Davinci Code" movie is released to theatres so that the public will be educated as to what deceptions to look for when they watch it at the theatres around the country. I for one will not go to see it because it will only add to their coffers. I am praying that every movie projector that tries to show this blasphemous piece of crap will freeze up and it lamps will burn out so that not even one second of the movie will be able to be shown in any theatre. This would really cause a buzzstorm in the media and by the public at large. Of course I only want this to happen if it's in God's will. He may use this movie to bring glory to His Name in ways we can't even imagine. His ways are not our ways, and our thoughts are not His thoughts. But I just can't watch to see what happens, through prayer, I want to make things happen. I know in the end, the plans of Satan will backfire and WILL ultimately bring glory to Jesus.
What religion do these types of fantasy movies portray?"
If you don't know, it would be hard to explain since you probably aren't acquainted with the Christian faith. It would only make sense to someone who is knowledgable about Christianity and the purpose of Jesus becoming God the Father's Sacrificial Lamb for the sin of mankind.
Do you know how popular C.S. Lewis is in the Christian Community? Or J.R.R. Tolkin? I would rather watch a fantasy based on moral principles than a monster movie or a serial killer movie, or whore movie. Young people today are not attracted to dry matter-of-fact movies, they want movies that entertain like the "Chronicles of Narnia" that have a Christian Theme to it. I for one don't mind fiction movies or books if what it brings across is morality, righteousness, a sense of right and wrong, and what is right and wrong, and responsibilities to your Creator.
Interesting article. Thanks for posting it!
Also, I have to correct my original post....it's Cloud Ten Pictures, not Productions. :)
That was my reaction as well.
That's like calling "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" a Jewish movie...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.