Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sacramental Grace is the Difference
CatholicExchange.com ^ | 07-11-06 | Theresa A. Thomas

Posted on 07/11/2006 5:22:16 PM PDT by Salvation

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: newberger
You didn't ask me, but when has THAT been known to keep me quiet.

I would venture to say, without any color of authority, that a marriage entered into with the intention that it be lifelong and all the rest of it, (love, cherish, inconditional, forsaking all others -- which isn't as much about old girl-friends as it is about this relationship taking priority over all other) AND understood as being a covenant within the covenantal framework of the work of Christ and so forth would be a valid or real marriage and would be part of the stream of Grace - both receiving and conveying grace.

However, there's a sort of plene esse (fullness of being?) which is promised (or the avaialability/accessability is promised) to couples in the Church which is not necessarily guaranteed to those outside the Church. (And I mean no offense but I think the Catholic Church also has a unique plene esse of "Churchness")

God showers grace where He will, He doesn't consult me, and He's "not a tame Lion", so I am uncertain about saying where He does NOT shed grace. But He is faithful and true and has promised certain graces in certain contexts under certain conditions.

I trust I make myself obscure.

21 posted on 07/12/2006 5:47:28 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Reality is not optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

BTTT


22 posted on 07/12/2006 7:32:51 AM PDT by Pyro7480 ("Love is the fusion of two souls in one in order to bring about mutual perfection." -S. Terese Andes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Yes, he married us. Baptized our first two children, then unfortunately passed away in 1994 of cancer at age 54. God rest his soul. Wonderful priest and uncle.


23 posted on 07/12/2006 7:46:02 AM PDT by Gerish (Feed your faith and your doubts will starve to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
Reading for comprehension is a good thing.

Try it.

24 posted on 07/12/2006 8:24:21 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: newberger

Dear newberger,

The Catholic Church assumes that marriage between two non-Catholic baptized persons is sacramental, unless shown otherwise.

For non-Catholic Christians who are received into the Catholic Church after having been divorced from another non-Catholic Christian, the Church requires a declaration of nullity of the previous marriage(s) before permitting the convert to marry in the Church. This is precisely because the Church recognizes the validity of non-Catholic Christian marriage.


sitetest


25 posted on 07/12/2006 8:31:07 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
I believe that sounds like a strawman argument written to get a bunch of posters upset with you.

And I believe the question hasn't been answered.

26 posted on 07/12/2006 8:43:40 AM PDT by Dont Mention the War (This tagline is false.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
And I believe the question hasn't been answered.

I would have to ask how you came up with that question in the first place based on what was said. You are making illogical jumps, which appears to be just an intro to Catholic bashing.

27 posted on 07/12/2006 9:26:54 AM PDT by technochick99 ( Firearm of choice: Sig Sauer....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: technochick99

Discuss the issues, but do NOT make it personal. Attributing motives to another poster is making it personal.


28 posted on 07/12/2006 9:31:07 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
I would have to ask how you came up with that question in the first place based on what was said. I can't follow the reasoning using basic logic and reading comp.

That said, no, fat people and depressed people are not evil. Please let me know how you got to that conclusion, and I would love to point out any areas in which I perceive errors.

29 posted on 07/12/2006 9:57:59 AM PDT by technochick99 ( Firearm of choice: Sig Sauer....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
So fat guys and people with depression are evil?

I've been fat and I am depressed, and as a matter of fact, I am if not evil certainly fallen and beset with sins. But, as was said in another connection, Thanks be to God who gives us the victory in our Lord IHS XP. According to authorities I trust, God loves me and would love me if fat old grumpy me were the only person in the world. And God's love does wonderful things.

For example. I can now benchpress my weight in pizza.

Okay, maybe that's not such a good example.

30 posted on 07/14/2006 8:13:38 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (If the gates of Hell prevail against it, it probably never was a church anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson